PERM Tracker
Live DOL data · Automatic deadlines
Skip to main content

Updated

PERM sponsor, #276 of 70,985 by filings

Hughes Network Systems LLC

Hughes Network Systems LLC sponsors green cards: it filed 1 PERM case in the last 12 months, the newest on September 21, 2026. Hughes Network Systems LLC has 3 PERM cases waiting with DOL.

Main job
Software Developers · 28% of its filings
Main worksite
Germantown, MD · 78% of its filings
Industry
Other Communications Equipment Manufacturing · NAICS 33429

Waiting on a case with Hughes Network Systems LLC?

  • When it'll likely be decided
  • An email when DOL moves it

It's on your ETA-9089 receipt. It goes into the page's address, so you can bookmark the result.

Don't have the number? Find it among their filings.

Or follow this employer by email

This rate is level with the field

Over 132 decided filings, this rate can't be told apart from the field in either direction.

Why

The 95% interval runs up to a 4.2% denial rate, which still covers the 3.20% the field as a whole records.

Filings

136

#276 of 70,985

Certified

131

1 denied

Approval

99.2%

field 96.8%

Median wage

$138,258

offered, per year

Median days

474

8 slower than the field

Right now

DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.

In the queue right now 119 cases in the live tracker

Waiting on a decision

3

of 119 tracked cases. The other 116 have been decided.

The oldest one still waiting was filed January 6, 2025, 21 months ago.

Where those 3 are standing

RECONSIDERATION APPEALS
267%

The employer has asked the same officer who denied the case to look at it again, within 30 days of the denial. The request can only use documents DOL already had, so new evidence can't be added to fix what the denial was based on.

ANALYST REVIEW
133%

A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.

None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.

From DOL's live status of 119 of this sponsor's cases: read this share against 119, never against the lifetime filings above. Live case tracker, as of October 22, 2026

Follow Hughes Network Systems LLC

An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.

What DOL has done to its cases as a group

Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.

You confirm by email first. One click turns it off.

Its newest filings

Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.

The 8 newest. Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

How long it takes

How long their cases are taking

  1. Every employer

    median of 30,882 decisions in the same 90 days

    301 days

Only 2 of their cases were decided in the last 90 days, too few for a median of their own. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.

Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 80,100 cases, and would be decided around March 19, 2027 (between February 27, 2027 and April 28, 2027). Estimate another date

Every program

Across DOL's programs

The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.

PERM (green card)
136 published
3 pending
$138,258 median, n=136
Prevailing wage requests
105 published
3 pending
$110,968 median, n=103
H-1B labor condition applications
905 published
0 pending
$106,850 median, n=904

Its median H-1B wage is $106,850 across 904 LCAs, 22.7% lower than its median PERM wage of $138,258 across 136 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.

Every case across these programs is in the search.

How these are counted

Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name, read under the 2 spellings DOL's files use for it; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.

Its newest wage requests and LCAs

Filed by Hughes Network Systems LLC, newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.

Wage requests

All wage requests by this employer

H-1B LCAs

All H-1B LCAs by this employer

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

What its H-1B LCAs were for

From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 905 LCAs filed by Hughes Network Systems LLC, 873 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.

New hires and transfers

299 positions for new employment, 90 moving here from another employer.

  • New employment 7a 299 · 32%
  • Change of employer 7e 90 · 10%
  • Continuing 7b 358 · 38%
  • Change in previous employment 7c 170 · 18%
  • Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
  • Amended petition 7f 22 · 2%

Shares of the 938 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.

What each box on the form means
  • New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
  • Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
  • Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
  • Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
  • Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
  • Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.

Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.

Wage level it chose

  • Level I 276 · 36%
  • Level II 258 · 33%
  • Level III 171 · 22%
  • Level IV 67 · 9%

Shares of the 772 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 101 of 873 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.

What it declared on Section H

H-1B-dependent
No
Found a willful violator
No

As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 23, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 379 of 808 LCAs, and a willful violator on 1 of 901. Both are the employer's own answers.

