PERM Tracker
Live DOL data · Automatic deadlines
Skip to main content

Updated

PERM sponsor, #2,658 of 70,985 by filings

Sidley Austin (US) LLP

Sidley Austin (US) LLP sponsors green cards: it filed 8 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on September 3, 2026. Sidley Austin (US) LLP has 5 PERM cases waiting with DOL.

Main job
Lawyers · 82% of its filings
Main worksite
New York, NY · 47% of its filings
Industry
Offices of Lawyers · NAICS 54111

Waiting on a case with Sidley Austin (US) LLP?

  • When it'll likely be decided
  • An email when DOL moves it

It's on your ETA-9089 receipt. It goes into the page's address, so you can bookmark the result.

Don't have the number? Find it among their filings.

Or follow this employer by email

Too few cases for a rate

13 decided filings: too few for an approval rate.

Why

Across every PERM case DOL decided in this window, 3.20% were denied. At that rate a file this size comes back clean most of the time whatever the sponsor did, so a percentage would be a fact about how few cases there are. Telling a clean record apart from the field takes about 117 decided cases.

Filings

17

#2,658 of 70,985

Certified

13

0 denied

Approval

Not shown

withheld: 13 decided

Median wage

$295,000

offered, per year

Median days

490

24 slower than the field

Right now

DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.

In the queue right now 25 cases in the live tracker

Waiting on a decision

5

of 25 tracked cases. The other 20 have been decided.

The oldest one still waiting was filed January 20, 2026, 9 months ago.

Where those 5 are standing

ANALYST REVIEW
5100%

A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.

None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.

From DOL's live status of 25 of this sponsor's cases: read this share against 25, never against the lifetime filings above. Live case tracker, as of October 23, 2026

Follow Sidley Austin (US) LLP

An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.

What DOL has done to its cases as a group

Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.

You confirm by email first. One click turns it off.

Its newest filings

Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.

  • G-100-26246-215138 Managing Associate (M&A and Private Equity) filed 2026-09-03 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26125-872548 Managing Associate (Investment Funds) filed 2026-05-05 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26058-671112 Managing Associate (Commercial Litigation & Disputes) filed 2026-02-27 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26029-602552 Managing Associate (Capital Markets) filed 2026-01-29 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26020-571533 Counsel (M&A and Private Equity) filed 2026-01-20 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-25350-488215 Managing Associate (IP Litigation) filed 2025-12-16 · CERTIFIED
  • G-100-25337-454246 Senior Managing Associate (M&A and Private Equity) filed 2025-12-03 · CERTIFIED
  • G-100-25336-452000 Managing Associate (Insurance) filed 2025-12-02 · CERTIFIED

Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

How long it takes

How long their cases are taking

  1. Every employer

    median of 31,712 decisions in the same 90 days

    301 days

Only 3 of their cases were decided in the last 90 days, too few for a median of their own. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.

Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 79,711 cases, and would be decided around March 20, 2027 (between February 28, 2027 and April 29, 2027). Estimate another date

Every program

Across DOL's programs

The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.

PERM (green card)
17 published
5 pending
$295,000 median, n=17
Prevailing wage requests
17 published
2 pending
$143,998 median, n=17
H-1B labor condition applications
193 published
2 pending
$235,000 median, n=193

Its median H-1B wage is $235,000 across 193 LCAs, 20.3% lower than its median PERM wage of $295,000 across 17 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.

Every case across these programs is in the search.

How these are counted

Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.

Its newest wage requests and LCAs

Filed by Sidley Austin (US) LLP, newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.

Wage requests

  • P-100-26260-243302 Managing Associate Attorney (Investment Funds) 2026-09-17 · IN PROCESS
  • P-100-26215-142509 Managing Associate Attorney (Tax) 2026-08-03 · IN PROCESS
  • P-100-26187-079798 Managing Associate (Investment Funds) 2026-07-06 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
  • P-100-26008-544700 Managing Associate (M&A and Private Equity) $98,114 per year 2026-01-08 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
  • P-100-25171-117313 Managing Associate (Investment Funds) $156,832 per year 2025-06-20 · DETERMINATION ISSUED

All wage requests by this employer

H-1B LCAs

All H-1B LCAs by this employer

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

What its H-1B LCAs were for

From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 193 LCAs filed by Sidley Austin (US) LLP, 186 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.

