Updated
PERM sponsor, #4,553 of 70,985 by filings
CHA Consulting, Inc.
CHA Consulting, Inc. sponsors green cards: it filed 6 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on March 24, 2026. CHA Consulting, Inc. has 4 PERM cases waiting with DOL.
- Main job
- Civil Engineers · 30% of its filings
- Main worksite
- Doral, FL · 30% of its filings
- Industry
- Engineering Services · NAICS 541330
Waiting on a case with CHA Consulting, Inc.?
- When it'll likely be decided
- An email when DOL moves it
Too few cases for a rate
7 decided filings: too few for an approval rate.
Why
Across every PERM case DOL decided in this window, 3.20% were denied. At that rate a file this size comes back clean most of the time whatever the sponsor did, so a percentage would be a fact about how few cases there are. Telling a clean record apart from the field takes about 117 decided cases.
Filings
10
#4,553 of 70,985
Certified
7
0 denied
Approval
Not shown
withheld: 7 decided
Median wage
$79,789
offered, per year
Median days
478
middle of 7 decided
Right now
DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.
Waiting on a decision
4
of 13 tracked cases. The other 9 have been decided.
The oldest one still waiting was filed January 8, 2026, 9 months ago.
Where those 4 are standing
- ANALYST REVIEW
- 4100%
A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.
None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.
Follow CHA Consulting, Inc.
An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.
What DOL has done to its cases as a group
Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.
Its newest filings
Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.
- G-100-26083-724688 Architect II filed 2026-03-24 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26068-688724 Engineer II filed 2026-03-09 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26068-688682 Engineer II filed 2026-03-09 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26008-543540 Project Manager I filed 2026-01-08 · ANALYST REVIEW
Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
How long it takes
How long their cases are taking
- 301 days
Every employer
median of 31,092 decisions in the same 90 days
None of their cases were decided in the last 90 days, too few for a median of their own. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.
Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 79,915 cases, and would be decided around March 19, 2027 (between February 27, 2027 and April 28, 2027). Estimate another date
Every program
Across DOL's programs
The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.
- PERM (green card)
- 10 published
- 4 pending
- $79,789 median, n=10
- Prevailing wage requests
- 12 published
- 3 pending
- $68,640 median, n=12
- H-1B labor condition applications
- 110 published
- 0 pending
- $83,000 median, n=110
Its median H-1B wage is $83,000 across 110 LCAs, 4.0% higher than its median PERM wage of $79,789 across 10 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.
Every case across these programs is in the search.
How these are counted
Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.
Its newest wage requests and LCAs
Filed by CHA Consulting, Inc., newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.
Wage requests
- P-100-26294-314269 Project Manager II 2026-10-21 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26279-283512 Project Engineer III 2026-10-06 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26279-283435 Project Manager I - OPM 2026-10-06 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-25129-958979 Engineer II $87,693 per year 2025-05-09 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
- P-100-25129-958807 Architect II $67,205 per year 2025-05-09 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
H-1B LCAs
- I-200-26259-237739 Engineer II 2026-09-16 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-26245-211174 Project Engineer III 2026-09-02 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-26237-192198 Engineer II 2026-08-25 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-26237-191793 Project Engineer IV 2026-08-25 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-26134-909232 Architect III $90,000 per year 2026-05-14 · CERTIFIED
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
What its H-1B LCAs were for
From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 110 LCAs filed by CHA Consulting, Inc., 91 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.
New hires and transfers
36 positions for new employment, 17 moving here from another employer.
- New employment 7a 36 · 40%
- Change of employer 7e 17 · 19%
- Continuing 7b 23 · 25%
- Change in previous employment 7c 1 · 1%
- Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
- Amended petition 7f 14 · 15%
Shares of the 91 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.
What each box on the form means
- New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
- Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
- Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
- Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
- Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
- Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.
Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.
Wage level it chose
- Level I 48 · 53%
- Level II 22 · 24%
- Level III 15 · 16%
- Level IV 6 · 7%
Shares of the 91 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 0 of 91 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.
What it declared on Section H
- H-1B-dependent
- No
- Found a willful violator
- No
As answered on its newest LCA, filed May 14, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 106 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 109. Both are the employer's own answers.
What the two answers mean
H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.
Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.
Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR
Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 108 · E-3 (Australia) 2. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.
Against other sponsors
Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.
How it compares with other sponsors
Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.
PERM filings in the last 12 months
6 filed in the last 12 months
Higher than 83% of the 14,017 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.
H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months
37 certified in the last 24 months
Higher than 90% of the 27,873 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.
