Updated
PERM law firm, #70 of 5,571 by cases
Sidley Austin LLP
- Biggest client
- Capgemini America, Inc. · 39% of its cases
- Main job
- Software Developers · 26% of its cases
- Filed from
- Illinois · The address on its filings
Is Sidley Austin LLP handling your case?
- When it'll likely be decided
- An email when DOL moves it
Cases
591
#70 of 5,571
Certified
557
2 denied
Approval
99.6%
field 96.8%
Median wage
$134,118
offered, per year
Median days
398
71 faster than the field
The practice
Who they file for, what the jobs are and where the work sits, from the employer, occupation and worksite on their own applications.
Who they file for
- Capgemini America, Inc. 230 filings · 100.0% approved
- The Options Clearing Corporation 59 filings · 100.0% approved
- Quantiphi, Inc. 40 filings · 100.0% approved
- Continental Casualty Company 31 filings · 100.0% approved
- FinThrive, Inc 28 filings
- Brunswick Corporation 27 filings
How this is counted
The employers named on the most applications from this firm. 415 of 591 filings, 70% of the total.
What the jobs are
SOC 15-1252.00 · 151 filings, 26% of everything they file · 100.0% approved
- Software Developers, Applications 15-1132119
- Computer and Information Systems Managers 11-302157
- Project Management Specialists 13-1082.0030
- Data Warehousing Specialists 15-1243.0129
- Data Scientists 15-2051.0019
How this is counted
These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 405 of 591 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.
Where the jobs are
- Illinois 334
- Texas 98
- Massachusetts 41
- California 33
- New York 25
- Tennessee 18
How this is counted
The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 6 states cover 549 of 591 filings.
Newspapers it advertised in
- 75 cases
Chicago Sun-Times
- 59 cases
The Dallas Morning News
- 22 cases
The New York Times
- 16 cases
Houston Chronicle
- 16 cases
Knoxville News Sentinel
- 7 cases
Chicago Tribune
How this is counted
The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.
Additional steps it used
- 242 cases
Job search websites
- 163 cases
The employer's website
- 134 cases
Local or ethnic newspapers
- 133 cases
Employee referral programs
- 52 cases
Radio or TV ads
- 4 cases
Campus placement offices
How this is counted
The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.
How long before filing it began
- 0.0%
Under 30 days
- 0.0%
30 to 59 days
- 14%
60 to 89 days
- 35%
90 to 119 days
- 31%
120 to 149 days
- 20%
150 to 180 days
- 0.0%
Over 180 days
How this is counted
Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.
Every program
Beyond PERM: its other work for clients
DOL names the law firm or agent on each H-1B labor condition application, prevailing wage request and H-2A, H-2B and CW-1 application it publishes. These are the ones that name Sidley Austin LLP.
H-1B LCAs
3,439 LCAs filed for clients, 96% certified
Decided from October 2019 to June 2026.
The employers it filed the most for
Prevailing wage requests
339 wage requests
Decided from October 2023 to May 2026.
The employers it filed the most for
Against other firms
Where it sits among 5,571 firms. The full ranking sorts every column.
Approval rate
99.6%ahead of 69%
Median days to decision
398 daysahead of 97%
Each bar counts firms at that value. More
Against the firms ranked nearest
The 120 firms ranked nearest filed between 318 and 3,815 cases.
- Their median wait
- 464 days
- This one
- 398 days
This one sits 66 days ahead of them.
Why no approval rate
A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.
Where this sits in the ranking
Ranked 70 of 5,571 by volume: 69 filed at least as many cases, and 5,501 filed no more.
- Just above
- Goeschl Law Corporation 598 cases
- Just below
- William Velie, Attorney at Law PLLC 589 cases
Other Illinois firms at this volume
Practices filing from Illinois at a similar rate, taken from the ranks nearest this one. More
Practices filing from Illinois at a similar rate, taken from the ranks nearest this one. State is the address on the filing, so a national firm appears under whichever office signed the form.
- #68 · IL Kempster, Corcoran, Quiceno & Lenz-Calvo, Ltd. 607 cases · 4 denied
- #74 · IL Kurczaba & Brozek Law Offices, LLC 577 cases · 19 denied
- #61 · IL Masuda Funai Eifert & Mitchell, Ltd. 642 cases · 4 denied
- #60 · IL Zulkie Partners LLC 646 cases · 18 denied
- #86 · IL LAW OFFICES OF GERARDO L. DEAN, LLC 512 cases · 12 denied
- #51 · IL International Legal and Business Services Group, LLP 815 cases · 11 denied
For the firm
Work at Sidley Austin LLP? Claim this page
Add the firm's website, a short description, languages, offices and what it handles. Once we've read it, it shows on this page apart from DOL's figures, marked as the firm's own words. A verified firm also gets a badge for its own site that links here.
Already claimed it?
Running the practice?
The free tracker carries the deadlines on every case, from the wage request to the I-140.
Notes on these numbers
What this rank counts, and what it doesn't
DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one firm can appear under several. The entry below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same firm; some are a different one. Rank #70 counts this page's cases only.
1 filing sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.
What these numbers don't say
5 notes
- The wage is the job, not the payer
- Their filings are led by Software Developers, 151 of 591. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles their clients file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
- Nothing here is waiting
- All 591 of the cases on this page carry a decision date, because every row in DOL's disclosure files does, so a case still in the queue is in none of these counts. The live tracker that does see pending cases records the employer on each one and not the firm, so a firm's current queue cannot be broken out at all. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
- The approval rate barely separates firms
- This firm is at 99.6%. Across every firm with enough decided cases to carry a rate the median is above 99%, and hundreds have no denials at all. Placing near the top of that axis mostly means being level with the rest of it.
- None of this measures the advice
- It measures filings that DOL approved or denied. Whether the case was worth filing, what it cost, and how the firm handled an audit aren’t in these files.
- A median over 559 decided cases
- DOL works one national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so this says when the firm's cases were filed at least as much as anything about the firm. Where the queue stands today is on the processing times page.
The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built
Filings newer than DOL's last published file can't be attributed to this firm until DOL publishes them. The live list on the case search page carries them by employer.
Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load
LCA disclosures: DOL quarterly LCA disclosure files (www.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Wage determinations: DOL quarterly PW disclosure files (www.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
What each source includes
Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.
Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.
LCA disclosures: Certified and denied H-1B labor condition applications only, with the wage offered.
Wage determinations: Decided prevailing wage requests only, with the wage DOL determined. Pending requests are absent.