PERM Tracker
Live DOL data · Automatic deadlines
Skip to main content

Updated

PERM sponsor, #317 of 70,985 by filings

Randstad Technologies, LLC

Main job
Software Developers · 62% of its filings
Main worksite
Woburn, MA · 100% of its filings
Industry
Custom Computer Programming Services · NAICS 541511

Waiting on a case with Randstad Technologies, LLC?

  • When it'll likely be decided
  • An email when DOL moves it

It's on your ETA-9089 receipt. It goes into the page's address, so you can bookmark the result.

Don't have the number? Find it among their filings.

Or follow this employer by email

Filings

117

#317 of 70,985

Certified

117

0 denied

Approval

100.0%

field 96.8%

Median wage

$150,200

offered, per year

Median days

394

72 faster than the field

Right now

DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.

In the queue right now 33 cases in the live tracker

Nothing for this sponsor is waiting on a decision. All 33 of their cases in the live tracker are closed.

All 33 of this sponsor's cases in DOL's live status are decided: nothing of theirs is in the queue. Live case tracker, as of October 19, 2026

Follow Randstad Technologies, LLC

An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.

What DOL has done to its cases as a group

Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.

You confirm by email first. One click turns it off.

How long it takes

How long their cases are taking

  1. Every employer

    median of 28,776 decisions in the same 90 days

    302 days

None of their cases were decided in the last 90 days, too few for a median of their own. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.

Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 80,916 cases, and would be decided around March 15, 2027 (between February 23, 2027 and April 24, 2027). Estimate another date

Every program

Across DOL's programs

The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.

PERM (green card)
117 published
0 pending
$150,200 median, n=117
Prevailing wage requests
59 published
0 pending
$135,304 median, n=59
H-1B labor condition applications
4,437 published
0 pending
$120,000 median, n=4,432

Its median H-1B wage is $120,000 across 4,432 LCAs, 20.1% lower than its median PERM wage of $150,200 across 117 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.

Every case across these programs is in the search.

How these are counted

Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name, read under the 2 spellings DOL's files use for it; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.

Its newest wage requests and LCAs

Filed by Randstad Technologies, LLC, newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.

Wage requests

  • P-100-23231-279180 Senior Software Developer $135,304 per year 2023-08-19 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
  • P-100-23223-257843 Senior Software Developer $135,304 per year 2023-08-11 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
  • P-100-23221-250097 Assistant IT Product Manager $128,627 per year 2023-08-09 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
  • P-100-23214-233435 Senior Software Developer $135,304 per year 2023-08-02 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
  • P-100-23214-233038 Senior Software Developer $157,643 per year 2023-08-02 · DETERMINATION ISSUED

All wage requests by this employer

H-1B LCAs

All H-1B LCAs by this employer

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

What its H-1B LCAs were for

From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 4,437 LCAs filed by Randstad Technologies, LLC, 4,318 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.

New hires and transfers

507 positions for new employment, 1,922 moving here from another employer.

  • New employment 7a 507 · 12%
  • Change of employer 7e 1,922 · 45%
  • Continuing 7b 1,350 · 31%
  • Change in previous employment 7c 1 · 1%
  • Concurrent employment 7d 1 · 1%
  • Amended petition 7f 537 · 12%

Shares of the 4,318 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.

What each box on the form means
  • New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
  • Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
  • Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
  • Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
  • Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
  • Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.

Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.

Wage level it chose

  • Level I 1 · 1%
  • Level II 2,835 · 66%
  • Level III 1,476 · 34%
  • Level IV 2 · 1%

Shares of the 4,314 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 4 of 4,318 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.

What it declared on Section H

H-1B-dependent
No
Found a willful violator
No

As answered on its newest LCA, filed August 31, 2023. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 3,834 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 4,423. Both are the employer's own answers.

What the two answers mean

H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.

Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.

Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR

Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 4,423 · E-3 (Australia) 11 · H-1B1 (Singapore) 3. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.

Against other sponsors

Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.

Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.

  • PERM approval rate

    100.0% of 117 decided PERM cases

    Higher than 67% of the 1,343 sponsors with 30 or more decided cases.

  • USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years

    86.4% of 147 USCIS decisions

    Higher than 2% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.

Position in the field 1,343 sponsors with 30+ decided

Approval rate

100.0%ahead of 34%, level with 891 more

0% 100%

Median days to decision

394 daysahead of 91%

5d 1152d
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. Sponsors with fewer than 30 decided cases are left out of the population rather than plotted, because a rate over a handful of cases lands wherever the handful landed. The line marks this one.
DOL PERM disclosure files

Against the sponsors ranked nearest

The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 98 and 146 filings.

Their median wait
471 days
This one
394 days

This one sits 77 days ahead of them.

Why no approval rate

A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.

Where this sits in the ranking

Ranked 317 of 70,985 by volume: 316 filed at least as many filings, and 70,668 filed no more.

Just above
Rockwell Collins Inc. 117 filings
Just below
Confluent, Inc. 116 filings

Sponsors filing at the same rate

Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.

Sponsors hiring for the same work

The employers filing the most PERM cases for Software Developers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.

What they file, and where

A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.

What the jobs are

Software Developers

SOC 15-1252.00 · 72 filings, 62% of everything they file · 100.0% approved

How this is counted

These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 90 of 117 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.

The industry they declared

Custom Computer Programming Services

NAICS 541511 · 78 filings

  • Computer Systems Design and Related Services 5415139
How this is counted

The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.

