PERM Tracker
Live DOL data · Automatic deadlines
Skip to main content

Updated

PERM sponsor, #447 of 70,985 by filings

Schneider Electric USA, Inc.

Schneider Electric USA, Inc. sponsors green cards: it filed 30 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on October 19, 2026. Schneider Electric USA, Inc. has 18 PERM cases waiting with DOL.

Main job
Electrical Engineers · 16% of its filings
Main worksite
Franklin, TN · 25% of its filings
Industry
Power, Distribution, and Specialty Transformer Manufacturing · NAICS 335311

Waiting on a case with Schneider Electric USA, Inc.?

  • When it'll likely be decided
  • An email when DOL moves it

It's on your ETA-9089 receipt. It goes into the page's address, so you can bookmark the result.

Don't have the number? Find it among their filings.

Or follow this employer by email

This rate is level with the field

Over 80 decided filings, this rate can't be told apart from the field in either direction.

Why

The 95% interval runs up to a 6.7% denial rate, which still covers the 3.20% the field as a whole records.

Filings

81

#447 of 70,985

Certified

79

1 denied

Approval

98.8%

field 96.8%

Median wage

$115,482

offered, per year

Median days

502

36 slower than the field

Right now

DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.

In the queue right now 115 cases in the live tracker

Waiting on a decision

18

of 115 tracked cases. The other 97 have been decided.

The oldest one still waiting was filed January 9, 2026, 9 months ago.

Where those 18 are standing

ANALYST REVIEW
18100%

A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.

None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.

From DOL's live status of 115 of this sponsor's cases: read this share against 115, never against the lifetime filings above. Live case tracker, as of October 25, 2026

Follow Schneider Electric USA, Inc.

An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.

What DOL has done to its cases as a group

Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.

You confirm by email first. One click turns it off.

Its newest filings

Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.

  • G-100-26292-308959 Tender Architect Team Lead filed 2026-10-19 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26292-310254 Lead, Salesforce Business Analyst filed 2026-10-19 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26259-238562 Senior Electrical Engineer filed 2026-09-16 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26259-238720 Welding and Automation Project Manager filed 2026-09-16 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26249-219260 EcoStruxure Plant Regional Consultant filed 2026-09-06 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26238-195771 Supplier Quality Senior Engineer filed 2026-08-26 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26234-187113 Sr. Manager, Customer Satisfaction and Quality, Web Giants filed 2026-08-22 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26227-171525 Digital Power Services Offer Manager filed 2026-08-15 · ANALYST REVIEW

The 8 newest. Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

How long it takes

How long their cases are taking

  1. Schneider Electric USA, Inc.

    median of 13 decisions in the last 90 days

    303 days

  2. Every employer

    median of 32,343 decisions in the same 90 days

    301 days

About the same as everyone: DOL works one national line in filing order. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.

Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 80,225 cases, and would be decided around March 24, 2027 (between March 4, 2027 and May 3, 2027). Estimate another date

Every program

Across DOL's programs

The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.

PERM (green card)
81 published
18 pending
$115,482 median, n=81
Prevailing wage requests
187 published
8 pending
$121,472 median, n=164
H-1B labor condition applications
807 published
0 pending
$112,350 median, n=806

Its median H-1B wage is $112,350 across 806 LCAs, 2.7% lower than its median PERM wage of $115,482 across 81 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.

Every case across these programs is in the search.

How these are counted

Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.

Its newest wage requests and LCAs

Filed by Schneider Electric USA, Inc., newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.

Wage requests

All wage requests by this employer

H-1B LCAs

All H-1B LCAs by this employer

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

What its H-1B LCAs were for

From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 807 LCAs filed by Schneider Electric USA, Inc., 787 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.

New hires and transfers

302 positions for new employment, 111 moving here from another employer.

  • New employment 7a 302 · 38%
  • Change of employer 7e 111 · 14%
  • Continuing 7b 222 · 28%
  • Change in previous employment 7c 6 · 1%
  • Concurrent employment 7d 1 · 1%
  • Amended petition 7f 149 · 19%

Shares of the 787 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.

What each box on the form means
  • New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
  • Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
  • Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
  • Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
  • Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
  • Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.

Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.

