PERM Tracker
Live DOL data · Automatic deadlines
Skip to main content

Updated

PERM sponsor, #3,737 of 70,985 by filings

Extreme Networks, Inc.

Main job
Software Developers · 33% of its filings
Main worksite
Morrisville, NC · 75% of its filings
Industry
Computer Storage Device Manufacturing · NAICS 334112

Waiting on a case with Extreme Networks, Inc.?

  • When it'll likely be decided
  • An email when DOL moves it

It's on your ETA-9089 receipt. It goes into the page's address, so you can bookmark the result.

Don't have the number? Find it among their filings.

Or follow this employer by email

Too few cases for a rate

12 decided filings: too few for an approval rate.

Why

Across every PERM case DOL decided in this window, 3.20% were denied. At that rate a file this size comes back clean most of the time whatever the sponsor did, so a percentage would be a fact about how few cases there are. Telling a clean record apart from the field takes about 117 decided cases.

Filings

12

#3,737 of 70,985

Certified

12

0 denied

Approval

Not shown

withheld: 12 decided

Median wage

$129,522

offered, per year

Median days

460

6 faster than the field

Right now

DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.

In the queue right now 9 cases in the live tracker

Nothing for this sponsor is waiting on a decision. All 9 of their cases in the live tracker are closed.

All 9 of this sponsor's cases in DOL's live status are decided: nothing of theirs is in the queue. Live case tracker, as of October 23, 2026

Follow Extreme Networks, Inc.

An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.

What DOL has done to its cases as a group

Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.

You confirm by email first. One click turns it off.

How long it takes

How long their cases are taking

  1. Every employer

    median of 31,712 decisions in the same 90 days

    301 days

None of their cases were decided in the last 90 days, too few for a median of their own. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.

Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 79,711 cases, and would be decided around March 20, 2027 (between February 28, 2027 and April 29, 2027). Estimate another date

Every program

Across DOL's programs

The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.

PERM (green card)
12 published
0 pending
$129,522 median, n=12
Prevailing wage requests
13 published
6 pending
$129,522 median, n=13
H-1B labor condition applications
178 published
0 pending
$132,579 median, n=177

Its median H-1B wage is $132,579 across 177 LCAs, 2.4% higher than its median PERM wage of $129,522 across 12 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.

Every case across these programs is in the search.

How these are counted

Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.

Its newest wage requests and LCAs

Filed by Extreme Networks, Inc., newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.

Wage requests

All wage requests by this employer

H-1B LCAs

All H-1B LCAs by this employer

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

What its H-1B LCAs were for

From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 178 LCAs filed by Extreme Networks, Inc., 173 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.

New hires and transfers

41 positions for new employment, 33 moving here from another employer.

  • New employment 7a 41 · 24%
  • Change of employer 7e 33 · 19%
  • Continuing 7b 76 · 44%
  • Change in previous employment 7c 5 · 3%
  • Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
  • Amended petition 7f 19 · 11%

Shares of the 173 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.

What each box on the form means
  • New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
  • Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
  • Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
  • Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
  • Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
  • Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.

Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.

Wage level it chose

  • Level I 8 · 5%
  • Level II 43 · 28%
  • Level III 63 · 41%
  • Level IV 40 · 26%

Shares of the 154 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 19 of 173 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.

What it declared on Section H

H-1B-dependent
No
Found a willful violator
No

As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 23, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 164 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 178. Both are the employer's own answers.

What the two answers mean

H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.

Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.

Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR

Against other sponsors

Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.

Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.

  • H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months

    49 certified in the last 24 months

    Higher than 93% of the 27,861 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.

  • Share of H-1B positions that were transfers

    32% of 59 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 85% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.

  • Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV

    74% of 47 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 89% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.

  • USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years

    100.0% of 66 USCIS decisions

    Higher than 80% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.

Position in the field 1,343 sponsors with 30+ decided

Approval rate

not shownunder 30 decided

0% 100%

Median days to decision

460 daysmiddle of 12 decided, too few to rank

5d 1152d
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. Sponsors with fewer than 30 decided cases are left out of the population rather than plotted, because a rate over a handful of cases lands wherever the handful landed. This sponsor has 12 decided cases, so its median days is marked but left unranked, and no approval rate is drawn at all.
DOL PERM disclosure files

Against the sponsors ranked nearest

The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 12 and 13 filings.

Their median wait
470 days
This one
460 days

This one sits 10 days ahead of them.

Why no approval rate

A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.

Where this sits in the ranking

Ranked 3,737 of 70,985 by volume: 3,736 filed at least as many filings, and 67,248 filed no more.

Just above
Mettler-Toledo, LLC 12 filings
Just below
GRANITE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC 12 filings

Sponsors filing at the same rate

Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.

Sponsors hiring for the same work

The employers filing the most PERM cases for Software Developers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.

What they file, and where

A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.

What the jobs are

Software Developers

SOC 15-1252.00 · 4 filings, 33% of everything they file

How this is counted

These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 10 of 12 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.

The industry they declared

Computer Storage Device Manufacturing

NAICS 334112 · 7 filings

  • Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing 334115
How this is counted

The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.

Where the jobs are

  • North Carolina 9
  • California 2
  • New Hampshire 1
How this is counted

The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 3 states cover 12 of 12 filings.

Where the work is

  • Morrisville, NC 9
  • San Jose, CA 2
  • Salem, NH 1
How this is counted

The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 3 cities cover 12 of 12 filings.

Who files for them

  1. Tafapolsky & Smith LLP 7 filings
  2. Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP 5 filings
How this is counted

The law firm named on the application. 12 of 12 filings, 100% of the total.