Where the jobs are

  • Massachusetts 117
How this is counted

The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. This state covers 117 of 117 filings.

Where the work is

  • Woburn, MA 117
How this is counted

The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. This city covers 117 of 117 filings.

Who files for them

  1. Randstad Technologies, LLC 33 filings · 100.0% approved
How this is counted

The law firm named on the application. 33 of 117 filings, 28% of the total.

Newspapers it advertised in

  1. The Boston Globe

    33 cases
How this is counted

The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.

Additional steps it used

  1. Employee referral programs

    33 cases

  2. The employer's website

    33 cases

  3. Job search websites

    33 cases
How this is counted

The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.

How long before filing it began

  1. Under 30 days

    0.0%

  2. 30 to 59 days

    0.0%

  3. 60 to 89 days

    94%

  4. 90 to 119 days

    6.1%

  5. 120 to 149 days

    0.0%

  6. 150 to 180 days

    0.0%

  7. Over 180 days

    0.0%
How this is counted

Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.

Where every PERM employer recruits

History

Year by year since 2012

2,357 PERM decisions from FY2012 to FY2025, busiest in FY2016 with 290.

  • certified
  • denied
  • withdrawn

Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2025 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.

Every year as a table
Fiscal year Certified Denied Withdrawn
FY2012 58 1 0
FY2013 63 3 9
FY2014 199 4 7
FY2015 160 4 17
FY2016 279 1 10
FY2017 237 0 1
FY2018 221 1 1
FY2019 237 1 2
FY2020 191 0 1
FY2021 233 0 1
FY2022 154 0 2
FY2023 142 0 0
FY2024 109 0 0
FY2025 8 0 0

Decided in FY2016 to FY2023

The 25 most recent of 1,715. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.

Case Decided Outcome Job Offered wage
A-22270-28861 2023-09-01 certified Senior Data Engineer, MA $139,500
A-22270-28853 2023-09-01 certified Senior Software Quality Assurance Automation Tester, MA $126,450
A-22270-28867 2023-09-01 certified Senior Software Developer, MA $150,200
A-22270-28860 2023-09-01 certified Senior Software Developer, MA $157,500
A-22270-28854 2023-09-01 certified Senior Software Developer, MA $150,200
A-22270-28837 2023-09-01 certified Senior Software Developer, MA $150,200
A-22270-28864 2023-09-01 certified Senior DataStage Administrator, MA $135,950
A-22240-13037 2023-08-30 certified Senior Software Developer, MA $139,950
The other 17
A-22240-13041 2023-08-03 certified Software Developer, MA $157,500
A-22240-13040 2023-08-03 certified Senior Software Developer, MA $120,000
A-22238-12603 2023-08-02 certified Software Developer, MA $150,200
A-22240-13039 2023-08-02 certified Senior Software Developer, MA $139,950
A-22240-13038 2023-08-02 certified Senior Software Developer, MA $139,950
A-22238-12586 2023-08-02 certified Senior Software Developer, MA $145,500
A-22222-03406 2023-08-02 certified Senior Software Developer, MA $139,950
A-22188-84808 2023-08-01 certified Senior Business System Analyst, MA $150,000
A-22131-53563 2023-08-01 certified Network Engineer, MA $156,950
A-22188-84871 2023-07-14 certified Senior Systems Engineer, MA $110,000
A-22188-84876 2023-07-14 certified Senior Software Developer, MA $139,950
A-22188-84874 2023-07-14 certified Senior Software Test Engineer, MA $139,950
A-22188-84873 2023-07-14 certified Senior Software Developer, MA $139,950
A-22188-84869 2023-07-14 certified Senior Software Developer, MA $139,950
A-22195-88768 2023-07-03 certified Senior Software Quality Assurance Test Engineer, MA $121,985
A-22195-88765 2023-07-03 certified Senior Software Quality Assurance Engineer, MA $111,300
A-22195-88703 2023-07-03 certified Senior Software Quality Assurance Test Engineer, MA $114,250

Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023

From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.

Country of citizenship

  • India 1,678
  • China 9
  • Canada 5
  • Nepal 5
  • Nigeria 2
  • Taiwan 2

Worker's education

  • Bachelor's 1,105
  • Master's 608
  • Doctorate 1
  • None 1

Visa held when filed

  • H-1B 1,709
  • E-3 1

Schools

  • ANNA UNIVERSITY 256
  • JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 113
  • ANNA UNIVERSITY CHENNAI 54
  • OSMANIA UNIVERSITY 43
  • UNIVERSITY OF MADRAS 41
  • ANDHRA UNIVERSITY 33

Fields of study

  • COMPUTER ENGINEERING 174
  • INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 173
  • COMPUTER APPLICATIONS 166
  • COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING 153
  • COMPUTER SCIENCE 143
  • ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING 111

Notes on these numbers

What this rank counts, and what it doesn't

DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The 2 entries below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #317 counts this page's cases only.

188 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.

What these numbers don't say

5 notes
The wage is the job, not the payer
Their filings are led by Software Developers, 72 of 117. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
Volume doesn’t change the wait
DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 117 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
The name is a legal entity
DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 317. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
A median over 117 decided cases
The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
Two sources, and they do not add up
The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is MA. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.

The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built

Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load

Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 19, 2026 · daily

What each source includes

Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.

Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.

Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.

Cite this page