New hires and transfers

127 positions for new employment, 11 moving here from another employer.

  • New employment 7a 127 · 62%
  • Change of employer 7e 11 · 5%
  • Continuing 7b 39 · 19%
  • Change in previous employment 7c 2 · 1%
  • Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
  • Amended petition 7f 26 · 13%

Shares of the 205 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.

What each box on the form means
  • New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
  • Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
  • Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
  • Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
  • Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
  • Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.

Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.

Wage level it chose

  • Level I 51 · 28%
  • Level II 46 · 25%
  • Level III 57 · 31%
  • Level IV 29 · 16%

Shares of the 183 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 3 of 186 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.

What it declared on Section H

H-1B-dependent
No
Found a willful violator
No

As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 3, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 156 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 168. Both are the employer's own answers.

What the two answers mean

H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.

Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.

Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR

Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 168 · E-3 (Australia) 22 · H-1B1 (Singapore) 3. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.

Against other sponsors

Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.

Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.

  • PERM filings in the last 12 months

    8 filed in the last 12 months

    Higher than 88% of the 14,032 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.

  • H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months

    86 certified in the last 24 months

    Higher than 96% of the 27,861 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.

  • Share of H-1B positions that were transfers

    3.0% of 99 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 12% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.

  • Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV

    43% of 98 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 59% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.

  • USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years

    99.1% of 106 USCIS decisions

    Higher than 56% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.

Position in the field 1,343 sponsors with 30+ decided

Approval rate

not shownunder 30 decided

0% 100%

Median days to decision

490 daysmiddle of 13 decided, too few to rank

5d 1152d
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. Sponsors with fewer than 30 decided cases are left out of the population rather than plotted, because a rate over a handful of cases lands wherever the handful landed. This sponsor has 13 decided cases, so its median days is marked but left unranked, and no approval rate is drawn at all.
DOL PERM disclosure files

Against the sponsors ranked nearest

The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 17 and 18 filings.

Their median wait
472 days
This one
490 days

This one sits 18 days behind them.

Why no approval rate

A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.

Where this sits in the ranking

Ranked 2,658 of 70,985 by volume: 2,657 filed at least as many filings, and 68,327 filed no more.

Just above
The Carlyle Group Employee Co. LLC 17 filings
Just below
Vertex U.S. Holdings, Inc. 17 filings

Sponsors filing at the same rate

Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.

Sponsors hiring for the same work

The employers filing the most PERM cases for Lawyers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.

What they file, and where

A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.

What the jobs are

Lawyers

SOC 23-1011.00 · 14 filings, 82% of everything they file

How this is counted

These are the 2 occupations with the most filings, 15 of 17 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.

The industry they declared

Offices of Lawyers

NAICS 54111, 541110 · 17 filings

How this is counted

The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.

Where the jobs are

  • New York 8
  • Illinois 4
  • California 2
  • Texas 2
  • Florida 1
How this is counted

The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 5 states cover 17 of 17 filings.

Where the work is

  • New York, NY 8
  • Chicago, IL 4
  • Dallas, TX 1
  • Houston, TX 1
  • Los Angeles, CA 1
  • Miami, FL 1
How this is counted

The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 6 cities cover 16 of 17 filings.

Who files for them

  1. Sidley Austin LLP 17 filings
How this is counted

The law firm named on the application. 17 of 17 filings, 100% of the total.

Newspapers it advertised in

  1. The New York Times

    8 cases

  2. Chicago Sun-Times

    4 cases

  3. The Dallas Morning News

    1 cases

  4. Houston Chronicle

    1 cases

  5. Los Angeles Times

    1 cases

  6. Miami Herald

    1 cases
How this is counted

The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.

