Updated
PERM sponsor, #841 of 70,985 by filings
Dexcom, Inc.
Dexcom, Inc. sponsors green cards: it filed 16 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on September 16, 2026. Dexcom, Inc. has 9 PERM cases waiting with DOL.
- Main job
- Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers · 23% of its filings
- Main worksite
- San Diego, CA · 91% of its filings
- Industry
- Electromedical and Electrotherapeutic Apparatus Manufacturing · NAICS 334510
Waiting on a case with Dexcom, Inc.?
- When it'll likely be decided
- An email when DOL moves it
This rate is level with the field
Over 46 decided filings, this rate can't be told apart from the field in either direction.
Why
The 95% interval runs up to a 7.7% denial rate, which still covers the 3.20% the field as a whole records.
Filings
47
#841 of 70,985
Certified
46
0 denied
Approval
100.0%
field 96.8%
Median wage
$125,840
offered, per year
Median days
435
31 faster than the field
Right now
DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.
Waiting on a decision
9
of 57 tracked cases. The other 48 have been decided.
The oldest one still waiting was filed January 5, 2026, 9 months ago.
Where those 9 are standing
- ANALYST REVIEW
- 9100%
A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.
None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.
Follow Dexcom, Inc.
An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.
What DOL has done to its cases as a group
Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.
Its newest filings
Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.
- G-100-26259-237206 Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist filed 2026-09-16 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26251-221190 Digital Analytics, Marketing Manager filed 2026-09-08 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26237-192286 Sr. SW Test Development Engineer filed 2026-08-25 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26132-898200 Staff QA Engineer filed 2026-05-12 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26121-858476 SW Development Engineer 2 filed 2026-05-01 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26119-846742 SW Test Development Engineer 2 filed 2026-04-29 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26029-602630 Sr. SW Systems Engineer filed 2026-01-29 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26029-601269 Sr. Staff Product Owner filed 2026-01-29 · ANALYST REVIEW
The 8 newest. Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
How long it takes
How long their cases are taking
- 301 days
Dexcom, Inc.
median of 6 decisions in the last 90 days
- 302 days
Every employer
median of 28,615 decisions in the same 90 days
About the same as everyone: DOL works one national line in filing order. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.
Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 81,062 cases, and would be decided around March 16, 2027 (between February 24, 2027 and April 25, 2027). Estimate another date
Every program
Across DOL's programs
The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.
- PERM (green card)
- 47 published
- 9 pending
- $125,840 median, n=47
- Prevailing wage requests
- 60 published
- 4 pending
- $135,138 median, n=59
- H-1B labor condition applications
- 360 published
- 2 pending
- $119,392 median, n=359
Its median H-1B wage is $119,392 across 359 LCAs, 5.1% lower than its median PERM wage of $125,840 across 47 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.
Every case across these programs is in the search.
How these are counted
Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.
Its newest wage requests and LCAs
Filed by Dexcom, Inc., newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.
Wage requests
- P-100-26289-306970 SW Test Development Engineer 2 2026-10-16 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26267-257072 Sr Business Systems Analyst 2026-09-24 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26216-143899 SW Test Development Engineer 2 2026-08-04 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26183-073797 Sr QA Engineer 2026-07-02 · RFI ISSUED
- P-100-26176-050120 Senior Staff Enterprise Applications Developer 2026-06-25 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
H-1B LCAs
- I-200-26286-297121 Staff SW Test Development Engineer 2026-10-13 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26286-297061 Sr. Product Owner 2026-10-13 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26257-232515 Staff Systems Administrator 2026-09-14 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-26252-223924 Sr Staff Systems Design Engineer 2026-09-09 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-26233-186933 SW Development Engineer 2 2026-08-21 · CERTIFIED
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
What its H-1B LCAs were for
From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 360 LCAs filed by Dexcom, Inc., 338 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.
New hires and transfers
69 positions for new employment, 87 moving here from another employer.
- New employment 7a 69 · 20%
- Change of employer 7e 87 · 25%
- Continuing 7b 48 · 14%
- Change in previous employment 7c 107 · 31%
- Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
- Amended petition 7f 33 · 10%
Shares of the 344 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.
What each box on the form means
- New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
- Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
- Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
- Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
- Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
- Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.
Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.
Wage level it chose
- Level I 1 · 1%
- Level II 73 · 22%
- Level III 155 · 47%
- Level IV 102 · 31%
Shares of the 331 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 7 of 338 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.
