All sponsors · #1,515 of 71,512 by volume
Nemak USA, Inc.
28 PERM filings in DOL's current disclosure window, 27 certified and 0 denied. Name as DOL prints it, which is the legal entity on the form.
Too few cases for a rate
27 decided filings, so there's no approval rate here. Across every PERM case DOL decided in this window, 3.20% were denied. At that rate a file this size comes back clean most of the time whatever the sponsor did, so a percentage would be a fact about how few cases there are. Telling a clean record apart from the field takes about 117 decided cases.
Filings
28
#1,515 of 71,512
Certified
27
0 denied
Approval
—
withheld: 27 decided
Median wage
—
not on file
Median days
445
20 faster than the field
Waiting on a decision
16
of 44 tracked cases. The other 28 have been decided.
The oldest one still waiting was filed November 13, 2025, 9 months ago.
Where those 16 are standing
- ANALYST REVIEW
- 16100%
A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.
A queue position is national and first in, first out, so none of this changes what any one case waits. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.
Latest filings, live from DOL
Newer than DOL's published files, so the wage and law firm aren't known yet. Each case links to its live status.
- G-100-26181-068702 Lean Engineering Manager filed 2026-06-30 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26121-857928 Sr. Project Engineer filed 2026-05-01 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26120-856162 Plant Purchasing Manager filed 2026-04-30 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26105-798921 SQA Leader NA filed 2026-04-15 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26099-774792 PLC EXPERT filed 2026-04-09 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26099-773861 Sr. Quality Engineer filed 2026-04-09 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26047-643489 Operational Excellence Sr. Specialist filed 2026-02-16 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-25356-502709 Sr. Process Engineer filed 2025-12-22 · ANALYST REVIEW
Approval rate
not shownunder 30 decided
Median days to decision
445 daysmiddle of 27 decided, too few to rank
What they file, and where
A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor actually turns on.
What the jobs are
SOC 17-2112.03 · 11 filings, 39% of everything they file
- Industrial Production Managers 11-3051.004
- Industrial Engineers 17-2112.002
- Industrial Engineers 17-21122
- Architectural and Engineering Managers 11-9041.001
- Materials Engineers 17-2131.001
These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 21 of 28 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.
Where the jobs are
- Alabama 13
- Wisconsin 11
- Kentucky 2
- Michigan 1
The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 4 states cover 27 of 28 filings.
Who files for them
- Ellis Porter PLC 28 filings
The law firm named on the application. 28 of 28 filings, 100% of the total.
Against the sponsors ranked nearest
The 120 sponsors ranked nearest this one filed between 27 and 29 filings. Their median wait is 459 days, and this one sits 14 days ahead of that. No approval rate is given for the band. A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.
Where this sits in the ranking
Ranked 1,515 of 71,512 by volume: 1,514 filed at least as many filings, and 69,997 filed no more.
- Just above
- Credit Suisse Services (USA) LLC 28 filings
- Just below
- University of South Carolina 28 filings
Sponsors filing at the same rate
The sponsors ranked either side of this one, which is the same as saying they file about as many PERM cases a year. Worksite state isn't carried per employer in this data, so these are volume peers rather than neighbours; filings by state are on the state map.
- #1,514 Credit Suisse Services (USA) LLC 28 filings · none denied
- #1,516 University of South Carolina 28 filings · 1 denied
- #1,513 Electrolux Home Products Inc. 28 filings · none denied
- #1,517 Tarkett USA, Inc. 28 filings · none denied
- #1,512 Marelli North America, Inc. 28 filings · none denied
- #1,518 Kite Pharma Inc. 28 filings · none denied
What this rank counts, and what it doesn't
DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The entry below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #1,515 counts this page's cases only.
1 filing sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.
What these numbers don't say
- The wage is the job, not the payer
- The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
- Volume doesn’t change the wait
- DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so a company with four thousand filings waits exactly as long as one with three.
- The name is a legal entity
- DOL prints whatever went on the form. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
- A median over 27 decided cases
- The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
- Two sources, and they do not add up
- The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
The window these figures cover
DOL's FY2026 Q3 and FY2025 Q4 and New Form FY2024 Q4 and FY2024 Q4 PERM disclosure files, unioned and de-duplicated by case number: 373,939 cases. Every case in them carries a decision, so nothing here counts what’s still pending. How each figure is built, and what it can and can't answer, is set out in the methodology.
Your case is with them?
The decision estimator reads your filing month against where DOL is now.
Comparing sponsors?
The full ranking sorts every column, and wages by occupation covers what the roles pay.
Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Employers and firms: Derived from the disclosure corpus · data through Aug 26, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly ingest
Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Sep 1, 2026 · daily