PERM Tracker
Live DOL data · Automatic deadlines
Skip to main content

Updated

PERM sponsor, #1,307 of 70,985 by filings

Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Smith & Nephew, Inc. sponsors green cards: it filed 11 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on October 2, 2026. Smith & Nephew, Inc. has 6 PERM cases waiting with DOL.

Main job
Software Developers · 16% of its filings
Main worksite
Pittsburgh, PA · 34% of its filings
Industry
Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing · NAICS 33911

Waiting on a case with Smith & Nephew, Inc.?

  • When it'll likely be decided
  • An email when DOL moves it

It's on your ETA-9089 receipt. It goes into the page's address, so you can bookmark the result.

Don't have the number? Find it among their filings.

Or follow this employer by email

This rate is level with the field

Over 30 decided filings, this rate can't be told apart from the field in either direction.

Why

The 95% interval runs up to a 11.4% denial rate, which still covers the 3.20% the field as a whole records.

Filings

32

#1,307 of 70,985

Certified

30

0 denied

Approval

100.0%

field 96.8%

Median wage

$126,610

offered, per year

Median days

472

6 slower than the field

Right now

DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.

In the queue right now 34 cases in the live tracker

Waiting on a decision

6

of 34 tracked cases. The other 28 have been decided.

The oldest one still waiting was filed March 11, 2025, 19 months ago.

Where those 6 are standing

ANALYST REVIEW
583%

A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.

RECONSIDERATION APPEALS
117%

The employer has asked the same officer who denied the case to look at it again, within 30 days of the denial. The request can only use documents DOL already had, so new evidence can't be added to fix what the denial was based on.

None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.

From DOL's live status of 34 of this sponsor's cases: read this share against 34, never against the lifetime filings above. Live case tracker, as of October 21, 2026

Follow Smith & Nephew, Inc.

An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.

What DOL has done to its cases as a group

Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.

You confirm by email first. One click turns it off.

Its newest filings

Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.

The 8 newest. Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

How long it takes

How long their cases are taking

  1. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

    median of 6 decisions in the last 90 days

    301 days

  2. Every employer

    median of 30,289 decisions in the same 90 days

    302 days

About the same as everyone: DOL works one national line in filing order. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.

Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 80,222 cases, and would be decided around March 18, 2027 (between February 26, 2027 and April 27, 2027). Estimate another date

Every program

Across DOL's programs

The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.

PERM (green card)
32 published
6 pending
$126,610 median, n=32
Prevailing wage requests
38 published
2 pending
$113,776 median, n=34
H-1B labor condition applications
371 published
1 pending
$108,098 median, n=371

Its median H-1B wage is $108,098 across 371 LCAs, 14.6% lower than its median PERM wage of $126,610 across 32 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.

Of its 6 pending PERM cases, 1 (17%) sit outside DOL's normal queue: 1 under appeal. Where that sits among every employer.

Every case across these programs is in the search.

How these are counted

Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name, read under the 2 spellings DOL's files use for it; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.

Its newest wage requests and LCAs

Filed by Smith & Nephew, Inc., newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.

Wage requests

All wage requests by this employer

H-1B LCAs

  • I-200-26294-313324 Quality Assurance Manager 1 - KBGFJG109389-8 2026-10-21 · IN PROCESS
  • I-200-26287-298896 Senior Packaging Engineer - KBGFJG200307-8 2026-10-14 · CERTIFIED
  • I-200-26273-269098 MDR Regulatory Affairs Lead, Sports Medicine, Endoscopy 2026-09-30 · CERTIFIED
  • I-200-26261-245296 Senior Robotics Software Engineer - KBGFJG210934-10 2026-09-18 · CERTIFIED
  • I-200-26261-243769 Senior Financial Analyst - KBGFJG266057-4 2026-09-18 · CERTIFIED

All H-1B LCAs by this employer

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

What its H-1B LCAs were for

From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 371 LCAs filed by Smith & Nephew, Inc., 349 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.

New hires and transfers

98 positions for new employment, 71 moving here from another employer.

  • New employment 7a 98 · 28%
  • Change of employer 7e 71 · 20%
  • Continuing 7b 115 · 33%
  • Change in previous employment 7c 27 · 8%
  • Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
  • Amended petition 7f 39 · 11%

Shares of the 349 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.

