PERM Tracker
Live DOL data · Automatic deadlines
Skip to main content

Updated

PERM sponsor, #9,826 of 70,985 by filings

Nalco Company LLC

Main job
Marketing Managers · 50% of its filings
Main worksite
Beaumont, TX · 25% of its filings
Industry
Water Supply and Irrigation Systems · NAICS 221310

Waiting on a case with Nalco Company LLC?

  • When it'll likely be decided
  • An email when DOL moves it

It's on your ETA-9089 receipt. It goes into the page's address, so you can bookmark the result.

Don't have the number? Find it among their filings.

Or follow this employer by email

Too few cases for a rate

4 decided filings: too few for an approval rate.

Why

Across every PERM case DOL decided in this window, 3.20% were denied. At that rate a file this size comes back clean most of the time whatever the sponsor did, so a percentage would be a fact about how few cases there are. Telling a clean record apart from the field takes about 117 decided cases.

Filings

4

#9,826 of 70,985

Certified

4

0 denied

Approval

Not shown

withheld: 4 decided

Median wage

$178,173

offered, per year

Median days

468

middle of 4 decided

Right now

DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.

In the queue right now 3 cases in the live tracker

Nothing for this sponsor is waiting on a decision. All 3 of their cases in the live tracker are closed.

All 3 of this sponsor's cases in DOL's live status are decided: nothing of theirs is in the queue. Live case tracker, as of October 26, 2026

Follow Nalco Company LLC

An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.

What DOL has done to its cases as a group

Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.

You confirm by email first. One click turns it off.

How long it takes

How long their cases are taking

  1. Every employer

    median of 32,344 decisions in the same 90 days

    301 days

None of their cases were decided in the last 90 days, too few for a median of their own. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.

Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 80,263 cases, and would be decided around March 25, 2027 (between March 5, 2027 and May 4, 2027). Estimate another date

Every program

Across DOL's programs

The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.

PERM (green card)
4 published
0 pending
4 wages, under the floor
Prevailing wage requests
6 published
1 pending
6 wages, under the floor
H-1B labor condition applications
31 published
0 pending
$125,000 median, n=31

Every case across these programs is in the search.

How these are counted

Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name, read under the 3 spellings DOL's files use for it; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.

Its newest wage requests and LCAs

Filed by Nalco Company LLC, newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.

Wage requests

  • P-100-26219-153717 North America Segment Marketing Manager 2026-08-07 · IN PROCESS
  • P-100-26168-025069 Financial Analysis Manager 2026-06-17 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
  • P-100-26064-683092 Marketing Manager $156,125 per year 2026-03-05 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
  • P-100-25098-841098 District Representative I $95,472 per year 2025-04-08 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
  • P-100-23270-387773 Director Technical Consulting $126,152 per year 2023-09-27 · DETERMINATION ISSUED

All wage requests by this employer

H-1B LCAs

All H-1B LCAs by this employer

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

What its H-1B LCAs were for

From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 31 LCAs filed by Nalco Company LLC, 29 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.

New hires and transfers

6 positions for new employment, 10 moving here from another employer.

  • New employment 7a 6 · 21%
  • Change of employer 7e 10 · 34%
  • Continuing 7b 8 · 28%
  • Change in previous employment 7c 3 · 10%
  • Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
  • Amended petition 7f 2 · 7%

Shares of the 29 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.

What each box on the form means
  • New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
  • Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
  • Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
  • Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
  • Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
  • Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.

Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.

Wage level it chose

  • Level I 5 · 17%
  • Level II 12 · 41%
  • Level III 10 · 34%
  • Level IV 2 · 7%

Shares of the 29 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 0 of 29 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.

What it declared on Section H

H-1B-dependent
No
Found a willful violator
No

As answered on its newest LCA, filed May 28, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 24 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 26. Both are the employer's own answers.

What the two answers mean

H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.

Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.

Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR

Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 26 · E-3 (Australia) 5. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.

Against other sponsors

Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.

Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.

  • H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months

    8 certified in the last 24 months

    Higher than 67% of the 27,823 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.

Position in the field 1,343 sponsors with 30+ decided

Approval rate

not shownunder 30 decided

0% 100%

Median days to decision

468 daysmiddle of 4 decided, too few to rank

5d 1152d
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. Sponsors with fewer than 30 decided cases are left out of the population rather than plotted, because a rate over a handful of cases lands wherever the handful landed. This sponsor has 4 decided cases, so its median days is marked but left unranked, and no approval rate is drawn at all.
DOL PERM disclosure files

Against the sponsors ranked nearest

The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed 4 filings each.

Their median wait
486 days
This one
468 days

This one sits 18 days ahead of them.

Why no approval rate

A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.

Where this sits in the ranking

Ranked 9,826 of 70,985 by volume: 9,825 filed at least as many filings, and 61,159 filed no more.

Just above
Jam Boro Inc. 4 filings
Just below
World Depot Inc. 4 filings

Sponsors filing at the same rate

Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.

Sponsors hiring for the same work

The employers filing the most PERM cases for Marketing Managers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.

