Updated
PERM sponsor, #505 of 70,985 by filings
Ally Bank
Ally Bank sponsors green cards: it filed 7 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on June 17, 2026. Ally Bank has 3 PERM cases waiting with DOL.
- Main job
- Software Developers · 30% of its filings
- Main worksite
- Charlotte, NC · 70% of its filings
- Industry
- Commercial Banking · NAICS 522110
Waiting on a case with Ally Bank?
- When it'll likely be decided
- An email when DOL moves it
This rate is level with the field
Over 72 decided filings, this rate can't be told apart from the field in either direction.
Why
The 95% interval runs up to a 7.5% denial rate, which still covers the 3.20% the field as a whole records.
Filings
73
#505 of 70,985
Certified
71
1 denied
Approval
98.6%
field 96.8%
Median wage
$139,050
offered, per year
Median days
464
2 faster than the field
Right now
DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.
Waiting on a decision
3
of 64 tracked cases. The other 61 have been decided.
The oldest one still waiting was filed January 21, 2026, 8 months ago.
Where those 3 are standing
- ANALYST REVIEW
- 3100%
A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.
None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.
Follow Ally Bank
An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.
What DOL has done to its cases as a group
Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.
Its newest filings
Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.
- G-100-26168-024437 Principal - Data Engineer filed 2026-06-17 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26152-968327 Principal - Software Engineer filed 2026-06-01 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26021-577710 Director - Quantitative Modeling filed 2026-01-21 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-25358-508994 Principal - Adv Bus Analytics filed 2025-12-24 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25357-505831 Manager - Bus Intel filed 2025-12-23 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25345-475510 Director - Software Engineer filed 2025-12-11 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25322-417889 Sr Engineer - Software Test filed 2025-11-18 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25261-317750 Principal - Business Intelligence filed 2025-09-18 · CERTIFIED
The 8 newest. Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
How long it takes
How long their cases are taking
- 302 days
Every employer
median of 29,126 decisions in the same 90 days
Only 4 of their cases were decided in the last 90 days, too few for a median of their own. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.
Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 80,651 cases, and would be decided around March 15, 2027 (between February 23, 2027 and April 24, 2027). Estimate another date
Every program
Across DOL's programs
The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.
- PERM (green card)
- 73 published
- 3 pending
- $139,050 median, n=72
- Prevailing wage requests
- 57 published
- 12 pending
- $128,232 median, n=57
- H-1B labor condition applications
- 565 published
- 2 pending
- $125,000 median, n=563
Its median H-1B wage is $125,000 across 563 LCAs, 10.1% lower than its median PERM wage of $139,050 across 72 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.
Every case across these programs is in the search.
How these are counted
Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.
Its newest wage requests and LCAs
Filed by Ally Bank, newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.
Wage requests
- P-100-26267-257476 Dir - Business Intel 2026-09-24 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26266-256637 Manager - Software Engineer 2026-09-23 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26266-254349 Sr Engineer - Software Eng 2026-09-23 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26261-244804 Principal - Data Science 2026-09-18 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26257-232046 Manager - Bus Intel 2026-09-14 · IN PROCESS
H-1B LCAs
- I-200-26289-306605 Dir - Software Eng Lead 2026-10-16 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26288-303586 MGR - SOFTWARE ENG 2026-10-15 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26274-274773 Manager – Software Engineering 2026-10-01 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-26268-260892 Sr. Analyst – Advance Business Analytics 2026-09-25 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-26266-254937 Fellow – Systems Eng 2026-09-23 · CERTIFIED
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
What its H-1B LCAs were for
From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 565 LCAs filed by Ally Bank, 515 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.
New hires and transfers
58 positions for new employment, 177 moving here from another employer.
- New employment 7a 58 · 11%
- Change of employer 7e 177 · 34%
- Continuing 7b 73 · 14%
- Change in previous employment 7c 58 · 11%
- Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
- Amended petition 7f 151 · 29%
Shares of the 515 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.
What each box on the form means
- New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
- Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
- Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
- Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
- Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
- Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.
Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.
Wage level it chose
- Level I 20 · 4%
- Level II 92 · 18%
- Level III 151 · 29%
- Level IV 252 · 49%
Shares of the 515 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 0 of 515 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.
