Updated
PERM sponsor, #70 of 70,985 by filings
AT&T SERVICES, INC.
AT&T SERVICES, INC. sponsors green cards: it filed 269 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on October 8, 2026. AT&T SERVICES, INC. has 196 PERM cases waiting with DOL.
- Main job
- Software Developers · 43% of its filings
- Main worksite
- Dallas, TX · 64% of its filings
- Industry
- Satellite Telecommunications · NAICS 517410
Waiting on a case with AT&T SERVICES, INC.?
- When it'll likely be decided
- An email when DOL moves it
Filings
489
#70 of 70,985
Certified
486
1 denied
Approval
99.8%
field 96.8%
Median wage
$147,659
offered, per year
Median days
471
5 slower than the field
Right now
DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.
Waiting on a decision
196
of 759 tracked cases. The other 563 have been decided.
The oldest one still waiting was filed January 5, 2026, 9 months ago.
Where those 196 are standing
- ANALYST REVIEW
- 196100%
A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.
None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.
Follow AT&T SERVICES, INC.
An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.
What DOL has done to its cases as a group
- September 30 DOL certified 15 of its cases
Its newest filings
Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.
- G-100-26281-287754 Senior Tech Product Manager filed 2026-10-08 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26280-284863 Lead Software Engineering filed 2026-10-07 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26280-285452 Lead Member of Technical Staff filed 2026-10-07 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26279-282848 Senior Software Engineering filed 2026-10-06 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26279-282874 Lead Software Engineering filed 2026-10-06 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26279-282920 Senior Data/AI Engineering filed 2026-10-06 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26279-282963 Lead Software Engineering filed 2026-10-06 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26279-283645 Lead Cybersecurity filed 2026-10-06 · ANALYST REVIEW
The 8 newest. Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
How long it takes
How long their cases are taking
- 292 days
AT&T SERVICES, INC.
median of 68 decisions in the last 90 days
- 302 days
Every employer
median of 28,615 decisions in the same 90 days
About the same as everyone: DOL works one national line in filing order. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.
Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 81,062 cases, and would be decided around March 16, 2027 (between February 24, 2027 and April 25, 2027). Estimate another date
Every program
Across DOL's programs
The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.
- PERM (green card)
- 489 published
- 196 pending
- $147,659 median, n=489
- Prevailing wage requests
- 740 published
- 33 pending
- $139,464 median, n=738
- H-1B labor condition applications
- 2,731 published
- 6 pending
- $155,000 median, n=2,727
Its median H-1B wage is $155,000 across 2,727 LCAs, 5.0% higher than its median PERM wage of $147,659 across 489 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.
Every case across these programs is in the search.
How these are counted
Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name, read under the 4 spellings DOL's files use for it; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.
Its newest wage requests and LCAs
Filed by AT&T SERVICES, INC., newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.
Wage requests
- P-100-26288-303590 Technology Lead 2026-10-15 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26288-302805 Lead System Engineering 2026-10-15 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26287-300586 Principal Tech Product Manager 2026-10-14 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26286-296989 Technology Lead 2026-10-13 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26280-285705 Lead Software Engineering 2026-10-07 · IN PROCESS
H-1B LCAs
- I-200-26288-302923 PRINCIPAL SYSTEM ENGINEERING 2026-10-15 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26288-302246 Lead Cybersecurity 2026-10-15 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26286-297248 PRINCIPAL DATA ANALYSIS 2026-10-13 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26286-297213 SENIOR TECH PRODUCT MGR. 2026-10-13 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26286-297183 LEAD DATA/ AI ENGINEERING 2026-10-13 · IN PROCESS
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
What its H-1B LCAs were for
From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 2,731 LCAs filed by AT&T SERVICES, INC., 2,679 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.
New hires and transfers
257 positions for new employment, 1,137 moving here from another employer.
- New employment 7a 257 · 10%
- Change of employer 7e 1,137 · 42%
- Continuing 7b 711 · 27%
- Change in previous employment 7c 370 · 14%
- Concurrent employment 7d 1 · 1%
- Amended petition 7f 205 · 8%
Shares of the 2,679 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.
What each box on the form means
- New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
- Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
- Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
- Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
- Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
- Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.
Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.
Wage level it chose
- Level I 64 · 3%
- Level II 426 · 17%
- Level III 267 · 11%
- Level IV 1,708 · 69%
Shares of the 2,465 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 214 of 2,679 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.
