Updated
PERM sponsor, #86 of 70,985 by filings
Visa Technology & Operations LLC
Visa Technology & Operations LLC has 1 PERM case waiting with DOL.
- Main job
- Software Developers · 41% of its filings
- Main worksite
- Austin, TX · 50% of its filings
- Industry
- Financial Transactions Processing, Reserve, and Clearinghouse Activities · NAICS 522320
Waiting on a case with Visa Technology & Operations LLC?
- When it'll likely be decided
- An email when DOL moves it
Filings
416
#86 of 70,985
Certified
387
1 denied
Approval
99.7%
field 96.8%
Median wage
$132,200
offered, per year
Median days
482
16 slower than the field
Right now
DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.
Waiting on a decision
1
of 325 tracked cases. The other 324 have been decided.
The oldest one still waiting was filed July 10, 2024, 27 months ago.
Where those 1 are standing
- BALCA APPEALS
- 1100%
The case is with the Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals, a panel of DOL administrative law judges. They review the record the officer already had, so it's legal argument rather than a fresh chance to put in evidence.
None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.
Follow Visa Technology & Operations LLC
An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.
What DOL has done to its cases as a group
Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.
Its newest filings
Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.
- G-100-25272-340804 Staff Site Reliability Engineer filed 2025-09-29 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25227-246333 Sr. Manager filed 2025-08-15 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25191-165846 Software Engineer - Sr. Consultant level filed 2025-07-10 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25188-157140 Technical Product Manager filed 2025-07-06 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25178-134681 Staff Site Reliability Engineer filed 2025-06-27 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-25161-074454 Sr. Manager, Data Engineering filed 2025-06-10 · CERTIFIED
- G-100-24193-188259 Staff SW Engineer filed 2024-07-10 · BALCA APPEALS
- G-100-23200-198724 Staff SW Engineer filed 2023-07-19 · WITHDRAWN
Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
How long it takes
How long their cases are taking
- 301 days
Every employer
median of 30,678 decisions in the same 90 days
Only 1 of their cases was decided in the last 90 days, too few for a median of their own. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.
Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 80,135 cases, and would be decided around March 20, 2027 (between February 28, 2027 and April 29, 2027). Estimate another date
Every program
Across DOL's programs
The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.
- PERM (green card)
- 416 published
- 1 pending
- $132,200 median, n=416
- Prevailing wage requests
- 440 published
- 1 pending
- $133,952 median, n=413
- H-1B labor condition applications
- 3,738 published
- 9 pending
- $124,904 median, n=3,734
Its median H-1B wage is $124,904 across 3,734 LCAs, 5.5% lower than its median PERM wage of $132,200 across 416 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.
Every case across these programs is in the search.
How these are counted
Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name, read under the 5 spellings DOL's files use for it; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.
Its newest wage requests and LCAs
Filed by Visa Technology & Operations LLC, newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.
Wage requests
- P-100-26203-116717 Sr. Manager 2026-07-22 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26196-100405 Sr. SW Engineer 2026-07-15 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
- P-100-26196-099955 Senior Data Engineer 2026-07-15 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
- P-100-26189-085127 Sr. Site Reliability Engineer 2026-07-08 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
- P-100-26183-073618 Staff Site Reliability Engineer 2026-07-02 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
H-1B LCAs
- I-200-26293-312415 Lead Systems Engineer 2026-10-20 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26293-311420 Staff SW Engineer 2026-10-20 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26292-308186 Principal Data Engineer 2026-10-19 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26289-306778 Sr. SW Engineer 2026-10-16 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26289-305760 Sr. SW Engineer 2026-10-16 · IN PROCESS
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
What its H-1B LCAs were for
From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 3,738 LCAs filed by Visa Technology & Operations LLC, 3,656 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.
New hires and transfers
1,659 positions for new employment, 679 moving here from another employer.
- New employment 7a 1,659 · 34%
- Change of employer 7e 679 · 14%
- Continuing 7b 2,149 · 45%
- Change in previous employment 7c 96 · 2%
- Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
- Amended petition 7f 239 · 5%
Shares of the 4,822 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.
What each box on the form means
- New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
- Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
- Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
- Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
- Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
- Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.
Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.
Wage level it chose
- Level I 100 · 3%
- Level II 1,071 · 33%
- Level III 494 · 15%
- Level IV 1,561 · 48%
Shares of the 3,226 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 430 of 3,656 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.