What it declared on Section H
- H-1B-dependent
- No
- Found a willful violator
- No
As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 22, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 538 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 564. Both are the employer's own answers.
What the two answers mean
H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.
Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.
Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR
Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 564 · E-3 (Australia) 1. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.
Against other sponsors
Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.
How it compares with other sponsors
Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.
PERM approval rate
98.6% of 72 decided PERM cases
Higher than 23% of the 1,343 sponsors with 30 or more decided cases.
PERM filings in the last 12 months
7 filed in the last 12 months
Higher than 86% of the 13,949 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.
H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months
134 certified in the last 24 months
Higher than 98% of the 27,903 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.
Share of H-1B positions that were transfers
5.5% of 165 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 21% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.
Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV
69% of 165 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 84% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.
USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years
99.1% of 215 USCIS decisions
Higher than 56% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.
Approval rate
98.6%ahead of 23%
Median days to decision
464 daysahead of 51%
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Against the sponsors ranked nearest
The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 67 and 82 filings.
- Their median wait
- 458 days
- This one
- 464 days
This one sits 6 days behind them.
Why no approval rate
A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.
Where this sits in the ranking
Ranked 505 of 70,985 by volume: 504 filed at least as many filings, and 70,480 filed no more.
- Just above
- BNP Paribas RCC Inc. 73 filings
- Just below
- CSAA Insurance Services, Inc. 73 filings
Sponsors filing at the same rate
Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.
- #504 BNP Paribas RCC Inc. 73 filings · none denied
- #506 CSAA Insurance Services, Inc. 73 filings · none denied
- #503 NTT DATA Americas, Inc. 73 filings · none denied
- #507 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 73 filings · 3 denied
- #502 JIMENEZ CLEANING 74 filings · 68 denied
- #508 Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company 72 filings · none denied
Sponsors hiring for the same work
The employers filing the most PERM cases for Software Developers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.
What they file, and where
A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.
What the jobs are
SOC 15-1252.00 · 22 filings, 30% of everything they file
- Computer Systems Analysts 15-1211.0011
- Business Intelligence Analysts 15-2051.015
- Data Warehousing Specialists 15-1243.015
- Project Management Specialists 13-1082.005
- Computer and Information Systems Managers 11-3021.004
How this is counted
These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 52 of 73 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.
The industry they declared
Commercial Banking
NAICS 522110, 52211 · 73 filings
How this is counted
The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.
Where the jobs are
- North Carolina 51
- Michigan 13
- Texas 8
- Illinois 1
How this is counted
The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 4 states cover 73 of 73 filings.
Where the work is
- Charlotte, NC 51
- Detroit, MI 13
- Lewisville, TX 7
- Austin, TX 1
- Chicago, IL 1
How this is counted
The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 5 cities cover 73 of 73 filings.
Who files for them
- JACKSON LEWIS PC 72 filings · 98.6% approved
How this is counted
The law firm named on the application. 72 of 73 filings, 99% of the total.
Newspapers it advertised in
- 35 cases
The Charlotte Observer
- 10 cases
Detroit Free Press
- 7 cases
The Dallas Morning News
- 1 cases
Austin American-Statesman
- 1 cases
Chartlotte Observer
- 1 cases
Chicago Sun-Times
How this is counted
The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.
Additional steps it used
- 55 cases
Job search websites
- 55 cases
Local or ethnic newspapers
- 32 cases
Radio or TV ads
- 23 cases
Trade or professional organizations
How this is counted
The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.
How long before filing it began
- 0.0%
Under 30 days
- 0.0%
30 to 59 days
- 35%
60 to 89 days
- 42%
90 to 119 days
- 13%
120 to 149 days
- 11%
150 to 180 days
- 0.0%
Over 180 days
How this is counted
Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.
History
Year by year since 2016
142 PERM decisions from FY2016 to FY2026, busiest in FY2025 with 31.
- certified
- denied
- withdrawn
Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.