What they file, and where

A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.

What the jobs are

Marketing Managers

SOC 11-2021.00 · 2 filings, 50% of everything they file

How this is counted

These are the 3 occupations with the most filings, 4 of 4 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.

The industry they declared

Water Supply and Irrigation Systems

NAICS 221310 · 3 filings

  • Basic Chemical Manufacturing 32511
How this is counted

The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.

Where the jobs are

  • Texas 2
  • Illinois 1
  • Minnesota 1
How this is counted

The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 3 states cover 4 of 4 filings.

Where the work is

  • Beaumont, TX 1
  • Houston, TX 1
  • Naperville, IL 1
  • Saint Paul, MN 1
How this is counted

The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 4 cities cover 4 of 4 filings.

Who files for them

  1. Seyfarth Shaw LLP 4 filings
How this is counted

The law firm named on the application. 4 of 4 filings, 100% of the total.

Newspapers it advertised in

  1. Beaumont Enterprise

    1 cases

  2. Chicago Tribune

    1 cases

  3. Houston Chronicle

    1 cases
How this is counted

The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.

Additional steps it used

  1. The employer's website

    3 cases

  2. Job search websites

    3 cases

  3. Local or ethnic newspapers

    3 cases
How this is counted

The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.

How long before filing it began

  1. Under 30 days

    0.0%

  2. 30 to 59 days

    0.0%

  3. 60 to 89 days

    33%

  4. 90 to 119 days

    0.0%

  5. 120 to 149 days

    33%

  6. 150 to 180 days

    33%

  7. Over 180 days

    0.0%
How this is counted

Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.

Where every PERM employer recruits

History

Year by year since 2008

59 PERM decisions from FY2008 to FY2026, busiest in FY2015 with 11.

  • certified
  • denied
  • withdrawn

Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.

Every year as a table
Fiscal year Certified Denied Withdrawn
FY2008 1 0 0
FY2009 3 0 0
FY2010 2 0 0
FY2011 1 0 0
FY2012 7 0 0
FY2013 9 0 0
FY2014 7 0 0
FY2015 11 0 0
FY2016 8 0 0
FY2017 5 0 0
FY2018 0 0 0
FY2019 0 0 0
FY2020 0 0 0
FY2021 0 0 0
FY2022 0 0 0
FY2023 1 0 0
FY2024 1 0 0
FY2025 2 0 0
FY2026 1 0 0

Decided in FY2016 to FY2023

All 14. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.

Case Decided Outcome Job Offered wage
A-22122-49121 2023-01-25 certified Senior Marketing Manager, IL $174,325
A-17123-33375 2017-09-20 certified Lead Chemical Engineer, IL $101,160
A-17058-07269 2017-09-14 certified District Representative I, TX $82,493
A-17096-21604 2017-07-28 certified Quality Control Chemist II, TX $49,604
A-16200-33690 2017-03-30 certified Sr. Chemist, TX $91,683
A-16175-25093 2016-10-24 certified Principal Chemist, TX $93,352
A-16173-24156 2016-08-31 certified Product Manager, TX $120,723
A-16062-78931 2016-07-08 certified Account Manager, CA $71,200
The other 6
A-16028-66360 2016-06-23 certified Senior Compliance Analyst, IL $63,503
A-16013-60698 2016-05-25 certified District Representative III, CA $71,450
A-15208-02389 2016-03-09 certified Lead IT Business Process Analyst, IL $118,000
A-15139-77695 2015-12-08 certified Lead IT Developer, TX $110,926
A-15028-46178 2015-11-09 certified Reservoir Engineer, CO $113,152
A-15078-59904 2015-10-09 certified Senior Account Manager - Oilfield Chemicals, TX $127,504

Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023

From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.

Country of citizenship

  • India 6
  • Argentina 1
  • Australia 1
  • China 1
  • Indonesia 1
  • Iran 1

Worker's education

  • Master's 7
  • Bachelor's 4
  • Doctorate 3

Visa held when filed

  • H-1B 12
  • L-1 1
  • L-2 1

Schools

  • UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON 2
  • ANDHRA UNIVERSITY 1
  • COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES 1
  • CURTIN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 1
  • DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 1
  • INDIANA UNIVERSITY, KELLEY SCHOOL OF BUSINESS 1

Fields of study

  • BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 3
  • CHEMISTRY 3
  • CHEMICAL ENGINEERING 2
  • PETROLEUM ENGINEERING 2
  • CIVIL ENGINEERING 1
  • COMPUTER SCIENCE 1

Notes on these numbers

What these numbers don't say

5 notes
The wage is the job, not the payer
Their filings are led by Marketing Managers, 2 of 4. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
Volume doesn’t change the wait
DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 4 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
The name is a legal entity
DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 9,826. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
A median over 4 decided cases
That’s a middle of a handful, and it moves entirely with which months those few cases were filed in.
Two sources, and they do not add up
The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is TX. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.

The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built

Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load

Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 26, 2026 · daily

What each source includes

Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.

Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.

Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.

Cite this page