PERM Tracker
Live DOL data · Automatic deadlines
Skip to main content

Updated

PERM sponsor, #1,051 of 70,985 by filings

Magic Leap, Inc.

Magic Leap, Inc. sponsors green cards: it filed 10 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on September 1, 2026. Magic Leap, Inc. has 8 PERM cases waiting with DOL.

Main job
Software Developers · 41% of its filings
Main worksite
Plantation, FL · 54% of its filings
Industry
Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences · NAICS 54171

Waiting on a case with Magic Leap, Inc.?

  • When it'll likely be decided
  • An email when DOL moves it

It's on your ETA-9089 receipt. It goes into the page's address, so you can bookmark the result.

Don't have the number? Find it among their filings.

Or follow this employer by email

This rate is level with the field

Over 37 decided filings, this rate can't be told apart from the field in either direction.

Why

The 95% interval runs up to a 13.8% denial rate, which still covers the 3.20% the field as a whole records.

Filings

39

#1,051 of 70,985

Certified

36

1 denied

Approval

97.3%

field 96.8%

Median wage

$155,000

offered, per year

Median days

456

10 faster than the field

Right now

DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.

In the queue right now 51 cases in the live tracker

Waiting on a decision

8

of 51 tracked cases. The other 43 have been decided.

The oldest one still waiting was filed December 18, 2025, 10 months ago.

Where those 8 are standing

ANALYST REVIEW
8100%

A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.

None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.

From DOL's live status of 51 of this sponsor's cases: read this share against 51, never against the lifetime filings above. Live case tracker, as of October 19, 2026

Follow Magic Leap, Inc.

An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.

What DOL has done to its cases as a group

Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.

You confirm by email first. One click turns it off.

Its newest filings

Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.

The 8 newest. Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

Layoff notices filed by Magic Leap, Inc.

Notices of a mass layoff or closing filed with the state under the WARN Act, as the state printed them, matched to this sponsor by name. What a layoff means for a PERM.

  • October 1, 2026, layoff permanent, 5 employees, Santa Clara County, effective December 1, 2026. California WARN report 1376 Bordeaux Dr., Sunnyvale CA 94089
  • July 17, 2026, layoff permanent, 76 employees, Santa Clara County, effective October 1, 2026. California WARN report 1376 Bordeaux Dr., Sunnyvale CA 94089
  • April 22, 2020, 8 employees, Collin, effective June 21, 2020. Texas WARN report McKinney

How long it takes

How long their cases are taking

  1. Every employer

    median of 28,615 decisions in the same 90 days

    302 days

Only 2 of their cases were decided in the last 90 days, too few for a median of their own. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.

Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 81,062 cases, and would be decided around March 16, 2027 (between February 24, 2027 and April 25, 2027). Estimate another date

Every program

Across DOL's programs

The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.

PERM (green card)
39 published
8 pending
$155,000 median, n=39
Prevailing wage requests
53 published
4 pending
$149,781 median, n=50
H-1B labor condition applications
381 published
0 pending
$149,736 median, n=380

Its median H-1B wage is $149,736 across 380 LCAs, 3.4% lower than its median PERM wage of $155,000 across 39 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.

Every case across these programs is in the search.

How these are counted

Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.

Its newest wage requests and LCAs

Filed by Magic Leap, Inc., newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.

Wage requests

All wage requests by this employer

H-1B LCAs

All H-1B LCAs by this employer

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

What its H-1B LCAs were for

From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 381 LCAs filed by Magic Leap, Inc., 332 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.

New hires and transfers

89 positions for new employment, 59 moving here from another employer.

  • New employment 7a 89 · 27%
  • Change of employer 7e 59 · 18%
  • Continuing 7b 81 · 24%
  • Change in previous employment 7c 83 · 25%
  • Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
  • Amended petition 7f 20 · 6%

Shares of the 332 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.

What each box on the form means
  • New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
  • Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
  • Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
  • Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
  • Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
  • Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.

Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.