What the two answers mean

H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.

Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.

Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR

Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 901 · E-3 (Australia) 1 · H-1B1 (Singapore) 3. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.

Against other sponsors

Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.

Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.

  • PERM approval rate

    99.2% of 132 decided PERM cases

    Higher than 27% of the 1,343 sponsors with 30 or more decided cases.

  • PERM filings in the last 12 months

    1 filed in the last 12 months

    Higher than 22% of the 14,014 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.

  • H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months

    177 certified in the last 24 months

    Higher than 98% of the 27,873 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.

  • Share of H-1B positions that were transfers

    1.8% of 216 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 9% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.

  • Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV

    36% of 197 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 53% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.

  • USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years

    96.0% of 329 USCIS decisions

    Higher than 21% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.

Also on its record

  • It declared itself a willful violator on 1 LCA.
Position in the field 1,343 sponsors with 30+ decided

Approval rate

99.2%ahead of 27%

0% 100%

Median days to decision

474 daysahead of 37%

5d 1152d
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. Sponsors with fewer than 30 decided cases are left out of the population rather than plotted, because a rate over a handful of cases lands wherever the handful landed. The line marks this one.
DOL PERM disclosure files

Against the sponsors ranked nearest

The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 109 and 181 filings.

Their median wait
468 days
This one
474 days

This one sits 6 days behind them.

Why no approval rate

A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.

Where this sits in the ranking

Ranked 276 of 70,985 by volume: 275 filed at least as many filings, and 70,709 filed no more.

Just above
Perficient, Inc. 138 filings
Just below
WEST LIBERTY FOODS, LLC 136 filings

Sponsors filing at the same rate

Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.

Sponsors hiring for the same work

The employers filing the most PERM cases for Software Developers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.

What they file, and where

A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.

What the jobs are

Software Developers

SOC 15-1252.00 · 38 filings, 28% of everything they file · 100.0% approved

How this is counted

These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 89 of 136 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.

The industry they declared

Other Communications Equipment Manufacturing

NAICS 33429, 334290 · 85 filings

  • Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing 33422051
How this is counted

The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.

Where the jobs are

  • Maryland 132
  • California 4
How this is counted

The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 2 states cover 136 of 136 filings.

Where the work is

  • Germantown, MD 106
  • Gaithersburg, MD 26
  • San Diego, CA 4
How this is counted

The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 3 cities cover 136 of 136 filings.

Who files for them

  1. Potomac Law Group, PLLC 76 filings · 98.7% approved
  2. Bedi & Martinez, Esqs. 51 filings · 100.0% approved
  3. Jackson Lewis P.C. 8 filings
How this is counted

The law firm named on the application. 135 of 136 filings, 99% of the total.

Newspapers it advertised in

  1. The Washington Post

    103 cases

  2. The San Diego Union-Tribune

    4 cases
How this is counted

The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.

Additional steps it used

  1. Employee referral programs

    106 cases

  2. The employer's website

    106 cases

  3. Job search websites

    106 cases
How this is counted

The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.

How long before filing it began

  1. Under 30 days

    0.0%

  2. 30 to 59 days

    0.0%

  3. 60 to 89 days

    21%

  4. 90 to 119 days

    34%

  5. 120 to 149 days

    32%

  6. 150 to 180 days

    12%

  7. Over 180 days

    0.9%
How this is counted

Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.

Where every PERM employer recruits

History

Year by year since 2008

517 PERM decisions from FY2008 to FY2026, busiest in FY2019 with 56.

  • certified
  • denied
  • withdrawn

Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.

Every year as a table
Fiscal year Certified Denied Withdrawn
FY2008 17 0 1
FY2009 9 0 1
FY2010 40 0 1
FY2011 9 2 0
FY2012 22 0 2
FY2013 14 0 2
FY2014 26 0 2
FY2015 14 0 1
FY2016 22 0 0
FY2017 27 0 1
FY2018 7 0 1
FY2019 55 1 0
FY2020 25 1 2
FY2021 37 0 1
FY2022 17 0 2
FY2023 17 1 1
FY2024 39 0 2
FY2025 46 0 2
FY2026 46 1 0

Decided in FY2016 to FY2023

The 25 most recent of 218. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.