What it declared on Section H
- H-1B-dependent
- No
- Found a willful violator
- No
As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 15, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 327 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 360. Both are the employer's own answers.
What the two answers mean
H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.
Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.
Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR
Against other sponsors
Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.
How it compares with other sponsors
Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.
PERM approval rate
100.0% of 46 decided PERM cases
Higher than 67% of the 1,343 sponsors with 30 or more decided cases.
PERM filings in the last 12 months
16 filed in the last 12 months
Higher than 94% of the 13,946 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.
H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months
86 certified in the last 24 months
Higher than 96% of the 27,903 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.
Share of H-1B positions that were transfers
5.1% of 97 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 20% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.
Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV
80% of 97 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 92% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.
USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years
98.2% of 112 USCIS decisions
Higher than 45% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.
Approval rate
100.0%ahead of 34%, level with 891 more
Median days to decision
435 daysahead of 75%
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Against the sponsors ranked nearest
The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 44 and 51 filings.
- Their median wait
- 466 days
- This one
- 435 days
This one sits 31 days ahead of them.
Why no approval rate
A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.
Where this sits in the ranking
Ranked 841 of 70,985 by volume: 840 filed at least as many filings, and 70,144 filed no more.
- Just above
- Valdes Enterprises, LLC 47 filings
- Just below
- EVEREST CONSULTING GROUP, INC 47 filings
Sponsors filing at the same rate
Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.
- #840 Valdes Enterprises, LLC 47 filings · none denied
- #842 EVEREST CONSULTING GROUP, INC 47 filings · 1 denied
- #839 Turner & Townsend, Inc. 47 filings · none denied
- #843 Hanwha Q Cells USA, Inc. 47 filings · none denied
- #838 Tencent America LLC 47 filings · none denied
- #844 Fusion Life Sciences Technologies, LLC 47 filings · none denied
Sponsors hiring for the same work
The employers filing the most PERM cases for Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.
- #4 APPLE INC. 2,813 filings · 6 denied
- #9 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED 2,319 filings · none denied
- #49 ServiceNow, Inc. 638 filings · 3 denied
- #18 Deloitte Consulting LLP 1,527 filings · 1 denied
- #11 Amazon.com Services LLC 2,271 filings · 8 denied
- #125 The MathWorks, Inc. 286 filings · 1 denied
What they file, and where
A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.
What the jobs are
Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers
SOC 15-1253.00 · 11 filings, 23% of everything they file
- Software Developers 15-1252.0010
- Manufacturing Engineers 17-2112.035
- Computer Systems Analysts 15-1211.002
- Data Scientists 15-2051.002
- Electronics Engineers, Except Computer 17-2072.002
How this is counted
These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 32 of 47 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.
The industry they declared
Electromedical and Electrotherapeutic Apparatus Manufacturing
NAICS 334510 · 47 filings
How this is counted
The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.
Where the jobs are
- California 43
- Arizona 3
- Oregon 1
How this is counted
The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 3 states cover 47 of 47 filings.
Where the work is
- San Diego, CA 43
- Mesa, AZ 3
- Portland, OR 1
How this is counted
The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 3 cities cover 47 of 47 filings.
Who files for them
- Larrabee Albi Coker LLP 28 filings
- Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 19 filings
How this is counted
The law firm named on the application. 47 of 47 filings, 100% of the total.
Newspapers it advertised in
- 28 cases
The San Diego Union-Tribune
- 2 cases
The Arizona Republic
- 1 cases
AZ Republic
- 1 cases
The Oregonian
How this is counted
The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.
Additional steps it used
- 32 cases
Local or ethnic newspapers
- 31 cases
Job search websites
- 30 cases
Campus placement offices
- 2 cases
On-campus recruiting
- 1 cases
The employer's website
How this is counted
The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.
How long before filing it began
- 0.0%
Under 30 days
- 0.0%
30 to 59 days
- 50%
60 to 89 days
- 31%
90 to 119 days
- 9.4%
120 to 149 days
- 9.4%
150 to 180 days
- 0.0%
Over 180 days
How this is counted
Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.
History
Year by year since 2008
114 PERM decisions from FY2008 to FY2026, busiest in FY2025 with 22.
- certified
- denied
- withdrawn
Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.