Newspapers it advertised in

  1. The News & Observer

    3 cases

  2. The Mercury News

    2 cases

  3. Raleigh News & Observer

    2 cases

  4. New Hampshire Sunday News

    1 cases

  5. The News & Observer/The Herald-Sun

    1 cases
How this is counted

The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.

Additional steps it used

  1. Job search websites

    9 cases

  2. Local or ethnic newspapers

    9 cases

  3. Trade or professional organizations

    9 cases
How this is counted

The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.

How long before filing it began

  1. Under 30 days

    0.0%

  2. 30 to 59 days

    0.0%

  3. 60 to 89 days

    11%

  4. 90 to 119 days

    44%

  5. 120 to 149 days

    11%

  6. 150 to 180 days

    33%

  7. Over 180 days

    0.0%
How this is counted

Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.

Where every PERM employer recruits

History

Year by year since 2008

98 PERM decisions from FY2008 to FY2026, busiest in FY2019 with 12.

  • certified
  • denied
  • withdrawn

Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.

Every year as a table
Fiscal year Certified Denied Withdrawn
FY2008 10 1 0
FY2009 2 0 1
FY2010 6 1 1
FY2011 3 0 0
FY2012 0 0 0
FY2013 2 0 0
FY2014 4 0 0
FY2015 5 0 0
FY2016 6 0 0
FY2017 2 0 0
FY2018 6 0 0
FY2019 12 0 0
FY2020 10 0 0
FY2021 2 0 0
FY2022 4 0 0
FY2023 6 0 2
FY2024 3 0 0
FY2025 4 0 0
FY2026 5 0 0

Decided in FY2016 to FY2023

The 25 most recent of 50. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.

Case Decided Outcome Job Offered wage
A-22228-06651 2023-09-26 certified SR IS ENGINEER, NH $117,000
A-22228-06617 2023-08-25 certified STAFF SW APPLICATIONS ENGINEER, CA $176,202
A-22134-55371 2023-07-10 certified STAFF SW SYSTEMS ENGINEER, CA $174,247
A-23111-31477 2023-05-24 withdrawn PRINCIPAL SW SYSTEMS ENGINEER, NC $173,451
A-23110-30564 2023-05-24 withdrawn STAFF WEB DEVELOPER, NC $130,000
A-22134-55377 2023-05-01 certified STAFF QA SW ENGINEER, CA $153,300
A-22134-55374 2023-05-01 certified STAFF SW APPLICATIONS ENGINEER, CA $184,080
A-22043-10836 2022-12-21 certified SR QA SW ENGINEER, CA $145,000
The other 17
A-21328-77907 2022-09-12 certified Staff SW Applications Engineer, NH $142,100
A-21327-77417 2022-09-12 certified SR SW SYSTEMS ENGINEER, CA $130,894
A-21204-21956 2022-02-02 certified Sr. Technical Writer, NC $79,791
A-21187-12669 2021-12-23 certified Sr. QA Software Engineer, CA $164,000
A-20309-16556 2021-06-16 certified Senior Manager - Global Trade Compliance, NH $159,744
A-20142-57458 2021-03-05 certified Technical Support Engineer, NC $95,000
A-20073-30759 2020-09-30 certified Staff Software Engineer, CA $172,640
A-19280-67681 2020-09-30 certified Staff SW Systems Engineer, CA $138,072
A-20080-33623 2020-08-28 certified SR QA SW ENGINEER, CA $146,000
A-19211-37522 2020-04-02 certified Staff Programming Analyst, NC $110,323
A-19213-38944 2020-03-11 certified Staff Software Systems Engineer, CA $164,674
A-19206-35745 2020-03-11 certified Sr. Software Systems Engineer, CA $106,330
A-19218-40381 2020-02-27 certified Senior Systems Design Architecture Engineer, NC $116,522
A-19196-30950 2019-11-27 certified Senior Enterprise Architect, CA $139,277
A-19100-91351 2019-11-08 certified Senior SW Systems Engineer, CA $158,000
A-19162-16916 2019-10-17 certified Senior Software Systems Engineer, NC $89,898
A-19116-98199 2019-09-24 certified Sr. Wireless Software Engineer, CA $135,000

Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023

From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.

Country of citizenship

  • India 46
  • Ireland 1
  • Italy 1
  • South Korea 1
  • Sweden 1

Worker's education

  • Master's 26
  • Bachelor's 19
  • None 2
  • Associate's 1
  • Doctorate 1
  • Other 1

Visa held when filed

  • H-1B 40
  • L-1 8
  • H-4 1

Schools

  • SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY 4
  • ANNA UNIVERSITY 2
  • KAKATIYA UNIVERSITY 2
  • NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY 2
  • UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI 2
  • ANNA UNIVERSITY CHENNAI 1

Fields of study

  • COMPUTER ENGINEERING 12
  • ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 7
  • ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 7
  • COMPUTER SCIENCE 4
  • COMPUTER APPLICATIONS 2
  • INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2

Notes on these numbers

What this rank counts, and what it doesn't

DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The 7 entries below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #3,737 counts this page's cases only.

11 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.

What these numbers don't say

5 notes
The wage is the job, not the payer
Their filings are led by Software Developers, 4 of 12. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
Volume doesn’t change the wait
DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 12 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
The name is a legal entity
DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 3,737. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
A median over 12 decided cases
The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
Two sources, and they do not add up
The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is NC. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.

The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built

Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load

Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 23, 2026 · daily

What each source includes

Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.

Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.

Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.

Cite this page