Updated
PERM sponsor, #522 of 70,985 by filings
Equinix, Inc.
Equinix, Inc. sponsors green cards: it filed 3 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on March 31, 2026. Equinix, Inc. has 3 PERM cases waiting with DOL.
- Main job
- Software Developers · 35% of its filings
- Main worksite
- Frisco, TX · 42% of its filings
- Industry
- Other Computer Related Services · NAICS 541519
Waiting on a case with Equinix, Inc.?
- When it'll likely be decided
- An email when DOL moves it
This rate is level with the field
Over 68 decided filings, this rate can't be told apart from the field in either direction.
Why
The 95% interval runs up to a 5.3% denial rate, which still covers the 3.20% the field as a whole records.
Filings
71
#522 of 70,985
Certified
68
0 denied
Approval
100.0%
field 96.8%
Median wage
$135,850
offered, per year
Median days
469
3 slower than the field
Right now
DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.
Waiting on a decision
3
of 70 tracked cases. The other 67 have been decided.
The oldest one still waiting was filed January 26, 2026, 8 months ago.
Where those 3 are standing
- ANALYST REVIEW
- 3100%
A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.
None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.
Follow Equinix, Inc.
An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.
What DOL has done to its cases as a group
Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.
Its newest filings
Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.
- G-100-26090-743569 Senior Manager, IT filed 2026-03-31 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26027-593596 Machine Learning Engineer filed 2026-01-27 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26026-591823 Machine Learning Engineer filed 2026-01-26 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26029-602871 Senior Staff Engineer, Product Software filed 2025-10-15 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25274-350865 Senior Business Systems Analyst filed 2025-10-01 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25273-345996 Senior Business Systems Analyst filed 2025-09-30 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25273-345981 Senior Business Systems Analyst filed 2025-09-30 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25273-345941 Senior Business Systems Analyst filed 2025-09-30 · CERTIFIED
The 8 newest. Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
How long it takes
How long their cases are taking
- 302 days
Every employer
median of 28,615 decisions in the same 90 days
Only 2 of their cases were decided in the last 90 days, too few for a median of their own. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.
Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 80,983 cases, and would be decided around March 15, 2027 (between February 23, 2027 and April 24, 2027). Estimate another date
Every program
Across DOL's programs
The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.
- PERM (green card)
- 71 published
- 3 pending
- $135,850 median, n=71
- Prevailing wage requests
- 70 published
- 6 pending
- $149,785 median, n=69
- H-1B labor condition applications
- 900 published
- 4 pending
- $134,971 median, n=899
Its median H-1B wage ($134,971 across 899 LCAs) and its median PERM wage ($135,850 across 71 cases) are within 2% of each other.
Every case across these programs is in the search.
How these are counted
Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.
Its newest wage requests and LCAs
Filed by Equinix, Inc., newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.
Wage requests
- P-100-26267-259672 Senior Associate Engineer, Product Software 2026-09-24 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26256-231650 Director, Product Management 2026-09-13 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26236-187606 Staff Engineer, Product Software 2026-08-24 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26236-187600 Senior Staff Engineer, Product Software 2026-08-24 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26236-187592 Principal Software Architect 2026-08-24 · IN PROCESS
H-1B LCAs
- I-200-26289-305787 Senior Staff Engineer, Product Software 2026-10-16 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26289-305779 Staff Engineer, Product Software 2026-10-16 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26282-292415 Software Development Engineer Principal 2026-10-09 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26282-291290 Principal Engineer, Product Software 2026-10-09 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26281-288777 Software Development Engineer Expert 2026-10-08 · CERTIFIED
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
What its H-1B LCAs were for
From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 900 LCAs filed by Equinix, Inc., 881 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.
New hires and transfers
156 positions for new employment, 251 moving here from another employer.
- New employment 7a 156 · 18%
- Change of employer 7e 251 · 28%
- Continuing 7b 358 · 41%
- Change in previous employment 7c 29 · 3%
- Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
- Amended petition 7f 87 · 10%
Shares of the 881 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.
What each box on the form means
- New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
- Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
- Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
- Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
- Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
- Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.
Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.