Case Decided Outcome Job Offered wage
A-22250-17876 2023-09-18 certified Senior Programmer/Analyst I, MD $102,107
A-22271-29887 2023-08-28 certified MTS 3 - Software (Network Devices), MD $141,294
A-22243-14779 2023-08-01 certified Senior Business Data Analyst, MD $102,107
A-22237-11968 2023-08-01 certified MTS 3 - Software (Automation Developer), MD $141,294
A-22333-64578 2023-07-25 withdrawn Software Engineer, MD $77,189
A-22256-20701 2023-07-25 certified Software Engineer, MD $77,189
A-22221-03060 2023-07-25 certified SMTS - Software (Automation & Network Management), MD $141,294
A-22238-12610 2023-07-13 certified MTS 3 - Hardware, MD $153,462
The other 17
A-22216-00588 2023-05-16 certified Salesforce Developer - Production Support SMTS, MD $141,294
A-22186-83377 2023-05-10 certified Program Manager - Engineering, MD $139,048
A-22158-67326 2023-04-06 denied RF Engineer, MD $102,001
A-22152-64096 2023-04-03 certified SAP ABAP Developer, MD $102,665
A-22153-65289 2023-03-21 certified Production Support Engineer (Service Delivery Group), MD $123,780
A-22152-63987 2023-03-06 certified Communication Systems Software Developer, MD $93,209
A-22090-34066 2023-01-11 certified Satellite Systems Software Engineer, MD $109,162
A-22088-32424 2023-01-10 certified Principal Product Manager, MD $140,918
A-22055-15960 2022-12-07 certified Senior Mechanical Engineer, MD $137,072
A-22060-17721 2022-11-22 certified Senior Informatica Developer, MD $116,168
A-22053-14743 2022-11-15 certified Financial Analyst (International), MD $88,883
A-21349-86684 2022-08-03 certified MTS 3 - Software (Developer - Gateways), MD $97,406
A-21336-80496 2022-08-02 certified Principal DevOps Engineer I, MD $102,440
A-21312-69816 2022-06-06 certified SMTS - Hardware, MD $128,086
A-21312-69441 2022-06-06 certified SMTS - Software, MD $118,102
A-21298-63080 2022-06-01 certified MTS 3 - Software (Developer - Consumer & Enterprise), MD $97,406
A-21280-55441 2022-05-27 certified Salesforce Developer, MD $127,312

Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023

From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.

Country of citizenship

  • India 185
  • China 11
  • Brazil 3
  • Ecuador 3
  • Honduras 2
  • Malaysia 2

Worker's education

  • Master's 183
  • Bachelor's 32
  • Doctorate 2
  • None 1

Visa held when filed

  • H-1B 210
  • L-1 3
  • F-1 1
  • G-4 1
  • H-4 1
  • TN 1

Schools

  • GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY 34
  • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND 31
  • VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY 13
  • NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY 8
  • STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO 8
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON 8

Fields of study

  • TELECOMMUNICATIONS 46
  • ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 43
  • COMPUTER SCIENCE 33
  • COMPUTER ENGINEERING 24
  • ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING 11
  • INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 6

Notes on these numbers

What this rank counts, and what it doesn't

DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The 4 entries below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #276 counts this page's cases only.

10 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.

What these numbers don't say

5 notes
The wage is the job, not the payer
Their filings are led by Software Developers, 38 of 136. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
Volume doesn’t change the wait
DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 136 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
The name is a legal entity
DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 276. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
A median over 132 decided cases
The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
Two sources, and they do not add up
The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is MD. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.

The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built

Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load

Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 22, 2026 · daily

What each source includes

Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.

Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.

Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.

Cite this page