Share of H-1B positions that were transfers
7.7% of 39 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 28% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.
Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV
33% of 39 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 51% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.
USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years
96.9% of 32 USCIS decisions
Higher than 29% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.
Approval rate
not shownunder 30 decided
Median days to decision
478 daysmiddle of 7 decided, too few to rank
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Against the sponsors ranked nearest
The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed 10 filings each.
- Their median wait
- 474 days
- This one
- 478 days
This one sits 4 days behind them.
Why no approval rate
A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.
Where this sits in the ranking
Ranked 4,553 of 70,985 by volume: 4,552 filed at least as many filings, and 66,432 filed no more.
- Just above
- Gruma Corporation 10 filings
- Just below
- Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC 10 filings
Sponsors filing at the same rate
Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.
- #4,552 Gruma Corporation 10 filings · 2 denied
- #4,554 Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC 10 filings · none denied
- #4,551 INFO LABS INC. 10 filings · 1 denied
- #4,555 CGI Little Tokyo Inc. 10 filings · none denied
- #4,550 Buckeye Elementary School District #33 10 filings · none denied
- #4,556 Gonzaga University 10 filings · 1 denied
Sponsors hiring for the same work
The employers filing the most PERM cases for Civil Engineers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.
- #195 WSP USA Inc. 195 filings · none denied
- #375 Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. 98 filings · 2 denied
- #1,285 Clayco, Inc. 32 filings · 1 denied
- #1,201 THORNTON TOMASETTI, INC. 34 filings · none denied
- #1,243 Terracon Consultants, Inc. 33 filings · 1 denied
- #353 AECOM Technical Services Inc 103 filings · 1 denied
What they file, and where
A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.
What the jobs are
SOC 17-2051.00 · 3 filings, 30% of everything they file
- Data Scientists 15-2051.002
- Electrical Engineers, Non-R&D 17-20731
- Mechanical Engineers 17-21411
- Transportation Engineers 17-2051.011
- Water/Wastewater Engineers 17-2051.021
How this is counted
These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 9 of 10 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.
The industry they declared
Engineering Services
NAICS 541330 · 10 filings
How this is counted
The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.
Where the jobs are
- Florida 3
- New York 3
- Connecticut 2
- Indiana 1
- New Jersey 1
How this is counted
The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 5 states cover 10 of 10 filings.
Where the work is
- Doral, FL 3
- Albany, NY 2
- Rocky Hill, CT 2
- Brooklyn, NY 1
- Indianapolis, IN 1
- Parsippany, NJ 1
How this is counted
The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 6 cities cover 10 of 10 filings.
Who files for them
- Whiteman Osterman & Hanna 10 filings
How this is counted
The law firm named on the application. 10 of 10 filings, 100% of the total.
Newspapers it advertised in
- 3 cases
Miami Herald
- 2 cases
Hartford Courant
- 2 cases
Times Union
- 1 cases
The New York Times
- 1 cases
THE SUNDAY STAR
How this is counted
The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.
Additional steps it used
- 9 cases
The employer's website
- 9 cases
Job search websites
- 9 cases
Local or ethnic newspapers
How this is counted
The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.
How long before filing it began
- 0.0%
Under 30 days
- 0.0%
30 to 59 days
- 0.0%
60 to 89 days
- 44%
90 to 119 days
- 44%
120 to 149 days
- 11%
150 to 180 days
- 0.0%
Over 180 days
How this is counted
Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.
History
Year by year since 2012
15 PERM decisions from FY2012 to FY2026, busiest in FY2026 with 5.
- certified
- denied
- withdrawn
Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.
Every year as a table
| Fiscal year | Certified | Denied | Withdrawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2012 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2013 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2014 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2015 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2016 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2019 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2023 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2024 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2025 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2026 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
Decided in FY2016 to FY2023
All 1. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.
| Case | Decided | Outcome | Job | Offered wage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-15083-61313 | 2015-11-19 | certified | Software Developer - Client Side, MA | $70,179 |
Notes on these numbers
What these numbers don't say
5 notes
- The wage is the job, not the payer
- Their filings are led by Civil Engineers, 3 of 10. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
- Volume doesn’t change the wait
- DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 10 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
- The name is a legal entity
- DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 4,553. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
- A median over 7 decided cases
- That’s a middle of a handful, and it moves entirely with which months those few cases were filed in.
- Two sources, and they do not add up
- The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is FL. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built
Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load
Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 22, 2026 · daily
What each source includes
Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.
Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.
Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.