Every year as a table
| Fiscal year | Certified | Denied | Withdrawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2008 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2009 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2010 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2011 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2012 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2013 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2014 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2015 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2016 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2017 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2018 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2019 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2020 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2021 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2022 | 14 | 1 | 1 |
| FY2023 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2024 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2025 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2026 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Decided in FY2016 to FY2023
The 25 most recent of 63. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.
| Case | Decided | Outcome | Job | Offered wage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-22277-33434 | 2023-09-26 | certified | Sr. Software Development Engineer, CA | $155,397 |
| A-22112-45128 | 2023-09-06 | certified | Staff Automation Engineer, CA | $138,611 |
| A-22252-19230 | 2023-08-24 | certified | Sr. Product Owner, CA | $118,248 |
| A-22252-19064 | 2023-08-24 | certified | Manager, Regulatory Affairs, CA | $176,550 |
| A-22243-15216 | 2023-07-27 | certified | Sr. Software Development Engineer, CA | $122,847 |
| A-22243-15172 | 2023-07-17 | certified | Software Test Development Engineer 2, CA | $107,830 |
| A-22088-32588 | 2023-06-08 | certified | Staff Quality Assurance Engineer, CA | $111,654 |
| A-22259-23150 | 2023-04-19 | withdrawn | Senior Technical Project Manager, CA | $118,248 |
The other 17
| A-22116-46523 | 2023-02-24 | certified | Senior Software Test Engineer, CA | $118,248 |
| A-22122-48869 | 2023-01-25 | certified | Sr. Automation Engineer, CA | $138,611 |
| A-22098-38438 | 2023-01-18 | certified | Sr. Software Development Engineer, CA | $139,360 |
| A-22083-30558 | 2023-01-18 | certified | Sr. Business Systems Analyst, CA | $113,006 |
| A-22067-20921 | 2022-12-21 | certified | Sr. Software Development Engineer, CA | $139,360 |
| A-21341-82901 | 2022-09-27 | certified | Sr. Software Development Engineer, CA | $80,662 |
| A-21341-82639 | 2022-09-21 | certified | Software Test Engineer 2, CA | $61,859 |
| A-22186-83304 | 2022-09-06 | withdrawn | Sr. Associate Biostatistician, CA | $90,000 |
| A-21271-51249 | 2022-08-02 | certified | Sr. Process Development Engineer, CA | $111,654 |
| A-21292-60542 | 2022-06-24 | denied | Senior Software Development Engineer, CA | $139,360 |
| A-21243-38461 | 2022-04-28 | certified | Senior Software Test Engineer, CA | $107,764 |
| A-21243-38256 | 2022-04-21 | certified | Senior Software Development Engineer, CA | $118,248 |
| A-21260-46565 | 2022-04-12 | certified | Senior Software Applications Engineer, CA | $121,005 |
| A-21239-37109 | 2022-03-22 | certified | Software Development Engineer 2, CA | $80,184 |
| A-21181-10868 | 2022-02-14 | certified | Software Test Engineer 2, CA | $90,410 |
| A-21215-26621 | 2022-02-02 | certified | Sr. Software Development Engineer, CA | $112,902 |
| A-21180-09632 | 2022-01-14 | certified | Senior Process Development Engineer, CA | $112,528 |
Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023
From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.
Country of citizenship
- India 48
- China 7
- Mexico 4
- Canada 1
- Nepal 1
- South Korea 1
Worker's education
- Master's 41
- Bachelor's 20
- Doctorate 1
- Other 1
Visa held when filed
- H-1B 57
- TN 4
- J-2 1
- TPS 1
Schools
- SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY 5
- NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY 3
- OSMANIA UNIVERSITY 3
- ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY 2
- COLEMAN UNIVERSITY 2
- JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2
Fields of study
- COMPUTER SCIENCE 11
- SEE H.14 9
- ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 7
- COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING 2
- ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT 2
- INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT 2
Notes on these numbers
What these numbers don't say
5 notes
- The wage is the job, not the payer
- Their filings are led by Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers, 11 of 47. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
- Volume doesn’t change the wait
- DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 47 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
- The name is a legal entity
- DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 841. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
- A median over 46 decided cases
- The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
- Two sources, and they do not add up
- The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is CA. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built
Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load
Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 19, 2026 · daily
What each source includes
Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.
Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.
Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.