What it declared on Section H
- H-1B-dependent
- Yes
- Found a willful violator
- No
As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 23, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 2,803 of 3,511 LCAs, and a willful violator on 3 of 3,723. Both are the employer's own answers.
What the two answers mean
H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.
Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.
Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR
Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 3,723 · E-3 (Australia) 12 · H-1B1 (Singapore) 3. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.
Against other sponsors
Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.
How it compares with other sponsors
Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.
PERM approval rate
99.7% of 388 decided PERM cases
Higher than 32% of the 1,343 sponsors with 30 or more decided cases.
H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months
881 certified in the last 24 months
At the top of the 27,902 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.
Share of H-1B positions that were transfers
7.8% of 1,024 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 29% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.
Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV
73% of 905 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 87% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.
USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years
99.0% of 1,218 USCIS decisions
Higher than 55% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.
Also on its record
- Its newest LCA that answered declared it H-1B dependent (decided 2026-06-30).
- It declared itself a willful violator on 3 LCAs.
Approval rate
99.7%ahead of 32%
Median days to decision
482 daysahead of 25%
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Against the sponsors ranked nearest
The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 259 and 1,108 filings.
- Their median wait
- 461 days
- This one
- 482 days
This one sits 21 days behind them.
Why no approval rate
A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.
Where this sits in the ranking
Ranked 86 of 70,985 by volume: 85 filed at least as many filings, and 70,899 filed no more.
- Just above
- Sapphire Software Solutions, Inc. 424 filings
- Just below
- Charles Schwab & Company, Inc. 412 filings
Sponsors filing at the same rate
Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.
- #85 Sapphire Software Solutions, Inc. 424 filings · 2 denied
- #87 Charles Schwab & Company, Inc. 412 filings · 2 denied
- #84 Lucid USA, Inc. 424 filings · 2 denied
- #88 Charter Communications, Inc. 408 filings · 3 denied
- #83 Expedia, Inc. 425 filings · 5 denied
- #89 DFS Corporate Services LLC 408 filings · none denied
Sponsors hiring for the same work
The employers filing the most PERM cases for Software Developers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.
What they file, and where
A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.
What the jobs are
SOC 15-1252.00 · 170 filings, 41% of everything they file · 100.0% approved
- Computer Systems Analysts 15-1211.0053
- Information Security Analysts 15-1212.0034
- Project Management Specialists 13-1082.0025
- Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers 15-1253.0022
- Computer and Information Systems Managers 11-3021.009
How this is counted
These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 313 of 416 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.
The industry they declared
Financial Transactions Processing, Reserve, and Clearinghouse Activities
NAICS 522320, 52232 · 416 filings
How this is counted
The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.
Where the jobs are
- Texas 206
- California 112
- Colorado 47
- Georgia 32
- Virginia 17
- Utah 1
How this is counted
The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 6 states cover 415 of 416 filings.
Where the work is
- Austin, TX 206
- Foster City, CA 101
- Highlands Ranch, CO 46
- Atlanta, GA 32
- Ashburn, VA 17
- Palo Alto, CA 11
How this is counted
The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 6 cities cover 413 of 416 filings.
Who files for them
- Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP 415 filings · 99.7% approved
- Berry Applemen Leiden LLP 1 filings
How this is counted
The law firm named on the application. 416 of 416 filings, 100% of the total.
Newspapers it advertised in
- 150 cases
Austin American-Statesman
- 79 cases
San Francisco Chronicle
- 31 cases
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
- 27 cases
The Denver Post
- 15 cases
The Washington Post
- 9 cases
The Mercury News
How this is counted
The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.
Additional steps it used
- 315 cases
Job search websites
- 279 cases
Local or ethnic newspapers
- 279 cases
Radio or TV ads
- 40 cases
The employer's website
- 38 cases
Employee referral programs
How this is counted
The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.
How long before filing it began
- 0.0%
Under 30 days
- 0.0%
30 to 59 days
- 4.7%
60 to 89 days
- 11%
90 to 119 days
- 18%
120 to 149 days
- 66%
150 to 180 days
- 0.6%
Over 180 days
How this is counted
Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.
History
Year by year since 2018
1,177 PERM decisions from FY2018 to FY2026, busiest in FY2025 with 240.
- certified
- denied
- withdrawn
Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.
