Updated
PERM sponsor, #474 of 70,985 by filings
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI)
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI) sponsors green cards: it filed 6 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on December 8, 2025.
- Main job
- Software Developers · 36% of its filings
- Main worksite
- Redlands, CA · 86% of its filings
- Industry
- Software Publishers · NAICS 511210
Waiting on a case with Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI)?
- When it'll likely be decided
- An email when DOL moves it
This rate is level with the field
Over 76 decided filings, this rate can't be told apart from the field in either direction.
Why
The 95% interval runs up to a 14.5% denial rate, which still covers the 3.20% the field as a whole records.
Filings
78
#474 of 70,985
Certified
71
5 denied
Approval
93.4%
field 96.8%
Median wage
$87,000
offered, per year
Median days
486
20 slower than the field
Right now
DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.
Nothing for this sponsor is waiting on a decision. All 95 of their cases in the live tracker are closed.
Follow Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI)
An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.
What DOL has done to its cases as a group
Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.
Its newest filings
Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.
- G-100-25342-464749 Systems Engineer filed 2025-12-08 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25342-464520 Solution Engineer filed 2025-12-08 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25315-396687 Product Engineer filed 2025-11-11 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25314-394108 Business Strategy Analyst filed 2025-11-10 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25311-389051 Application Developer filed 2025-11-07 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25307-359416 Technical Consultant filed 2025-11-03 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25273-346090 Business Analyst filed 2025-09-30 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25233-257874 Business Analytics Strategist filed 2025-08-21 · CERTIFIED
The 8 newest. Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
How long it takes
How long their cases are taking
- 304 days
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI)
median of 6 decisions in the last 90 days
- 301 days
Every employer
median of 32,341 decisions in the same 90 days
About the same as everyone: DOL works one national line in filing order. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.
Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 79,683 cases, and would be decided around March 21, 2027 (between March 1, 2027 and April 30, 2027). Estimate another date
Every program
Across DOL's programs
The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.
- PERM (green card)
- 78 published
- 0 pending
- $87,000 median, n=78
- Prevailing wage requests
- 68 published
- 0 pending
- $86,986 median, n=67
- H-1B labor condition applications
- 254 published
- 0 pending
- $100,000 median, n=253
Its median H-1B wage is $100,000 across 253 LCAs, 15% higher than its median PERM wage of $87,000 across 78 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.
Every case across these programs is in the search.
How these are counted
Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name, read under the 2 spellings DOL's files use for it; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.
Its newest wage requests and LCAs
Filed by Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI), newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.
Wage requests
- P-100-25092-823690 Technical Consultant $129,480 per year 2025-04-02 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
- P-100-25083-799328 Technical Analyst $119,392 per year 2025-03-24 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
- P-100-25027-643733 Solution Engineer $43,846 per year 2025-01-27 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
- P-100-25006-595915 Business Strategy Analyst $88,608 per year 2025-01-06 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
- P-100-25006-595773 Application Developer $88,899 per year 2025-01-06 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
H-1B LCAs
- I-200-25190-163024 Software Development Engineer $141,000 per year 2025-07-09 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-25125-939274 Software Development Engineer $134,181 per year 2025-05-05 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-25093-828086 Software Development Engineer $115,000 per year 2025-04-03 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-25092-824904 Principal Application Developer $158,000 per year 2025-04-02 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-25087-811518 Technical Account Specialist $78,000 per year 2025-03-28 · CERTIFIED
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
What its H-1B LCAs were for
From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 254 LCAs filed by Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI), 247 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.
New hires and transfers
81 positions for new employment, 17 moving here from another employer.
- New employment 7a 81 · 33%
- Change of employer 7e 17 · 7%
- Continuing 7b 91 · 37%
- Change in previous employment 7c 34 · 14%
- Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
- Amended petition 7f 24 · 10%
Shares of the 247 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.
What each box on the form means
- New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
- Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
- Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
- Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
- Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
- Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.
Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.
Wage level it chose
- Level I 24 · 10%
- Level II 118 · 48%
- Level III 76 · 31%
- Level IV 29 · 12%
Shares of the 247 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 0 of 247 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.
What it declared on Section H
- H-1B-dependent
- No
- Found a willful violator
- No
As answered on its newest LCA, filed July 9, 2025. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 231 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 251. Both are the employer's own answers.
What the two answers mean
H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.
Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.
Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR
Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 251 · E-3 (Australia) 3. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.
Against other sponsors
Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.
How it compares with other sponsors
Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.
PERM approval rate
93.4% of 76 decided PERM cases
Higher than 7% of the 1,343 sponsors with 30 or more decided cases.
PERM filings in the last 12 months
6 filed in the last 12 months
Higher than 83% of the 14,057 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.
