PERM Tracker
Live DOL data · Automatic deadlines
Skip to main content

Updated

PERM sponsor, #2,212 of 70,985 by filings

Marsh USA LLC

Marsh USA LLC sponsors green cards: it filed 11 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on October 21, 2026. Marsh USA LLC has 8 PERM cases waiting with DOL.

Main job
Actuaries · 15% of its filings
Main worksite
New York, NY · 35% of its filings
Industry
Reinsurance Carriers · NAICS 524130

Waiting on a case with Marsh USA LLC?

  • When it'll likely be decided
  • An email when DOL moves it

It's on your ETA-9089 receipt. It goes into the page's address, so you can bookmark the result.

Don't have the number? Find it among their filings.

Or follow this employer by email

Too few cases for a rate

19 decided filings: too few for an approval rate.

Why

Across every PERM case DOL decided in this window, 3.20% were denied. At that rate a file this size comes back clean most of the time whatever the sponsor did, so a percentage would be a fact about how few cases there are. Telling a clean record apart from the field takes about 117 decided cases.

Filings

20

#2,212 of 70,985

Certified

19

0 denied

Approval

Not shown

withheld: 19 decided

Median wage

$145,000

offered, per year

Median days

476

10 slower than the field

Right now

DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.

In the queue right now 32 cases in the live tracker

Waiting on a decision

8

of 32 tracked cases. The other 24 have been decided.

The oldest one still waiting was filed January 27, 2026, 8 months ago.

Where those 8 are standing

ANALYST REVIEW
8100%

A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.

None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.

From DOL's live status of 32 of this sponsor's cases: read this share against 32, never against the lifetime filings above. Live case tracker, as of October 22, 2026

Follow Marsh USA LLC

An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.

What DOL has done to its cases as a group

Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.

You confirm by email first. One click turns it off.

Its newest filings

Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.

  • G-100-26294-314842 Senior Surety Advisor filed 2026-10-21 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26227-171339 Engagement Lead – Risk Consulting/ CONSULT MGR I filed 2026-08-15 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26204-121703 Energy and Power Senior Insurance Specialist filed 2026-07-23 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26201-112291 Client Relationship Management - Senior Specialist filed 2026-07-20 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26169-029552 Senior Client Advisor, Cyber Practice filed 2026-06-18 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26168-022876 Client Executive, US Energy & Power Specialty filed 2026-06-17 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26141-939237 Senior Property Advisor filed 2026-05-21 · ANALYST REVIEW
  • G-100-26027-593714 Specialist II - Financial and Strategy Advisory filed 2026-01-27 · ANALYST REVIEW

The 8 newest. Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

How long it takes

How long their cases are taking

  1. Every employer

    median of 30,882 decisions in the same 90 days

    301 days

Only 3 of their cases were decided in the last 90 days, too few for a median of their own. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.

Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 80,100 cases, and would be decided around March 19, 2027 (between February 27, 2027 and April 28, 2027). Estimate another date

Every program

Across DOL's programs

The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.

PERM (green card)
20 published
8 pending
$145,000 median, n=20
Prevailing wage requests
45 published
5 pending
$121,389 median, n=45
H-1B labor condition applications
270 published
0 pending
$119,600 median, n=270

Its median H-1B wage is $119,600 across 270 LCAs, 17.5% lower than its median PERM wage of $145,000 across 20 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.

Every case across these programs is in the search.

How these are counted

Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name, read under the 2 spellings DOL's files use for it; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.

Its newest wage requests and LCAs

Filed by Marsh USA LLC, newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.

Wage requests

All wage requests by this employer

H-1B LCAs

All H-1B LCAs by this employer

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

What its H-1B LCAs were for

From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 270 LCAs filed by Marsh USA LLC, 264 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.

New hires and transfers

105 positions for new employment, 53 moving here from another employer.

  • New employment 7a 105 · 40%
  • Change of employer 7e 53 · 20%
  • Continuing 7b 66 · 25%
  • Change in previous employment 7c 24 · 9%
  • Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
  • Amended petition 7f 16 · 6%

Shares of the 264 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.

What each box on the form means
  • New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
  • Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
  • Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
  • Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
  • Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
  • Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.

Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.

Wage level it chose

  • Level I 47 · 20%
  • Level II 35 · 15%
  • Level III 24 · 10%
  • Level IV 130 · 55%

Shares of the 236 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 28 of 264 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.

What it declared on Section H

H-1B-dependent
No
Found a willful violator
No

As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 23, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 230 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 253. Both are the employer's own answers.

What the two answers mean

H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.

Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.

Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR

Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 252 · E-3 (Australia) 18. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.

Against other sponsors

Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.

Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.

  • PERM filings in the last 12 months

    11 filed in the last 12 months

    Higher than 91% of the 14,014 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.

  • H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months

    34 certified in the last 24 months

    Higher than 89% of the 27,873 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.

  • Share of H-1B positions that were transfers

    2.7% of 37 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 11% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.

  • Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV

    80% of 30 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 92% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.

  • USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years

    100.0% of 48 USCIS decisions

    Higher than 80% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.

Position in the field 1,343 sponsors with 30+ decided

Approval rate

not shownunder 30 decided

0% 100%

Median days to decision

476 daysmiddle of 19 decided, too few to rank

5d 1152d
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. Sponsors with fewer than 30 decided cases are left out of the population rather than plotted, because a rate over a handful of cases lands wherever the handful landed. This sponsor has 19 decided cases, so its median days is marked but left unranked, and no approval rate is drawn at all.
DOL PERM disclosure files

Against the sponsors ranked nearest

The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 20 and 21 filings.

Their median wait
460 days
This one
476 days

This one sits 16 days behind them.

Why no approval rate

A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.

Where this sits in the ranking

Ranked 2,212 of 70,985 by volume: 2,211 filed at least as many filings, and 68,773 filed no more.

Just above
E2 Consulting Engineers, Inc. 20 filings
Just below
HDR Architecture, Inc. 20 filings

Sponsors filing at the same rate

Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.

Sponsors hiring for the same work

The employers filing the most PERM cases for Actuaries, the occupation this sponsor files for most.

What they file, and where

A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.

What the jobs are

Actuaries

SOC 15-2011.00 · 3 filings, 15% of everything they file

How this is counted

These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 11 of 20 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.

The industry they declared

Reinsurance Carriers

NAICS 524130 · 14 filings

  • Insurance Agencies and Brokerages 5242106
How this is counted

The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.

Where the jobs are

  • New York 7
  • California 4
  • Massachusetts 3
  • Arizona 2
  • Texas 2
  • Illinois 1
How this is counted

The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 6 states cover 19 of 20 filings.

Where the work is

  • New York, NY 7
  • Boston, MA 3
  • Los Angeles, CA 2
  • Phoenix, AZ 2
  • Chicago, IL 1
  • Houston, TX 1
How this is counted

The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 6 cities cover 16 of 20 filings.

Who files for them

  1. Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP 19 filings
How this is counted

The law firm named on the application. 19 of 20 filings, 95% of the total.

Newspapers it advertised in

  1. The New York Times

    7 cases

  2. The Boston Globe

    2 cases

  3. The Arizona Republic

    1 cases

  4. Boston Sunday Globe

    1 cases

  5. Chicago Tribune

    1 cases

  6. Houston Chronicle

    1 cases
How this is counted

The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.

Additional steps it used

  1. The employer's website

    16 cases

  2. Job search websites

    16 cases

  3. Local or ethnic newspapers

    16 cases
How this is counted

The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.

How long before filing it began

  1. Under 30 days

    0.0%

  2. 30 to 59 days

    0.0%

  3. 60 to 89 days

    13%

  4. 90 to 119 days

    25%

  5. 120 to 149 days

    19%

  6. 150 to 180 days

    44%

  7. Over 180 days

    0.0%
How this is counted

Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.

Where every PERM employer recruits

History

Year by year since 2011

76 PERM decisions from FY2011 to FY2026, busiest in FY2012 with 10.

  • certified
  • denied
  • withdrawn

Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.

