All sponsors · #603 of 71,512 by volume
Hitachi Vantara LLC
64 PERM filings in DOL's current disclosure window, 61 certified and 0 denied. Name as DOL prints it, which is the legal entity on the form.
This rate is level with the field
Computed over 61 decided filings. The 95% interval runs up to a 5.9% denial rate, which still covers the 3.20% the field as a whole records, so this record can't be told apart from the field in either direction.
Filings
64
#603 of 71,512
Certified
61
0 denied
Approval
100.0%
field 96.8%
Median wage
—
not on file
Median days
392
73 faster than the field
Waiting on a decision
3
of 34 tracked cases. The other 31 have been decided.
The oldest one still waiting was filed December 19, 2024, 20 months ago.
Where those 3 are standing
- ANALYST REVIEW
- 267%
- RECONSIDERATION APPEALS
- 133%
A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.
The employer has asked the same officer who denied the case to look at it again, within 30 days of the denial. The request can only use documents DOL already had, so new evidence can't be added to fix what the denial was based on.
A queue position is national and first in, first out, so none of this changes what any one case waits. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.
Latest filings, live from DOL
Newer than DOL's published files, so the wage and law firm aren't known yet. Each case links to its live status.
- G-100-25324-426468 Business Analysts filed 2025-11-20 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-25323-421512 Business Analysts filed 2025-11-19 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-25266-328671 Network Specialists filed 2025-09-23 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25245-281773 Software Engineers filed 2025-09-02 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-24354-558584 Technical Specialist Professional (Software Team) filed 2024-12-19 · RECONSIDERATION APPEALS
Approval rate
100.0%ahead of 33%, level with 895 more
Median days to decision
392 daysahead of 92%
What they file, and where
A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor actually turns on.
What the jobs are
SOC 15-1252.00 · 22 filings, 34% of everything they file
- Computer Systems Analysts 15-1211.0021
- Project Management Specialists 13-1082.005
- Computer and Information Systems Managers 11-30213
- Computer and Information Systems Managers 11-3021.002
- Computer Network Architects 15-1241.002
These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 55 of 64 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.
Where the jobs are
- Texas 57
- California 4
- Florida 1
- Massachusetts 1
- New York 1
The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 5 states cover 64 of 64 filings.
Who files for them
- Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP 59 filings · 100.0% approved
- Berry Appleman Leiden LLP 5 filings
The law firm named on the application. 64 of 64 filings, 100% of the total.
Against the sponsors ranked nearest
The 120 sponsors ranked nearest this one filed between 58 and 69 filings. Their median wait is 468 days, and this one sits 76 days ahead of that. No approval rate is given for the band. A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.
Where this sits in the ranking
Ranked 603 of 71,512 by volume: 602 filed at least as many filings, and 70,909 filed no more.
- Just above
- Stanley Black & Decker Inc. 64 filings
- Just below
- BANK OF AMERICA 64 filings
Sponsors filing at the same rate
The sponsors ranked either side of this one, which is the same as saying they file about as many PERM cases a year. Worksite state isn't carried per employer in this data, so these are volume peers rather than neighbours; filings by state are on the state map.
- #602 Stanley Black & Decker Inc. 64 filings · 1 denied
- #604 BANK OF AMERICA 64 filings · none denied
- #601 VERIHA TRUCKING INC. 64 filings · 14 denied
- #605 Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. 63 filings · none denied
- #600 American Express Company 64 filings · none denied
- #606 Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company 63 filings · 2 denied
What this rank counts, and what it doesn't
DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The 12 entries below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #603 counts this page's cases only.
- Hitachi Digital Services LLC 78 filings
- Hitachi Astemo Americas, Inc. 26 filings
- Hitachi Rail STS USA, Inc. 19 filings
- Hitachi Solutions America, Ltd. 15 filings
- HITACHI ENERGY USA INC. 15 filings
- HITACHI HIGH-TECH AMERICA, INC. 5 filings
- Hitachi Astemo Indiana, Inc. 3 filings
- Hitachi America, Ltd. 3 filings
- Hitachi Global Air Power US, LLC (f/k/a Sullair LLC) 2 filings
- Hitachi Global Air Power US, LLC 2 filings
- HITACHI HIGHTECH AMERICA, INC. 1 filing
- HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY AMERICAS INC. 1 filing
170 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.
What these numbers don't say
- The wage is the job, not the payer
- The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
- Volume doesn’t change the wait
- DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so a company with four thousand filings waits exactly as long as one with three.
- The name is a legal entity
- DOL prints whatever went on the form. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
- A median over 61 decided cases
- The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
- Two sources, and they do not add up
- The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
The window these figures cover
DOL's FY2026 Q3 and FY2025 Q4 and New Form FY2024 Q4 and FY2024 Q4 PERM disclosure files, unioned and de-duplicated by case number: 373,939 cases. Every case in them carries a decision, so nothing here counts what’s still pending. How each figure is built, and what it can and can't answer, is set out in the methodology.
Your case is with them?
The decision estimator reads your filing month against where DOL is now.
Comparing sponsors?
The full ranking sorts every column, and wages by occupation covers what the roles pay.
Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Employers and firms: Derived from the disclosure corpus · data through Aug 26, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly ingest
Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Sep 1, 2026 · daily