Wage level it chose

  • Level I 16 · 5%
  • Level II 57 · 17%
  • Level III 91 · 27%
  • Level IV 167 · 50%

Shares of the 331 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 1 of 332 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.

What it declared on Section H

H-1B-dependent
No
Found a willful violator
No

As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 23, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 334 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 372. Both are the employer's own answers.

What the two answers mean

H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.

Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.

Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR

Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 371 · E-3 (Australia) 10. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.

Against other sponsors

Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.

Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.

  • PERM approval rate

    97.3% of 37 decided PERM cases

    Higher than 16% of the 1,343 sponsors with 30 or more decided cases.

  • PERM filings in the last 12 months

    10 filed in the last 12 months

    Higher than 90% of the 13,946 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.

  • H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months

    76 certified in the last 24 months

    Higher than 96% of the 27,903 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.

  • Share of H-1B positions that were transfers

    13% of 87 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 46% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.

  • Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV

    70% of 87 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 85% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.

  • USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years

    98.9% of 93 USCIS decisions

    Higher than 54% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.

Position in the field 1,343 sponsors with 30+ decided

Approval rate

97.3%ahead of 16%

0% 100%

Median days to decision

456 daysahead of 61%

5d 1152d
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. Sponsors with fewer than 30 decided cases are left out of the population rather than plotted, because a rate over a handful of cases lands wherever the handful landed. The line marks this one.
DOL PERM disclosure files

Against the sponsors ranked nearest

The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 37 and 41 filings.

Their median wait
464 days
This one
456 days

This one sits 8 days ahead of them.

Why no approval rate

A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.

Where this sits in the ranking

Ranked 1,051 of 70,985 by volume: 1,050 filed at least as many filings, and 69,934 filed no more.

Just above
REI SYSTEMS, INC. 39 filings
Just below
TriNet USA, Inc. 39 filings

Sponsors filing at the same rate

Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.

Sponsors hiring for the same work

The employers filing the most PERM cases for Software Developers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.

What they file, and where

A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.

What the jobs are

Software Developers

SOC 15-1252.00 · 16 filings, 41% of everything they file

How this is counted

These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 27 of 39 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.

The industry they declared

Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

NAICS 54171 · 39 filings

How this is counted

The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.

Where the jobs are

  • Florida 21
  • California 15
  • Texas 3
How this is counted

The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 3 states cover 39 of 39 filings.

Where the work is

  • Plantation, FL 21
  • Sunnyvale, CA 14
  • Austin, TX 3
  • Culver City, CA 1
How this is counted

The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 4 cities cover 39 of 39 filings.

Who files for them

  1. Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP 39 filings · 97.3% approved
How this is counted

The law firm named on the application. 39 of 39 filings, 100% of the total.

Newspapers it advertised in

  1. Sun-Sentinel

    15 cases

  2. San Francisco Chronicle

    14 cases

  3. Austin American-Statesman

    3 cases
How this is counted

The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.

Additional steps it used

  1. Job search websites

    32 cases

  2. Local or ethnic newspapers

    32 cases

  3. Radio or TV ads

    32 cases
How this is counted

The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.

How long before filing it began

  1. Under 30 days

    0.0%

  2. 30 to 59 days

    0.0%

  3. 60 to 89 days

    34%

  4. 90 to 119 days

    31%

  5. 120 to 149 days

    16%

  6. 150 to 180 days

    19%

  7. Over 180 days

    0.0%
How this is counted

Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.

Where every PERM employer recruits

History

Year by year since 2016

155 PERM decisions from FY2016 to FY2026, busiest in FY2019 with 26.

  • certified
  • denied
  • withdrawn

Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.

Every year as a table
Fiscal year Certified Denied Withdrawn
FY2016 2 0 0
FY2017 8 0 2
FY2018 19 0 2
FY2019 26 0 0
FY2020 26 0 0
FY2021 2 0 0
FY2022 14 1 0
FY2023 13 1 0
FY2024 10 0 0
FY2025 14 0 2
FY2026 12 1 0

Decided in FY2016 to FY2023

The 25 most recent of 116. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.