H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months
59 certified in the last 24 months
Higher than 94% of the 27,849 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.
Share of H-1B positions that were transfers
5.0% of 80 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 20% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.
Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV
51% of 80 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 67% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.
Approval rate
93.4%ahead of 7%
Median days to decision
486 daysahead of 19%
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Against the sponsors ranked nearest
The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 70 and 89 filings.
- Their median wait
- 458 days
- This one
- 486 days
This one sits 28 days behind them.
Why no approval rate
A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.
Where this sits in the ranking
Ranked 474 of 70,985 by volume: 473 filed at least as many filings, and 70,511 filed no more.
- Just above
- Black & Veatch Corporation 78 filings
- Just below
- Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. 78 filings
Sponsors filing at the same rate
Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.
- #473 Black & Veatch Corporation 78 filings · none denied
- #475 Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. 78 filings · none denied
- #472 P & P Restaurants, Inc. 78 filings · none denied
- #476 MONGODB, INC. 78 filings · 1 denied
- #471 POLMAX LLC dba Experior Transport 79 filings · none denied
- #477 Zensar Technologies Inc. 78 filings · none denied
Sponsors hiring for the same work
The employers filing the most PERM cases for Software Developers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.
What they file, and where
A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.
What the jobs are
SOC 15-1252.00 · 28 filings, 36% of everything they file
- Geographic Information Systems Technologists and Technicians 15-1299.0212
- Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers 15-1253.008
- Web and Digital Interface Designers 15-1255.006
- Business Intelligence Analysts 15-2051.013
- Sales Engineers 41-9031.003
How this is counted
These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 60 of 78 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.
The industry they declared
Software Publishers
NAICS 511210 · 78 filings
How this is counted
The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.
Where the jobs are
- California 69
- Florida 3
- Virginia 3
- Massachusetts 2
- Washington 1
How this is counted
The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 5 states cover 78 of 78 filings.
Where the work is
- Redlands, CA 67
- Coral Gables, FL 3
- Vienna, VA 3
- Berkeley, CA 2
- Middleton, MA 2
- Olympia, WA 1
How this is counted
The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 6 cities cover 78 of 78 filings.
Who files for them
- Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 78 filings · 93.4% approved
How this is counted
The law firm named on the application. 78 of 78 filings, 100% of the total.
Newspapers it advertised in
- 66 cases
Southern California News Group
- 3 cases
Miami Herald
- 3 cases
The Washington Post
- 2 cases
The Boston Globe
- 2 cases
San Francisco Chronicle
- 1 cases
Los Angeles Times
How this is counted
The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.
Additional steps it used
- 78 cases
The employer's website
- 78 cases
Job search websites
- 77 cases
Local or ethnic newspapers
- 2 cases
Radio or TV ads
How this is counted
The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.
How long before filing it began
- 0.0%
Under 30 days
- 0.0%
30 to 59 days
- 26%
60 to 89 days
- 42%
90 to 119 days
- 19%
120 to 149 days
- 13%
150 to 180 days
- 0.0%
Over 180 days
How this is counted
Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.
History
Year by year since 2024
78 PERM decisions from FY2024 to FY2026, busiest in FY2026 with 42.
- certified
- denied
- withdrawn
Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.
Every year as a table
| Fiscal year | Certified | Denied | Withdrawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2025 | 22 | 0 | 2 |
| FY2026 | 37 | 5 | 0 |
Notes on these numbers
What this rank counts, and what it doesn't
DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The 16 entries below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #474 counts this page's cases only.
- ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 14 filings
- Environmental Design, Inc. 5 filings
- Environmental Resources Management, Inc. 5 filings
- Environmental Science U.S. LLC 3 filings
- Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. 3 filings
- Environmental Furniture Company Inc 2 filings
- Environmental Partners Group, LLC 2 filings
- Environmental Planning Development Solutions Inc. 2 filings
- Environmental Construction Inc. 1 filing
- Environmental Construction Services Inc. 1 filing
- Environmental Design Group, LLC 1 filing
- THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINANCIAL CONSULTING GROUP LLC 1 filing
- Environmental Spray Systems, Inc 1 filing
- Environmental Systems Corporation 1 filing
- ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS DESIGN, INC 1 filing
- Environmental Working Group 1 filing
44 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.
What these numbers don't say
5 notes
- The wage is the job, not the payer
- Their filings are led by Software Developers, 28 of 78. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
- Volume doesn’t change the wait
- DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 78 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
- The name is a legal entity
- DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 474. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
- A median over 76 decided cases
- The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
- Two sources, and they do not add up
- The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is CA. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built
Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load
Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 24, 2026 · daily
What each source includes
Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.
Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.
Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.