Every year as a table
| Fiscal year | Certified | Denied | Withdrawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2016 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2017 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2018 | 17 | 1 | 0 |
| FY2019 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| FY2020 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2021 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2022 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2023 | 18 | 1 | 1 |
| FY2024 | 22 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2025 | 30 | 1 | 0 |
| FY2026 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
Decided in FY2016 to FY2023
The 25 most recent of 69. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.
| Case | Decided | Outcome | Job | Offered wage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-22264-25896 | 2023-09-25 | certified | Principal - Tech Support, NC | $142,800 |
| A-22132-54196 | 2023-09-14 | denied | OpenShift Platforms Architect, AZ | $200,000 |
| A-22264-25773 | 2023-08-30 | certified | Director of Software Engineering, NC | $190,000 |
| A-22271-29471 | 2023-08-28 | certified | Principal-Software Developer, NC | $160,000 |
| A-22270-29050 | 2023-08-25 | certified | Director – Software Test, NC | $165,000 |
| A-22262-23867 | 2023-08-17 | certified | Sr. Engineer - Software Test, NC | $96,900 |
| A-22255-19904 | 2023-07-12 | certified | Sr. Analyst - Tech Products, MI | $99,826 |
| A-22164-70803 | 2023-06-05 | certified | Testing and Usability Manager, NC | $116,550 |
The other 17
| A-22187-84178 | 2023-04-11 | certified | Sr. Analyst - Model Validation, NC | $127,000 |
| A-22081-29115 | 2023-03-20 | certified | Principal - Tech Support, NC | $142,500 |
| A-22059-17125 | 2023-02-07 | certified | J2EE Technical Lead, MI | $135,000 |
| A-23006-83422 | 2023-01-23 | withdrawn | Principal - Software Engineer, NC | $160,000 |
| A-22116-46282 | 2023-01-23 | certified | Senior Application Developer, NC | $133,200 |
| A-22103-40381 | 2023-01-23 | certified | Senior API Engineer, NC | $160,000 |
| A-22055-15830 | 2023-01-23 | certified | Sr. Accountant, MI | $90,000 |
| A-22116-46404 | 2023-01-20 | certified | Model Validation Analyst, NC | $120,000 |
| A-22055-15831 | 2022-12-02 | certified | Senior Business Intelligence Analyst, TX | $109,650 |
| A-22081-28885 | 2022-12-02 | certified | Senior Developer - Software Development, NC | $113,030 |
| A-22060-17473 | 2022-12-02 | certified | Data Warehouse Developer, MI | $120,000 |
| A-22053-14452 | 2022-11-02 | certified | Sr. Developer - Software Development, MI | $120,000 |
| A-21361-90939 | 2022-08-29 | certified | Sr. Data Engineer, NC | $137,700 |
| A-21337-81301 | 2022-08-26 | certified | Cyber Security Engineer, NC | $126,443 |
| A-21335-79879 | 2022-07-11 | certified | Director, Data Management & Analytics, TX | $170,000 |
| A-21216-26878 | 2022-06-10 | certified | Senior Application Developer, NC | $130,000 |
| A-21237-36116 | 2022-05-11 | certified | Application Development Manager, NC | $132,500 |
Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023
From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.
Country of citizenship
- India 55
- Canada 7
- China 4
- Australia 1
- Mexico 1
- United States Of America 1
Worker's education
- Bachelor's 41
- Master's 28
Visa held when filed
- H-1B 69
Schools
- ANNA UNIVERSITY 4
- JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 3
- UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR 3
- BHARATHIAR UNIVERSITY 2
- JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY 2
- RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY 2
Fields of study
- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 7
- ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING 6
- COMPUTER SCIENCE 5
- COMPUTER ENGINEERING 3
- COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS 3
- ENGINEERING 3
Notes on these numbers
What this rank counts, and what it doesn't
DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The 3 entries below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #505 counts this page's cases only.
10 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.
What these numbers don't say
5 notes
- The wage is the job, not the payer
- Their filings are led by Software Developers, 22 of 73. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
- Volume doesn’t change the wait
- DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 73 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
- The name is a legal entity
- DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 505. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
- A median over 72 decided cases
- The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
- Two sources, and they do not add up
- The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is NC. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built
Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load
Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 19, 2026 · daily
What each source includes
Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.
Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.
Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.