PERM Tracker
Live DOL data · Automatic deadlines
Skip to main content

Updated

PERM sponsor, #1,885 of 70,985 by filings

Fluor Enterprises, Inc.

Fluor Enterprises, Inc. sponsors green cards: it filed 11 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on October 17, 2026. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. has 9 PERM cases waiting with DOL.

Main job
Civil Engineers · 13% of its filings
Main worksite
Lewisville, TX · 26% of its filings
Industry
Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction · NAICS 23799

Waiting on a case with Fluor Enterprises, Inc.?

  • When it'll likely be decided
  • An email when DOL moves it

It's on your ETA-9089 receipt. It goes into the page's address, so you can bookmark the result.

Don't have the number? Find it among their filings.

Or follow this employer by email

Too few cases for a rate

23 decided filings: too few for an approval rate.

Why

Across every PERM case DOL decided in this window, 3.20% were denied. At that rate a file this size comes back clean most of the time whatever the sponsor did, so a percentage would be a fact about how few cases there are. Telling a clean record apart from the field takes about 117 decided cases.

Filings

23

#1,885 of 70,985

Certified

21

2 denied

Approval

Not shown

withheld: 23 decided

Median wage

$121,638

offered, per year

Median days

463

3 faster than the field

Right now

DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.

In the queue right now 33 cases in the live tracker

Waiting on a decision

9

of 33 tracked cases. The other 24 have been decided.

The oldest one still waiting was filed April 11, 2025, 18 months ago.

Where those 9 are standing

ANALYST REVIEW
667%

A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.

RECONSIDERATION APPEALS
333%

The employer has asked the same officer who denied the case to look at it again, within 30 days of the denial. The request can only use documents DOL already had, so new evidence can't be added to fix what the denial was based on.

None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.

From DOL's live status of 33 of this sponsor's cases: read this share against 33, never against the lifetime filings above. Live case tracker, as of October 22, 2026

Follow Fluor Enterprises, Inc.

An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.

What DOL has done to its cases as a group

Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.

You confirm by email first. One click turns it off.

Its newest filings

Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.

The 8 newest. Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

How long it takes

How long their cases are taking

  1. Fluor Enterprises, Inc.

    median of 6 decisions in the last 90 days

    303 days

  2. Every employer

    median of 31,475 decisions in the same 90 days

    301 days

About the same as everyone: DOL works one national line in filing order. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.

Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 79,834 cases, and would be decided around March 21, 2027 (between March 1, 2027 and April 30, 2027). Estimate another date

Every program

Across DOL's programs

The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.

PERM (green card)
23 published
9 pending
$121,638 median, n=23
Prevailing wage requests
35 published
5 pending
$131,040 median, n=35
H-1B labor condition applications
216 published
0 pending
$110,586 median, n=215

Its median H-1B wage is $110,586 across 215 LCAs, 9.1% lower than its median PERM wage of $121,638 across 23 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.

Of its 9 pending PERM cases, 3 (33%) sit outside DOL's normal queue: 3 under appeal. Where that sits among every employer.

Every case across these programs is in the search.

How these are counted

Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.

Its newest wage requests and LCAs

Filed by Fluor Enterprises, Inc., newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.

Wage requests

All wage requests by this employer

H-1B LCAs

All H-1B LCAs by this employer

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

What its H-1B LCAs were for

From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 216 LCAs filed by Fluor Enterprises, Inc., 205 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.

New hires and transfers

92 positions for new employment, 24 moving here from another employer.

  • New employment 7a 92 · 45%
  • Change of employer 7e 24 · 12%
  • Continuing 7b 17 · 8%
  • Change in previous employment 7c 41 · 20%
  • Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
  • Amended petition 7f 31 · 15%

Shares of the 205 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.

What each box on the form means
  • New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
  • Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
  • Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
  • Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
  • Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
  • Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.

Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.