Wage level it chose

  • Level I 57 · 7%
  • Level II 255 · 34%
  • Level III 235 · 31%
  • Level IV 214 · 28%

Shares of the 761 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 26 of 787 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.

What it declared on Section H

H-1B-dependent
No
Found a willful violator
No

As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 22, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 752 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 790. Both are the employer's own answers.

What the two answers mean

H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.

Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.

Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR

Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 789 · E-3 (Australia) 16 · H-1B1 (Chile) 2. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.

Against other sponsors

Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.

Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.

  • PERM approval rate

    98.8% of 80 decided PERM cases

    Higher than 24% of the 1,343 sponsors with 30 or more decided cases.

  • PERM filings in the last 12 months

    30 filed in the last 12 months

    Higher than 97% of the 14,050 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.

  • H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months

    253 certified in the last 24 months

    Higher than 99% of the 27,833 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.

  • Share of H-1B positions that were transfers

    13% of 281 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 46% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.

  • Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV

    60% of 270 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 75% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.

  • USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years

    98.6% of 283 USCIS decisions

    Higher than 50% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.

Position in the field 1,343 sponsors with 30+ decided

Approval rate

98.8%ahead of 24%

0% 100%

Median days to decision

502 daysahead of 4%

5d 1152d
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. Sponsors with fewer than 30 decided cases are left out of the population rather than plotted, because a rate over a handful of cases lands wherever the handful landed. The line marks this one.
DOL PERM disclosure files

Against the sponsors ranked nearest

The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 73 and 94 filings.

Their median wait
462 days
This one
502 days

This one sits 40 days behind them.

Why no approval rate

A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.

Where this sits in the ranking

Ranked 447 of 70,985 by volume: 446 filed at least as many filings, and 70,538 filed no more.

Just above
Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. 81 filings
Just below
EMC Corporation 81 filings

Sponsors filing at the same rate

Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.

Sponsors hiring for the same work

The employers filing the most PERM cases for Electrical Engineers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.

What they file, and where

A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.

What the jobs are

Electrical Engineers

SOC 17-2071.00 · 13 filings, 16% of everything they file

How this is counted

These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 40 of 81 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.

The industry they declared

Power, Distribution, and Specialty Transformer Manufacturing

NAICS 335311 · 81 filings

How this is counted

The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.

Where the jobs are

  • Massachusetts 26
  • Tennessee 24
  • Texas 11
  • North Carolina 4
  • Illinois 3
  • Missouri 3
How this is counted

The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 6 states cover 71 of 81 filings.

Where the work is

  • Franklin, TN 20
  • Andover, MA 14
  • Boston, MA 11
  • El Paso, TX 4
  • Houston, TX 4
  • Smyrna, TN 4
How this is counted

The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 6 cities cover 57 of 81 filings.

Who files for them

  1. MEHLMAN JACOBS LLP 70 filings · 98.6% approved
  2. Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen Loewy, LLP 11 filings
How this is counted

The law firm named on the application. 81 of 81 filings, 100% of the total.

Newspapers it advertised in

  1. The Boston Globe

    21 cases

  2. Nashville Tennessean

    19 cases

  3. El Paso Times

    4 cases

  4. Houston Chronicle

    4 cases

  5. Chicago Tribune

    3 cases

  6. Columbia Daily Tribune

    3 cases
How this is counted

The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.

Additional steps it used

  1. The employer's website

    70 cases

  2. Job search websites

    70 cases

  3. Local or ethnic newspapers

    70 cases
How this is counted

The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.

How long before filing it began

  1. Under 30 days

    0.0%

  2. 30 to 59 days

    0.0%

  3. 60 to 89 days

    20%

  4. 90 to 119 days

    24%

  5. 120 to 149 days

    11%

  6. 150 to 180 days

    43%

  7. Over 180 days

    1.4%
How this is counted

Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.

Where every PERM employer recruits

History

Year by year since 2011

332 PERM decisions from FY2011 to FY2026, busiest in FY2026 with 40.

  • certified
  • denied
  • withdrawn

Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.