Every year as a table
| Fiscal year | Certified | Denied | Withdrawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2018 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2019 | 124 | 1 | 3 |
| FY2020 | 171 | 0 | 3 |
| FY2021 | 129 | 1 | 8 |
| FY2022 | 156 | 0 | 3 |
| FY2023 | 114 | 0 | 21 |
| FY2024 | 130 | 1 | 9 |
| FY2025 | 222 | 0 | 18 |
| FY2026 | 35 | 0 | 1 |
Decided in FY2016 to FY2023
The 25 most recent of 761. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.
| Case | Decided | Outcome | Job | Offered wage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-22314-55787 | 2023-09-28 | withdrawn | Cybersecurity Engineer, CA | $157,510 |
| A-22285-37934 | 2023-09-22 | certified | Data Scientist, VA | $124,900 |
| A-22281-36009 | 2023-09-12 | certified | Systems Analyst, TX | $139,860 |
| A-22277-33163 | 2023-08-31 | certified | Sr. Systems Engineer, TX | $119,600 |
| A-22209-96569 | 2023-08-30 | certified | Senior Software Engineer, TX | $102,655 |
| A-22259-23064 | 2023-08-29 | certified | Sr. SW Test Engineer, CO | $110,700 |
| A-22202-92451 | 2023-08-25 | certified | Lead Data Engineer, CA | $234,200 |
| A-22265-26283 | 2023-08-24 | certified | Sr. SW Engineer, CO | $116,760 |
The other 17
| A-22210-97186 | 2023-08-23 | certified | Cybersecurity Engineer, CO | $138,966 |
| A-22208-96010 | 2023-08-18 | certified | Sr. SW Test Engineer, TX | $102,821 |
| A-22238-12715 | 2023-08-11 | certified | Sr. Systems Analyst, TX | $124,800 |
| A-22210-97091 | 2023-08-09 | certified | Sr. SW Engineer, CO | $116,480 |
| A-22199-89969 | 2023-08-08 | certified | Sr SW Engineer, TX | $127,504 |
| A-22166-72171 | 2023-08-08 | certified | Sr. SW Engineer, TX | $127,504 |
| A-22146-61825 | 2023-08-01 | certified | Systems Analyst, TX | $109,200 |
| A-22266-27256 | 2023-07-31 | certified | Systems Analyst, CO | $97,218 |
| A-22238-12578 | 2023-07-27 | certified | Systems Analyst, TX | $105,000 |
| A-22094-35039 | 2023-07-27 | withdrawn | Lead Systems Analyst, CA | $165,816 |
| A-22118-47773 | 2023-07-21 | certified | Sr. Software Engineer, CA | $122,265 |
| A-22061-18160 | 2023-07-21 | certified | Sr. SW Engineer, TX | $110,090 |
| A-22210-97097 | 2023-07-20 | certified | Project Analyst, TX | $131,206 |
| A-22174-77478 | 2023-07-19 | certified | Sr. Systems Administrator, CO | $123,930 |
| A-22199-90011 | 2023-07-19 | certified | Staff SW Engineer, TX | $127,504 |
| A-22259-22685 | 2023-07-19 | certified | Cybersecurity Engineer, VA | $131,084 |
| A-22210-97016 | 2023-07-19 | certified | Sr. Systems Analyst, TX | $116,620 |
Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023
From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.
Country of citizenship
- India 670
- China 43
- Nigeria 21
- Mexico 7
- Canada 3
- Taiwan 2
Worker's education
- Master's 498
- Bachelor's 243
- None 11
- Doctorate 9
Visa held when filed
- H-1B 734
- L-1 18
- F-1 5
- H-4 2
- TN 2
Schools
- JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 28
- SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY 25
- UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 25
- THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 17
- ANNA UNIVERSITY 16
- SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY 16
Fields of study
- COMPUTER SCIENCE 183
- COMPUTER ENGINEERING 88
- ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 60
- ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 47
- APPLIED COMPUTER SCIENCE 35
- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 35
Notes on these numbers
What this rank counts, and what it doesn't
DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The entry below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #86 counts this page's cases only.
262 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.
What these numbers don't say
5 notes
- The wage is the job, not the payer
- Their filings are led by Software Developers, 170 of 416. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
- Volume doesn’t change the wait
- DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 416 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
- The name is a legal entity
- DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 86. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
- A median over 388 decided cases
- The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
- Two sources, and they do not add up
- The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is TX. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built
Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load
Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 21, 2026 · daily
What each source includes
Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.
Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.
Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.