Updated
PERM sponsor, #1,088 of 70,985 by filings
GSPANN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
GSPANN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. sponsors green cards: it filed 8 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on May 27, 2026. GSPANN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. has 7 PERM cases waiting with DOL.
- Main job
- Data Warehousing Specialists · 47% of its filings
- Main worksite
- Milpitas, CA · 100% of its filings
- Industry
- Other Computer Related Services · NAICS 541519
Waiting on a case with GSPANN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.?
- When it'll likely be decided
- An email when DOL moves it
This rate is level with the field
Over 36 decided filings, this rate can't be told apart from the field in either direction.
Why
The 95% interval runs up to a 9.6% denial rate, which still covers the 3.20% the field as a whole records.
Filings
38
#1,088 of 70,985
Certified
36
0 denied
Approval
100.0%
field 96.8%
Median wage
$192,941
offered, per year
Median days
466
at the field median
Right now
DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.
Waiting on a decision
7
of 41 tracked cases. The other 34 have been decided.
The oldest one still waiting was filed March 31, 2026, 6 months ago.
Where those 7 are standing
- ANALYST REVIEW
- 7100%
A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.
None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.
Follow GSPANN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.
What DOL has done to its cases as a group
Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.
Its newest filings
Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.
- G-100-26147-953374 Senior Technical Consultant filed 2026-05-27 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26146-947828 Senior Technical Consultant filed 2026-05-26 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26145-946397 Senior Technical Consultant filed 2026-05-25 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26145-946358 Senior Technical Consultant filed 2026-05-25 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26145-946347 Senior Technical Consultant filed 2026-05-25 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26091-746927 Senior Technical Consultant filed 2026-04-01 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26090-742757 Senior Technical Consultant filed 2026-03-31 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-25342-464865 Senior Technical Consultant filed 2025-12-08 · DENIED
The 8 newest. Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
How long it takes
How long their cases are taking
- 302 days
Every employer
median of 28,615 decisions in the same 90 days
Only 1 of their cases was decided in the last 90 days, too few for a median of their own. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.
Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 80,983 cases, and would be decided around March 15, 2027 (between February 23, 2027 and April 24, 2027). Estimate another date
Every program
Across DOL's programs
The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.
- PERM (green card)
- 38 published
- 7 pending
- $192,941 median, n=38
- Prevailing wage requests
- 19 published
- 4 pending
- $226,325 median, n=19
- H-1B labor condition applications
- 596 published
- 1 pending
- $119,122 median, n=596
Its median H-1B wage is $119,122 across 596 LCAs, 38.3% lower than its median PERM wage of $192,941 across 38 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.
Every case across these programs is in the search.
How these are counted
Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.
Its newest wage requests and LCAs
Filed by GSPANN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.
Wage requests
- P-100-26267-258751 Associate Director 2026-09-24 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26247-218492 Sr. Technical Consultant 2026-09-04 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26244-209522 Sr. QA Engineer 2026-09-01 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26244-209513 Technical Consultant 2026-09-01 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26139-928947 Data Engineer 2026-05-19 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
H-1B LCAs
- I-200-26286-297902 Lead Data Engineer 2026-10-13 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26272-267463 Multi Solution Architect 2026-09-29 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-26271-264268 Sr. Technical Consultant 2026-09-28 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-26244-209462 Sr. Technical Consultant 2026-09-01 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-26222-158226 Data Scientist 2026-08-10 · CERTIFIED
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
What its H-1B LCAs were for
From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 596 LCAs filed by GSPANN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 593 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.
New hires and transfers
229 positions for new employment, 54 moving here from another employer.
- New employment 7a 229 · 38%
- Change of employer 7e 54 · 9%
- Continuing 7b 119 · 20%
- Change in previous employment 7c 123 · 21%
- Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
- Amended petition 7f 72 · 12%
Shares of the 596 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.
What each box on the form means
- New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
- Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
- Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
- Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
- Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
- Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.
Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.
Wage level it chose
- Level I 72 · 12%
- Level II 473 · 80%
- Level III 44 · 7%
- Level IV 4 · 1%
Shares of the 593 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 0 of 593 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.