Wage level it chose

  • Level I 32 · 17%
  • Level II 49 · 27%
  • Level III 23 · 13%
  • Level IV 80 · 43%

Shares of the 184 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 21 of 205 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.

What it declared on Section H

H-1B-dependent
No
Found a willful violator
No

As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 23, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 201 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 214. Both are the employer's own answers.

What the two answers mean

H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.

Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.

Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR

Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 213 · E-3 (Australia) 1 · H-1B1 (Singapore) 2. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.

Against other sponsors

Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.

Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.

  • PERM filings in the last 12 months

    11 filed in the last 12 months

    Higher than 91% of the 14,027 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.

  • H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months

    80 certified in the last 24 months

    Higher than 96% of the 27,873 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.

  • Share of H-1B positions that were transfers

    7.7% of 91 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 28% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.

  • Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV

    60% of 81 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 75% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.

  • USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years

    98.8% of 83 USCIS decisions

    Higher than 53% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.

Position in the field 1,343 sponsors with 30+ decided

Approval rate

not shownunder 30 decided

0% 100%

Median days to decision

463 daysmiddle of 23 decided, too few to rank

5d 1152d
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. Sponsors with fewer than 30 decided cases are left out of the population rather than plotted, because a rate over a handful of cases lands wherever the handful landed. This sponsor has 23 decided cases, so its median days is marked but left unranked, and no approval rate is drawn at all.
DOL PERM disclosure files

Against the sponsors ranked nearest

The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 23 and 24 filings.

Their median wait
461 days
This one
463 days

This one sits 2 days behind them.

Why no approval rate

A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.

Where this sits in the ranking

Ranked 1,885 of 70,985 by volume: 1,884 filed at least as many filings, and 69,100 filed no more.

Just above
Ardor IT Solutions Inc 23 filings
Just below
eNcloud Services LLC 23 filings

Sponsors filing at the same rate

Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.

Sponsors hiring for the same work

The employers filing the most PERM cases for Civil Engineers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.

What they file, and where

A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.

What the jobs are

Civil Engineers

SOC 17-2051 · 3 filings, 13% of everything they file

How this is counted

These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 14 of 23 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.

The industry they declared

Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

NAICS 23799 · 12 filings

  • Engineering Services 54133011
How this is counted

The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.

Where the jobs are

  • Texas 13
  • California 5
  • South Carolina 5
How this is counted

The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 3 states cover 23 of 23 filings.

Where the work is

  • Lewisville, TX 6
  • Aliso Viejo, CA 5
  • Greenville, SC 5
  • Sugar Land, TX 5
  • Houston, TX 2
How this is counted

The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 5 cities cover 23 of 23 filings.

Who files for them

  1. Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP 23 filings
How this is counted

The law firm named on the application. 23 of 23 filings, 100% of the total.

Newspapers it advertised in

  1. The Dallas Morning News

    5 cases

  2. Houston Chronicle

    5 cases

  3. Los Angeles Times

    4 cases

  4. Spartanburg Herald-Journal

    3 cases

  5. The Greenville News

    2 cases
How this is counted

The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.

Additional steps it used

  1. Job search websites

    19 cases

  2. Local or ethnic newspapers

    19 cases

  3. Radio or TV ads

    19 cases
How this is counted

The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.

How long before filing it began

  1. Under 30 days

    0.0%

  2. 30 to 59 days

    0.0%

  3. 60 to 89 days

    26%

  4. 90 to 119 days

    32%

  5. 120 to 149 days

    26%

  6. 150 to 180 days

    16%

  7. Over 180 days

    0.0%
How this is counted

Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.

Where every PERM employer recruits

History

Year by year since 2008

191 PERM decisions from FY2008 to FY2026, busiest in FY2015 with 40.

  • certified
  • denied
  • withdrawn

Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.