Additional steps it used

  1. The employer's website

    17 cases

  2. Job search websites

    17 cases

  3. Local or ethnic newspapers

    17 cases
How this is counted

The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.

How long before filing it began

  1. Under 30 days

    0.0%

  2. 30 to 59 days

    0.0%

  3. 60 to 89 days

    35%

  4. 90 to 119 days

    24%

  5. 120 to 149 days

    41%

  6. 150 to 180 days

    0.0%

  7. Over 180 days

    0.0%
How this is counted

Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.

Where every PERM employer recruits

History

Year by year since 2014

37 PERM decisions from FY2014 to FY2026, busiest in FY2025 with 12.

  • certified
  • denied
  • withdrawn

Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.

Every year as a table
Fiscal year Certified Denied Withdrawn
FY2014 3 0 0
FY2015 1 0 0
FY2016 3 0 0
FY2017 1 0 0
FY2018 2 0 0
FY2019 4 1 0
FY2020 3 0 0
FY2021 2 0 0
FY2022 0 0 0
FY2023 0 0 0
FY2024 1 0 1
FY2025 10 0 2
FY2026 2 0 1

Decided in FY2016 to FY2023

All 16. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.

Case Decided Outcome Job Offered wage
A-20098-40309 2021-01-04 certified Associate Attorney (Food, Drug, & Medical Device Regulatory), DC $255,000
A-20112-45501 2020-10-02 certified Associate Attorney (IP Litigation), CA $305,000
A-19352-97550 2020-05-29 certified Associate (Capital Markets), NY $190,000
A-19252-55347 2020-01-30 certified Associate (Capital Markets), NY $300,000
A-19182-25666 2019-10-03 certified Mid-level Associate, CA $280,000
A-19190-28152 2019-09-24 certified Corporate Transaction and Litigation Attorney, NY $180,000
A-19116-98137 2019-06-21 certified Mid-Level Global Finance Associate, NY $260,000
A-19115-97466 2019-06-21 denied Associate (Capital Markets), NY $300,000
The other 8
A-18324-43382 2019-03-06 certified Mid-Level IP Litigation Associate, CA $235,000
A-18304-35820 2019-03-01 certified Associate Attorney, NY $235,000
A-18039-41488 2018-06-22 certified Mid-Level Associate (International Trade & Dispute Resolution), DC $170,000
A-17157-46954 2017-10-27 certified IP Litigation Associate, CA $260,000
A-16215-38380 2016-11-04 certified Mid-Level Associate/Securities & Derivatives Enforcement and Regulatory, NY $250,000
A-16008-59129 2016-06-06 certified Mid-Level Associate/Insurance and Financial Services, IL $230,000
A-15336-45827 2016-05-24 certified Partner, NY $380,000
A-15100-65995 2015-10-28 certified Mid-Level Associate/Intellectual Property Litigation, DC $230,000

Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023

From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.

Country of citizenship

  • Canada 3
  • South Korea 3
  • Australia 1
  • China 1
  • Colombia 1
  • Germany 1

Worker's education

  • Other 16

Visa held when filed

  • H-1B 13
  • TN 3

Schools

  • NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW 3
  • COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW 2
  • YORK UNIVERSITY, OSGOODE HALL LAW SCHOOL 2
  • CORNELL LAW SCHOOL 1
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER 1
  • HARVARD LAW SCHOOL 1

Fields of study

  • LAW 14
  • INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC LAW 1
  • INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 1

Notes on these numbers

What this rank counts, and what it doesn't

DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The entry below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #2,658 counts this page's cases only.

2 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.

What these numbers don't say

5 notes
The wage is the job, not the payer
Their filings are led by Lawyers, 14 of 17. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
Volume doesn’t change the wait
DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 17 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
The name is a legal entity
DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 2,658. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
A median over 13 decided cases
The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
Two sources, and they do not add up
The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is NY. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.

The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built

Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load

Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 23, 2026 · daily

What each source includes

Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.

Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.

Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.

Cite this page