What each box on the form means
  • New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
  • Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
  • Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
  • Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
  • Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
  • Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.

Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.

Wage level it chose

  • Level I 49 · 14%
  • Level II 107 · 31%
  • Level III 60 · 17%
  • Level IV 127 · 37%

Shares of the 343 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 6 of 349 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.

What it declared on Section H

H-1B-dependent
No
Found a willful violator
No

As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 19, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 335 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 361. Both are the employer's own answers.

What the two answers mean

H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.

Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.

Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR

Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 361 · E-3 (Australia) 10. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.

Against other sponsors

Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.

Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.

  • PERM approval rate

    100.0% of 30 decided PERM cases

    Higher than 67% of the 1,343 sponsors with 30 or more decided cases.

  • PERM filings in the last 12 months

    11 filed in the last 12 months

    Higher than 91% of the 13,997 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.

  • H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months

    69 certified in the last 24 months

    Higher than 95% of the 27,902 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.

  • Share of H-1B positions that were transfers

    11% of 80 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 41% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.

  • Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV

    57% of 77 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 73% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.

  • USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years

    97.9% of 96 USCIS decisions

    Higher than 41% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.

Position in the field 1,343 sponsors with 30+ decided

Approval rate

100.0%ahead of 34%, level with 891 more

0% 100%

Median days to decision

472 daysahead of 40%

5d 1152d
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. Sponsors with fewer than 30 decided cases are left out of the population rather than plotted, because a rate over a handful of cases lands wherever the handful landed. The line marks this one.
DOL PERM disclosure files

Against the sponsors ranked nearest

The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 30 and 33 filings.

Their median wait
464 days
This one
472 days

This one sits 8 days behind them.

Why no approval rate

A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.

Where this sits in the ranking

Ranked 1,307 of 70,985 by volume: 1,306 filed at least as many filings, and 69,678 filed no more.

Just above
Softrams, LLC 32 filings
Just below
Pilot Travel Centers LLC 32 filings

Sponsors filing at the same rate

Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.

Sponsors hiring for the same work

The employers filing the most PERM cases for Software Developers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.

What they file, and where

A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.

What the jobs are

Software Developers

SOC 15-1252.00 · 5 filings, 16% of everything they file

How this is counted

These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 18 of 32 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.

The industry they declared

Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing

NAICS 33911, 3391 · 31 filings

  • Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing 3391121
How this is counted

The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.

Where the jobs are

  • Pennsylvania 11
  • Tennessee 8
  • Massachusetts 6
  • Texas 6
  • Maryland 1
How this is counted

The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 5 states cover 32 of 32 filings.

Where the work is

  • Pittsburgh, PA 11
  • Andover, MA 6
  • Memphis, TN 6
  • Austin, TX 5
  • Cordova, TN 2
  • Columbia, MD 1
How this is counted

The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 6 cities cover 31 of 32 filings.

Who files for them

  1. EY Law LLP 32 filings · 100.0% approved
How this is counted

The law firm named on the application. 32 of 32 filings, 100% of the total.

Newspapers it advertised in

  1. The Commercial Appeal

    7 cases

  2. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

    6 cases

  3. Austin American-Statesman

    2 cases

  4. Boston Sunday Globe

    2 cases

  5. Austin American-Statesmen

    1 cases

  6. The Baltimore Sun

    1 cases
How this is counted

The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.

Additional steps it used

  1. The employer's website

    20 cases

  2. Job search websites

    20 cases

  3. Local or ethnic newspapers

    20 cases
How this is counted

The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.

How long before filing it began

  1. Under 30 days

    0.0%

  2. 30 to 59 days

    0.0%

  3. 60 to 89 days

    0.0%

  4. 90 to 119 days

    0.0%

  5. 120 to 149 days

    15%

  6. 150 to 180 days

    85%

  7. Over 180 days

    0.0%
How this is counted

Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.

Where every PERM employer recruits

History

Year by year since 2009

138 PERM decisions from FY2009 to FY2026, busiest in FY2024 with 14.

  • certified
  • denied
  • withdrawn

Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.