Every year as a table
Fiscal year Certified Denied Withdrawn
FY2011 9 0 0
FY2012 6 0 0
FY2013 3 0 1
FY2014 21 0 1
FY2015 28 1 2
FY2016 20 0 0
FY2017 25 0 0
FY2018 36 0 0
FY2019 25 1 0
FY2020 19 0 0
FY2021 22 0 0
FY2022 12 0 0
FY2023 19 0 0
FY2024 11 0 0
FY2025 30 0 0
FY2026 38 1 1

Decided in FY2016 to FY2023

The 25 most recent of 179. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.

Case Decided Outcome Job Offered wage
A-22236-10822 2023-09-28 certified Senior Manager, Control Tower, TN $106,392
A-22159-67981 2023-09-01 certified Product Engineer (Continuous Engineer), IA $77,875
A-22250-17757 2023-08-24 certified H&D NAM Offer Procurement Leader, IA $151,029
A-22125-50640 2023-07-19 certified Sr. Electrical Engineer, OH $91,187
A-22159-68014 2023-05-16 certified Technical Architect, TN $81,411
A-22074-25449 2023-02-09 certified Senior Computer Integration Engineer, TN $100,027
A-22073-24753 2023-02-09 certified Plant Procurement Leader, MA $120,307
A-22075-26051 2023-02-08 certified COE Controller, Digital Energy, MA $130,104
The other 17
A-22044-10840 2023-02-08 certified Offer Firmware Lead, NC $172,016
A-22075-26107 2023-01-26 certified Senior Test Automation Engineer, TN $53,102
A-22011-96137 2023-01-24 certified Technical Product Owner, TN $100,027
A-22011-96154 2023-01-24 certified Planning Controller, TX $106,267
A-21337-80993 2022-12-14 certified Project Manager – Technology Platforms, MA $107,598
A-21236-35252 2022-12-14 certified Application Marketer, NC $118,964
A-21337-80942 2022-11-23 certified Financial Analyst, IL $50,773
A-21329-77987 2022-11-22 certified Software QA & Validation Engineer, MA $68,432
A-21328-77953 2022-11-22 certified Senior Software Test Engineer, MA $88,005
A-21328-77578 2022-11-22 certified Senior Salesforce Developer, TN $100,027
A-21329-77959 2022-11-09 certified Senior Software Test Engineer, MA $88,005
A-21207-22198 2022-09-29 certified Senior Salesforce Developer, TN $110,573
A-21315-71443 2022-09-26 certified Customer Solution Manager, MA $122,699
A-21236-35167 2022-07-12 certified Ecostruxure Competency Center Consultant, MA $120,390
A-21271-50741 2022-06-27 certified Product Configuration Engineer, TN $96,263
A-21204-21454 2022-05-18 certified Energy Automation Engineer, TX $111,446
A-21179-08474 2022-03-23 certified Technical Product Owner, TN $97,386

Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023

From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.

Country of citizenship

  • India 84
  • Mexico 43
  • China 9
  • France 6
  • Brazil 5
  • Canada 4

Worker's education

  • Bachelor's 105
  • Master's 66
  • Associate's 4
  • None 3
  • Doctorate 1

Visa held when filed

  • H-1B 107
  • L-1 62
  • TN 4
  • E-3 1
  • F-1 1
  • H-1B1 1

Schools

  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO 6
  • UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DE NUEVO LEON 4
  • ANNA UNIVERSITY 3
  • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY 3
  • INSTITUTO POLITECNICO NACIONAL 3
  • INSTITUTO TECNOLOGICO Y DE ESTUDIOS SUPERIORES DE MONTERREY 3

Fields of study

  • ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 29
  • MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 18
  • ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 16
  • BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 14
  • INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING 11
  • COMPUTER ENGINEERING 6

Notes on these numbers

What this rank counts, and what it doesn't

DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The 9 entries below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #447 counts this page's cases only.

57 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.

What these numbers don't say

5 notes
The wage is the job, not the payer
Their filings are led by Electrical Engineers, 13 of 81. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
Volume doesn’t change the wait
DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 81 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
The name is a legal entity
DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 447. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
A median over 80 decided cases
The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
Two sources, and they do not add up
The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is MA. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.

The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built

Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load

Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 25, 2026 · daily

What each source includes

Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.

Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.

Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.

Cite this page