Wage level it chose
- Level I 16 · 2%
- Level II 349 · 44%
- Level III 286 · 36%
- Level IV 151 · 19%
Shares of the 802 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 79 of 881 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.
What it declared on Section H
- H-1B-dependent
- No
- Found a willful violator
- No
As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 22, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 816 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 889. Both are the employer's own answers.
What the two answers mean
H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.
Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.
Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR
Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 888 · E-3 (Australia) 9 · H-1B1 (Singapore) 3. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.
Against other sponsors
Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.
How it compares with other sponsors
Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.
PERM approval rate
100.0% of 68 decided PERM cases
Higher than 67% of the 1,343 sponsors with 30 or more decided cases.
PERM filings in the last 12 months
3 filed in the last 12 months
Higher than 68% of the 13,942 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.
H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months
187 certified in the last 24 months
Higher than 98% of the 27,916 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.
Share of H-1B positions that were transfers
12% of 239 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 42% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.
Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV
55% of 215 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 70% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.
USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years
98.7% of 302 USCIS decisions
Higher than 51% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.
Approval rate
100.0%ahead of 34%, level with 891 more
Median days to decision
469 daysahead of 45%
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Against the sponsors ranked nearest
The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 65 and 80 filings.
- Their median wait
- 458 days
- This one
- 469 days
This one sits 11 days behind them.
Why no approval rate
A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.
Where this sits in the ranking
Ranked 522 of 70,985 by volume: 521 filed at least as many filings, and 70,463 filed no more.
- Just above
- Garmin International Inc. 71 filings
- Just below
- Target Enterprise, Inc. 71 filings
Sponsors filing at the same rate
Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.
Sponsors hiring for the same work
The employers filing the most PERM cases for Software Developers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.
What they file, and where
A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.
What the jobs are
SOC 15-1252.00 · 25 filings, 35% of everything they file
- Computer Systems Analysts 15-1211.0021
- Project Management Specialists 13-1082.004
- Computer Network Architects 15-1241.003
- Information Security Analysts 15-1212.003
- Software Developers, Systems Software 15-11333
How this is counted
These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 59 of 71 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.
The industry they declared
Other Computer Related Services
NAICS 541519 · 69 filings
- Computer Systems Design and Related Services 541512
How this is counted
The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.
Where the jobs are
- California 34
- Texas 31
- Georgia 2
- Virginia 2
- Florida 1
- Washington 1
How this is counted
The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 6 states cover 71 of 71 filings.
Where the work is
- Frisco, TX 30
- Sunnyvale, CA 20
- Redwood City, CA 13
- Ashburn, VA 2
- Norcross, GA 2
- Dallas, TX 1
How this is counted
The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 6 cities cover 68 of 71 filings.
Who files for them
- BERRY APPLEMAN & LEIDEN LLP 71 filings · 100.0% approved
How this is counted
The law firm named on the application. 71 of 71 filings, 100% of the total.
Newspapers it advertised in
- 14 cases
The Mercury News
- 13 cases
Frisco Enterprise
- 10 cases
San Jose Mercury News
- 2 cases
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
- 2 cases
The Dallas Morning News
- 2 cases
The Washington Post
How this is counted
The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.
Additional steps it used
- 45 cases
Job search websites
- 45 cases
Local or ethnic newspapers
- 45 cases
Trade or professional organizations
How this is counted
The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.
How long before filing it began
- 0.0%
Under 30 days
- 0.0%
30 to 59 days
- 0.0%
60 to 89 days
- 18%
90 to 119 days
- 4.4%
120 to 149 days
- 78%
150 to 180 days
- 0.0%
Over 180 days
How this is counted
Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.
History
Year by year since 2008
287 PERM decisions from FY2008 to FY2026, busiest in FY2021 with 47.
- certified
- denied
- withdrawn
Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.