What it declared on Section H
- H-1B-dependent
- Yes
- Found a willful violator
- No
As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 19, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 533 of 536 LCAs, and a willful violator on 1 of 596. Both are the employer's own answers.
What the two answers mean
H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.
Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.
Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR
Against other sponsors
Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.
How it compares with other sponsors
Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.
PERM approval rate
100.0% of 36 decided PERM cases
Higher than 67% of the 1,343 sponsors with 30 or more decided cases.
PERM filings in the last 12 months
8 filed in the last 12 months
Higher than 88% of the 13,942 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.
H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months
111 certified in the last 24 months
Higher than 97% of the 27,916 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.
Share of H-1B positions that were transfers
11% of 141 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 41% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.
Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV
13% of 141 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 31% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.
USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years
96.0% of 174 USCIS decisions
Higher than 20% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.
Also on its record
- Its newest LCA that answered declared it H-1B dependent (decided 2026-06-26).
- It declared itself a willful violator on 1 LCA.
Approval rate
100.0%ahead of 34%, level with 891 more
Median days to decision
466 daysahead of 48%
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Against the sponsors ranked nearest
The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 36 and 39 filings.
- Their median wait
- 466 days
- This one
- 466 days
Exactly where this one sits.
Why no approval rate
A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.
Where this sits in the ranking
Ranked 1,088 of 70,985 by volume: 1,087 filed at least as many filings, and 69,897 filed no more.
- Just above
- Michael Ray Enterprises, Inc. 38 filings
- Just below
- Virat Solutions Inc 38 filings
Sponsors filing at the same rate
Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.
- #1,087 Michael Ray Enterprises, Inc. 38 filings · none denied
- #1,089 Virat Solutions Inc 38 filings · none denied
- #1,086 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 38 filings · none denied
- #1,090 Code Gravity LLC 38 filings · none denied
- #1,085 THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 38 filings · none denied
- #1,091 Gainwell Technologies LLC 38 filings · 2 denied
Sponsors hiring for the same work
The employers filing the most PERM cases for Data Warehousing Specialists, the occupation this sponsor files for most.
- #133 Caremark LLC 272 filings · 1 denied
- #12 WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. 2,012 filings · 3 denied
- #18 Deloitte Consulting LLP 1,527 filings · 1 denied
- #145 Aetna Resources LLC 260 filings · 1 denied
- #22 Meta Platforms, Inc. 1,257 filings · 6 denied
- #219 United Services Automobile Association 180 filings · 14 denied
What they file, and where
A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.
What the jobs are
SOC 15-1243.01 · 18 filings, 47% of everything they file
- Software Developers, Applications 15-11328
- Computer Systems Analysts 15-1211.007
- Software Developers 15-1252.004
How this is counted
These are the 4 occupations with the most filings, 37 of 38 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.
The industry they declared
Other Computer Related Services
NAICS 541519 · 34 filings
- Computer Systems Design and Related Services 541514
How this is counted
The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.
Where the jobs are
- California 38
How this is counted
The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. This state covers 38 of 38 filings.
Where the work is
- Milpitas, CA 38
How this is counted
The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. This city covers 38 of 38 filings.
Who files for them
- Law Office of Samira Recob 38 filings · 100.0% approved
How this is counted
The law firm named on the application. 38 of 38 filings, 100% of the total.
Newspapers it advertised in
- 30 cases
San Francisco Chronicle
How this is counted
The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.
Additional steps it used
- 30 cases
Job search websites
- 30 cases
Local or ethnic newspapers
- 30 cases
Trade or professional organizations
How this is counted
The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.
How long before filing it began
- 0.0%
Under 30 days
- 0.0%
30 to 59 days
- 80%
60 to 89 days
- 10%
90 to 119 days
- 3.3%
120 to 149 days
- 6.7%
150 to 180 days
- 0.0%
Over 180 days
How this is counted
Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.
History
Year by year since 2008
173 PERM decisions from FY2008 to FY2026, busiest in FY2016 with 18.
- certified
- denied
- withdrawn
Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.