Case Decided Outcome Job Offered wage
A-22276-32512 2023-09-01 certified Senior Computer Vision Researcher/Engineer, CA $165,280
A-22265-26740 2023-08-30 certified Senior Robotics Engineer, FL $132,174
A-22245-16371 2023-08-07 certified Senior Embedded DSP Engineer, Computer Vision, CA $184,080
A-22243-15020 2023-08-02 certified Embedded Software Engineer, FL $120,307
A-21342-83499 2023-07-07 denied Sr. Process Engineer, Reverse Logistics, FL $133,555
A-22231-08969 2023-06-29 certified Senior Manager, Embedded Software Engineering, FL $223,189
A-22228-06750 2023-06-21 certified Senior Business Analyst, Lead to Cash, SAP Sales and Distribution System, FL $136,039
A-22196-89336 2023-06-08 certified Lead Software Engineer, Embedded Algorithms, CA $184,080
The other 17
A-22217-00988 2023-06-01 certified Senior Computer Vision Engineer, Gestures, CA $175,610
A-22152-64380 2023-04-03 certified Director, Business Technology, Design to Operate, FL $190,694
A-22118-47729 2023-02-15 certified Lead SDET Audio, Multimedia, and Graphics, FL $140,114
A-22101-38826 2023-01-11 certified Senior Analyst, Business Technology, Core Data Analysis, FL $89,076
A-21320-73676 2022-10-26 certified Sr. Network Engineer, FL $133,120
A-22024-01989 2022-10-24 certified Software Developer in Test, FL $107,755
A-21344-84873 2022-08-30 certified Senior Software Engineer, Perception, CA $184,080
A-21343-84302 2022-08-15 certified Lead Software Engineer, Embedded Algorithms Development, CA $184,080
A-21293-60945 2022-05-20 certified Manager, Business Technology Services, Hire-to-Retire, FL $175,309
A-21159-97814 2022-05-05 certified Sr. Process Engineer, FL $109,190
A-20070-28965 2022-04-27 denied Graphics Systems Engineer, CA $123,797
A-21228-31966 2022-04-25 certified QA Lead Apps & SDK Integration, FL $117,031
A-21238-36672 2022-03-04 certified Manager, Software Engineer - Graphics, CA $234,840
A-21188-13483 2022-02-22 certified Senior BI Web Portal Developer, FL $116,878
A-21196-17670 2022-01-31 certified Senior Electrical Engineer, FL $128,300
A-21200-19267 2022-01-28 certified Senior Software Engineer, FL $117,128
A-21153-94848 2021-11-29 certified Senior Software Engineer, FL $127,423

Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023

From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.

Country of citizenship

  • India 65
  • China 13
  • Canada 9
  • Taiwan 5
  • Australia 2
  • Brazil 2

Worker's education

  • Master's 67
  • Bachelor's 39
  • Doctorate 7
  • Associate's 2
  • High School 1

Visa held when filed

  • H-1B 94
  • F-1 10
  • TN 3
  • E-3 2
  • L-1 2
  • O-1 2

Schools

  • CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY 5
  • UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 5
  • NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY 4
  • STANFORD UNIVERSITY 3
  • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 3
  • UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO 3

Fields of study

  • COMPUTER SCIENCE 22
  • ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 16
  • COMPUTER ENGINEERING 8
  • MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 8
  • COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS 4
  • ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 4

Notes on these numbers

What this rank counts, and what it doesn't

DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The 18 entries below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #1,051 counts this page's cases only.

22 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.

What these numbers don't say

5 notes
The wage is the job, not the payer
Their filings are led by Software Developers, 16 of 39. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
Volume doesn’t change the wait
DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 39 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
The name is a legal entity
DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 1,051. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
A median over 37 decided cases
The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
Two sources, and they do not add up
The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is FL. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.

The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built

Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load

Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 19, 2026 · daily

What each source includes

Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.

Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.

Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.

Cite this page