Every year as a table
Fiscal year Certified Denied Withdrawn
FY2009 1 0 0
FY2010 4 0 0
FY2011 2 0 0
FY2012 4 0 0
FY2013 2 0 0
FY2014 3 1 0
FY2015 6 1 1
FY2016 12 1 0
FY2017 10 0 1
FY2018 9 0 0
FY2019 10 1 0
FY2020 5 0 0
FY2021 12 1 0
FY2022 10 0 0
FY2023 9 0 0
FY2024 13 0 1
FY2025 13 0 1
FY2026 4 0 0

Decided in FY2016 to FY2023

The 25 most recent of 81. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.

Case Decided Outcome Job Offered wage
A-22220-01784 2023-09-14 certified Upstream Quality Engineer II, TN $80,106
A-22154-65907 2023-07-06 certified Regulatory Affairs Franchise Lead, MA $168,210
A-22192-85938 2023-06-09 certified Manufacturing Engineer 4, TN $112,547
A-22136-55895 2023-05-24 certified Quality System Data Analyst, TN $80,944
A-22112-44690 2023-03-15 certified Principal Solution Engineer, TX $135,200
A-22034-06794 2023-01-19 certified Software Engineer 3, MA $103,400
A-22011-96174 2022-11-28 certified Senior Quality Engineer, MA $105,581
A-21351-87888 2022-11-28 certified Senior OpEx Business Analytics Architect, TN $125,000
The other 17
A-21313-69992 2022-10-17 certified Staff Robotics Software Project Manager, PA $137,500
A-21329-78044 2022-09-08 certified Executive Endoscopy Sales Representative, TN $103,334
A-21316-72251 2022-06-06 certified Quality Assurance Engineer II, OK $65,000
A-21258-44371 2022-05-17 certified Senior Regulatory Specialist, TN $90,000
A-21258-44427 2022-04-28 certified Technical Architect, MA $135,658
A-21207-22306 2022-04-18 certified Senior Security DevOps Engineer, TN $123,240
A-21258-44435 2022-04-13 certified Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist, TX $94,484
A-21208-23273 2022-02-28 certified Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist, MA $105,000
A-21177-08201 2022-02-22 certified Senior Finance Director (Sports Medicine), MA $170,367
A-21131-84920 2021-11-10 certified Senior Robotics Electrical Engineer, PA $99,972
A-21116-78646 2021-10-21 certified Development Engineer 2, TX $106,350
A-20230-89241 2021-08-26 certified Evidence Evaluation Specialist, MA $89,621
A-21054-54957 2021-08-13 certified R&D Engineer II, TX $80,330
A-21060-57052 2021-08-12 certified Design Quality Engineer II, MA $85,717
A-21026-45922 2021-07-16 certified Staff Software Requirements & Test Engineer, PA $125,000
A-21011-41041 2021-07-16 certified Manufacturing Engineer II, TN $72,000
A-21005-39141 2021-07-15 certified Senior Research Scientist, MA $117,790

Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023

From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.

Country of citizenship

  • India 51
  • China 6
  • United Kingdom 5
  • Mexico 4
  • Canada 3
  • Nepal 2

Worker's education

  • Master's 54
  • Bachelor's 22
  • None 3
  • Doctorate 2

Visa held when filed

  • H-1B 66
  • L-1 12
  • TN 3

Schools

  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY 6
  • ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 3
  • STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO 3
  • BANGALORE UNIVERSITY 2
  • CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY 2
  • JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2

Fields of study

  • MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 12
  • BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 10
  • INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING 7
  • ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 6
  • COMPUTER ENGINEERING 4
  • MATHEMATICS 3

Notes on these numbers

What this rank counts, and what it doesn't

DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The 19 entries below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #1,307 counts this page's cases only.

43 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.

What these numbers don't say

5 notes
The wage is the job, not the payer
Their filings are led by Software Developers, 5 of 32. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
Volume doesn’t change the wait
DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 32 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
The name is a legal entity
DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 1,307. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
A median over 30 decided cases
The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
Two sources, and they do not add up
The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is PA. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.

The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built

Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load

Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 21, 2026 · daily

What each source includes

Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.

Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.

Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.

Cite this page