Every year as a table
| Fiscal year | Certified | Denied | Withdrawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2008 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2009 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2010 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2011 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2012 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
| FY2013 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
| FY2014 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2015 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
| FY2016 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2017 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2018 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2019 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2020 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2021 | 47 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2022 | 30 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2023 | 35 | 2 | 1 |
| FY2024 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2025 | 27 | 0 | 3 |
| FY2026 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
Decided in FY2016 to FY2023
The 25 most recent of 179. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.
| Case | Decided | Outcome | Job | Offered wage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-22228-06517 | 2023-09-25 | certified | Staff Engineer, Product Software, CA | $184,080 |
| A-22255-19960 | 2023-09-07 | certified | Revenue Operations Analyst, NY | $75,000 |
| A-22222-03767 | 2023-08-04 | certified | Senior Associate Engineer, Product Software, CA | $130,894 |
| A-22223-04387 | 2023-08-03 | certified | Staff Application and Database Administrator, TX | $96,600 |
| A-22227-06131 | 2023-07-10 | certified | Staff Application and Database Administrator, TX | $96,000 |
| A-22111-44133 | 2023-07-06 | certified | Senior Staff Engineer, Product Software, CA | $168,834 |
| A-22110-43324 | 2023-07-06 | certified | Business Systems Analyst, TX | $120,952 |
| A-22110-43418 | 2023-04-20 | certified | Business Systems Analyst, TX | $120,952 |
The other 17
| A-21305-66146 | 2023-04-19 | certified | Project and Program Manager, CA | $168,834 |
| A-22080-28243 | 2023-04-19 | certified | Staff Engineer, Product Software, CA | $184,080 |
| A-22080-28217 | 2023-04-19 | certified | Staff Engineer, Product Software, CA | $130,894 |
| A-22080-28202 | 2023-04-19 | certified | Staff Engineer, Product Software, CA | $184,080 |
| A-22104-40969 | 2023-04-11 | certified | Senior Staff Engineer, Product Software, CA | $168,834 |
| A-22089-33064 | 2023-04-11 | certified | Senior Staff Engineer, Product Software, CA | $168,834 |
| A-22096-36331 | 2023-04-11 | certified | Senior Business Systems Analyst, TX | $128,315 |
| A-22131-53895 | 2023-04-10 | certified | Senior Staff Network Architect, CA | $189,384 |
| A-22131-53896 | 2023-04-10 | certified | Staff Software Engineer, CA | $189,384 |
| A-22033-06328 | 2023-03-22 | certified | Senior Business Systems Analyst, TX | $128,315 |
| A-22108-42074 | 2023-03-20 | certified | Project and Program Manager, CA | $168,834 |
| A-22105-41581 | 2023-03-20 | certified | Senior Business Analyst, Sales, CA | $120,000 |
| A-22105-41626 | 2023-03-20 | certified | Senior Staff Network Architect, CA | $189,384 |
| A-22125-50809 | 2023-03-16 | certified | Staff Engineer, Product Software, CA | $130,894 |
| A-23038-98616 | 2023-03-10 | withdrawn | Senior Software Engineer, TX | $134,992 |
| A-22087-31594 | 2023-02-23 | denied | Staff Engineer, Product Software, CA | $130,894 |
| A-22080-28180 | 2023-02-23 | denied | Principal Engineer, Product Software, CA | $184,080 |
Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023
From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.
Country of citizenship
- India 153
- China 9
- Pakistan 3
- Canada 2
- Nepal 2
- United Kingdom 2
Worker's education
- Master's 99
- Bachelor's 76
- None 3
- Other 1
Visa held when filed
- H-1B 171
- F-1 3
- L-1 2
- PAROLEE 2
- H-4 1
Schools
- JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 15
- SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY 11
- BHARATHIAR UNIVERSITY 6
- UNIVERSITY OF PUNE 5
- ANNA UNIVERSITY 4
- INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 4
Fields of study
- COMPUTER SCIENCE 30
- SOFTWARE ENGINEERING 15
- COMPUTER ENGINEERING 13
- BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 12
- ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 12
- ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING 12
Notes on these numbers
What these numbers don't say
5 notes
- The wage is the job, not the payer
- Their filings are led by Software Developers, 25 of 71. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
- Volume doesn’t change the wait
- DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 71 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
- The name is a legal entity
- DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 522. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
- A median over 68 decided cases
- The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
- Two sources, and they do not add up
- The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is CA. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built
Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load
Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 18, 2026 · daily
What each source includes
Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.
Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.
Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.