Every year as a table
Fiscal year Certified Denied Withdrawn
FY2008 8 1 0
FY2009 9 1 5
FY2010 1 0 0
FY2011 5 1 0
FY2012 12 0 0
FY2013 7 1 1
FY2014 13 1 2
FY2015 32 6 2
FY2016 20 0 1
FY2017 12 0 0
FY2018 7 0 0
FY2019 6 0 0
FY2020 2 0 1
FY2021 4 0 0
FY2022 1 0 0
FY2023 4 1 1
FY2024 5 0 0
FY2025 10 0 0
FY2026 6 2 0

Decided in FY2016 to FY2023

The 25 most recent of 60. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.

Case Decided Outcome Job Offered wage
A-22216-00388 2023-06-14 certified Senior Estimator, SC $154,500
A-22136-55801 2023-06-12 withdrawn Data Scientist, TX $86,520
A-22208-95703 2023-05-24 certified Director 1, Project Business Services, MI $172,286
A-22111-44500 2023-05-23 denied Data Scientist, TX $86,520
A-22066-20112 2023-03-14 certified Director 1, Sales, SC $162,282
A-22110-43384 2022-12-28 certified Principal IT Operations Specialist, TX $155,703
A-22021-01257 2022-09-20 certified Project Manager 3, CA $185,000
A-21028-46925 2021-08-02 certified Principal Design Engineer, CA $169,950
The other 17
A-20065-27041 2021-03-24 certified Senior Project Automation Specialist, TX $116,225
A-20055-22749 2021-03-24 certified Senior Design Engineer, SC $130,000
A-19323-85312 2020-12-11 certified Engineering Manager, SC $140,000
A-20189-73738 2020-09-11 withdrawn Senior Project Controls Specialist, IL $125,000
A-19302-76869 2020-04-06 certified Construction Engineer VII, TX $140,171
A-19203-34087 2019-10-10 certified Logistics Contracts Manager, TX $119,000
A-19170-20692 2019-09-06 certified Principal Project Controls Specialist, MD $130,000
A-19044-73021 2019-05-17 certified Principal Electrical Engineer, CA $161,195
A-19024-65986 2019-05-02 certified Process/Specialty Engineer IV, SC $132,083
A-18351-53604 2019-04-04 certified Senior Auditor, SC $84,178
A-18129-73654 2018-12-10 certified Principal Design Engineer, CA $156,500
A-18237-11356 2018-10-23 certified Executive Director, Global Fabrication, TX $240,000
A-18200-99447 2018-09-20 certified Construction Engineer VII, TX $137,592
A-18109-65762 2018-08-14 certified Principal Specialist Material Management, TX $90,792
A-18058-47957 2018-06-26 certified Director II Construction Support, TX $170,000
A-17286-98749 2018-03-13 certified Associate Project Controls Specialist III, MD $75,442
A-17251-85123 2018-02-08 certified Design Engineer III, TX $119,704

Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023

From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.

Country of citizenship

  • India 19
  • Canada 8
  • United Kingdom 5
  • China 4
  • Chile 3
  • Venezuela 3

Worker's education

  • Bachelor's 33
  • Master's 20
  • None 5
  • Doctorate 2

Visa held when filed

  • L-1 36
  • H-1B 23
  • NOT IN USA 1

Schools

  • PANJAB UNIVERSITY 2
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES 2
  • UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES 2
  • UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY 2
  • UNIVERSITY OF DELHI 2
  • UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA 2

Fields of study

  • CHEMICAL ENGINEERING 11
  • MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 8
  • CIVIL ENGINEERING 6
  • ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 4
  • BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 2
  • ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT 2

Notes on these numbers

What these numbers don't say

5 notes
The wage is the job, not the payer
Their filings are led by Civil Engineers, 3 of 23. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
Volume doesn’t change the wait
DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 23 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
The name is a legal entity
DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 1,885. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
A median over 23 decided cases
The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
Two sources, and they do not add up
The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is TX. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.

The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built

Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load

Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 22, 2026 · daily

What each source includes

Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.

Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.

Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.

Cite this page