Every year as a table
Fiscal year Certified Denied Withdrawn
FY2011 1 0 0
FY2012 10 0 0
FY2013 0 0 0
FY2014 5 0 0
FY2015 2 0 0
FY2016 5 0 0
FY2017 4 0 0
FY2018 8 0 0
FY2019 5 0 0
FY2020 1 0 0
FY2021 6 0 0
FY2022 5 0 0
FY2023 4 0 0
FY2024 4 0 0
FY2025 8 0 0
FY2026 7 0 1

Decided in FY2016 to FY2023

The 25 most recent of 38. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.

Case Decided Outcome Job Offered wage
A-22215-99116 2023-08-28 certified Senior Product Specialist / Product Owner, NY $105,000
A-22200-90507 2023-06-30 certified Big Data and ETL Engineer (Senior Applications Developer), AZ $160,000
A-22175-78227 2023-04-04 certified IT Business Analysis Specialist, NY $100,000
A-22133-55063 2023-02-27 certified Senior Data Scientist, NY $92,019
A-21314-71385 2022-08-09 certified Senior Risk Consultant, Property Risk Consulting, CA $128,877
A-21260-45933 2022-05-02 certified Senior Technical Support Specialist, TX $116,101
A-21208-22855 2022-04-04 certified Placement Specialist, NY $130,000
A-21208-22786 2022-02-17 certified Consultant- Risk Consulting, GA $87,000
The other 17
A-21194-16105 2022-01-05 certified VP, Lead Applications Developer, AZ $150,000
A-20267-02876 2021-08-31 certified Leader-Applications Development, NY $150,000
A-21008-40081 2021-07-09 certified Client Advisor - Vice President, NY $119,725
A-20240-92515 2021-05-24 certified Senior Project Manager, IL $110,000
A-20182-71081 2021-05-17 certified Senior Application Developer, NY $138,000
A-20255-98597 2021-04-27 certified Scrum Master, AZ $120,000
A-20128-51473 2020-11-16 certified Senior Specialist – Operations Storage Management, CA $109,000
A-19184-26727 2020-03-11 certified Vice President, Placement Specialist, NY $170,000
A-19063-78621 2019-07-02 certified Senior Placement Specialist - Excess Construction Leader, NY $190,000
A-18307-37267 2019-05-03 certified Team Leader, NY $135,000
A-18207-01730 2019-03-22 certified Senior Advisory Specialist, IL $131,500
A-18255-17737 2019-01-07 certified Producer, CA $160,000
A-18227-07990 2018-10-26 certified SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST II, NY $101,000
A-18029-36493 2018-06-21 certified HR Program Manager/HRBP, NY $118,000
A-17300-04127 2018-06-08 certified Client Advisor I, NY $125,020
A-18009-28986 2018-05-21 certified VP, Analyst Operations, NY $116,500
A-17311-07673 2018-04-18 certified Associate Advisory Specialist, IL $68,536

Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023

From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.

Country of citizenship

  • India 13
  • United Kingdom 5
  • Brazil 2
  • Canada 2
  • France 2
  • Japan 2

Worker's education

  • Bachelor's 22
  • Master's 13
  • Other 2
  • None 1

Visa held when filed

  • H-1B 26
  • L-1 9
  • O-1 2
  • E-3 1

Schools

  • COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2
  • AA INSURANCE LIMITED (F/K/A ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE) 1
  • BELOIT COLLEGE 1
  • BOSTON UNIVERSITY 1
  • BROWN UNIVERSITY 1
  • CANDIDO MENDES UNIVERSITY 1

Fields of study

  • BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 3
  • BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (US EQUIVALENT) 2
  • ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 2
  • HISTORY 2
  • INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2
  • ACCOUNTING 1

Notes on these numbers

What this rank counts, and what it doesn't

DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The 4 entries below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #2,212 counts this page's cases only.

109 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.

What these numbers don't say

5 notes
The wage is the job, not the payer
Their filings are led by Actuaries, 3 of 20. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
Volume doesn’t change the wait
DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 20 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
The name is a legal entity
DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 2,212. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
A median over 19 decided cases
The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
Two sources, and they do not add up
The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is NY. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.

The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built

Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load

Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 22, 2026 · daily

What each source includes

Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.

Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.

Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.

Cite this page