Every year as a table
| Fiscal year | Certified | Denied | Withdrawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2008 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2009 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2010 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2011 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2012 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| FY2013 | 8 | 1 | 1 |
| FY2014 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2015 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2016 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2017 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2018 | 17 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2019 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2020 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2021 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2023 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2024 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2025 | 14 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2026 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
Decided in FY2016 to FY2023
The 25 most recent of 100. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.
| Case | Decided | Outcome | Job | Offered wage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-22259-22885 | 2023-07-06 | certified | QA Engineer, CA | $168,834 |
| A-22153-64907 | 2023-04-03 | certified | Technical Consultant, CA | $184,080 |
| A-22157-66627 | 2023-03-21 | certified | Technical Consultant, CA | $184,080 |
| A-22161-70064 | 2023-03-09 | certified | Technical Consultant, CA | $184,080 |
| A-22136-55901 | 2023-02-21 | certified | Technical Consultant, CA | $184,080 |
| A-22073-24926 | 2023-01-17 | withdrawn | Technical Consultant, CA | $184,080 |
| A-22073-25082 | 2023-01-05 | certified | Technical Consultant, CA | $184,080 |
| A-22073-24964 | 2023-01-05 | certified | Technical Consultant, CA | $184,080 |
The other 17
| A-22076-27147 | 2022-12-15 | certified | Technical Consultant, CA | $184,080 |
| A-22067-20913 | 2022-12-15 | certified | Technical Consultant, CA | $184,080 |
| A-22074-25717 | 2022-12-14 | certified | Technical Consultant, CA | $184,080 |
| A-22068-21623 | 2022-12-14 | certified | Technical Consultant, CA | $184,080 |
| A-22070-24389 | 2022-12-13 | certified | Technical Consultant, CA | $184,080 |
| A-22045-11163 | 2022-11-09 | certified | Technical Consultant, CA | $110,094 |
| A-22024-01950 | 2022-10-07 | certified | Technical Consultant, CA | $110,094 |
| A-22014-98453 | 2022-10-07 | certified | Technical Consultant, CA | $110,094 |
| A-20012-05691 | 2020-11-24 | certified | Senior Technical Consultant, CA | $100,152 |
| A-20105-42971 | 2020-09-04 | certified | Senior QA Engineer, CA | $163,530 |
| A-20077-31971 | 2020-08-28 | certified | Senior Technical Consultant, CA | $140,650 |
| A-20086-35630 | 2020-08-27 | certified | Senior Technical Consultant, CA | $140,650 |
| A-20094-39170 | 2020-08-26 | certified | Senior Technical Consultant, CA | $140,650 |
| A-20086-35517 | 2020-08-26 | certified | Senior Technical Consultant, CA | $140,650 |
| A-20056-23364 | 2020-07-13 | certified | Senior Technical Consultant, CA | $140,650 |
| A-20056-22882 | 2020-06-19 | certified | Senior Technical Consultant, CA | $140,650 |
| A-20044-18844 | 2020-06-19 | certified | Senior Technical Consultant, CA | $140,650 |
Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023
From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.
Country of citizenship
- India 98
- China 1
- United States Of America 1
Worker's education
- Bachelor's 61
- Master's 39
Visa held when filed
- H-1B 100
Schools
- JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 6
- ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY 2
- ANNA UNIVERSITY 2
- BHARTIYA VIDYA MANDIR 2
- OSMANIA UNIVERSITY 2
- PERIYAR UNIVERSITY 2
Fields of study
- COMPUTER APPLICATIONS 18
- COMPUTER SCIENCE 16
- COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING 9
- ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING 7
- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 6
- COMPUTER SCIENCE ENGINEERING 4
Notes on these numbers
What these numbers don't say
5 notes
- The wage is the job, not the payer
- Their filings are led by Data Warehousing Specialists, 18 of 38. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
- Volume doesn’t change the wait
- DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 38 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
- The name is a legal entity
- DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 1,088. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
- A median over 36 decided cases
- The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
- Two sources, and they do not add up
- The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is CA. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built
Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load
Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 18, 2026 · daily
What each source includes
Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.
Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.
Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.