What it declared on Section H
- H-1B-dependent
- No
- Found a willful violator
- No
As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 23, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 2,609 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 2,726. Both are the employer's own answers.
What the two answers mean
H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.
Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.
Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR
Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 2,726 · E-3 (Australia) 5. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.
Against other sponsors
Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.
How it compares with other sponsors
Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.
PERM approval rate
99.8% of 487 decided PERM cases
Higher than 33% of the 1,343 sponsors with 30 or more decided cases.
PERM filings in the last 12 months
269 filed in the last 12 months
At the top of the 13,946 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.
H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months
917 certified in the last 24 months
At the top of the 27,903 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.
Share of H-1B positions that were transfers
30% of 1,113 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 83% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.
Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV
74% of 992 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 88% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.
USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years
99.5% of 1,282 USCIS decisions
Higher than 59% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.
Approval rate
99.8%ahead of 33%
Median days to decision
471 daysahead of 42%
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Against the sponsors ranked nearest
The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 273 and 2,299 filings.
- Their median wait
- 462 days
- This one
- 471 days
This one sits 9 days behind them.
Why no approval rate
A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.
Where this sits in the ranking
Ranked 70 of 70,985 by volume: 69 filed at least as many filings, and 70,915 filed no more.
- Just above
- CGI Technologies and Solutions Inc. 491 filings
- Just below
- PRESTIGIOUS PLACEMENT, INC 487 filings
Sponsors filing at the same rate
Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.
- #69 CGI Technologies and Solutions Inc. 491 filings · 6 denied
- #71 PRESTIGIOUS PLACEMENT, INC 487 filings · 1 denied
- #68 eBay Inc. 502 filings · 2 denied
- #72 HCL America, Inc. 478 filings · 9 denied
- #67 U.S. Bank National Association 513 filings · none denied
- #73 DoorDash, Inc. 472 filings · 41 denied
Sponsors hiring for the same work
The employers filing the most PERM cases for Software Developers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.
What they file, and where
A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.
What the jobs are
SOC 15-1252.00 · 211 filings, 43% of everything they file · 99.5% approved
- Computer Systems Analysts 15-1211.0063
- Data Scientists 15-2051.0028
- Project Management Specialists 13-1082.0027
- Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers 15-1253.0023
- Computer Network Architects 15-1241.0020
How this is counted
These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 372 of 489 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.
The industry they declared
Satellite Telecommunications
NAICS 517410, 51741 · 471 filings
- Telecommunications (Census group 517) 51721018
How this is counted
The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.
Where the jobs are
- Texas 391
- Washington 35
- New Jersey 30
- Georgia 23
- California 3
- Florida 3
How this is counted
The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 6 states cover 485 of 489 filings.
Where the work is
- Dallas, TX 315
- Plano, TX 71
- Middletown, NJ 26
- Alpharetta, GA 18
- Bothell, WA 17
- Redmond, WA 17
How this is counted
The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 6 cities cover 464 of 489 filings.
Who files for them
- FRAGOMEN, DEL REY, BERNSEN & LOEWY, LLP 487 filings · 99.8% approved
- FRAFRAGOMEN, DEL REY, BERNSEN LOEWY, LLPGOMEN, DEL REY, BERNSEN LOEWY, LLP 1 filings
How this is counted
The law firm named on the application. 488 of 489 filings, 100% of the total.
Newspapers it advertised in
- 334 cases
The Dallas Morning News
- 27 cases
The Seattle Times
- 17 cases
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
- 11 cases
Newark Star Ledger
- 11 cases
The Star-Ledger
- 2 cases
Austin American-Statesman
How this is counted
The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.
Additional steps it used
- 415 cases
The employer's website
- 415 cases
Job search websites
- 415 cases
Local or ethnic newspapers
How this is counted
The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.
How long before filing it began
- 0.0%
Under 30 days
- 0.0%
30 to 59 days
- 1.0%
60 to 89 days
- 6.5%
90 to 119 days
- 10%
120 to 149 days
- 82%
150 to 180 days
- 0.0%
Over 180 days
How this is counted
Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.
History
Year by year since 2011
732 PERM decisions from FY2011 to FY2026, busiest in FY2026 with 200.
- certified
- denied
- withdrawn
Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.
Every year as a table
| Fiscal year | Certified | Denied | Withdrawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2011 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| FY2012 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2013 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2014 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| FY2015 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2016 | 48 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2017 | 46 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2018 | 80 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2019 | 39 | 1 | 0 |
| FY2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2023 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2024 | 119 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2025 | 168 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2026 | 199 | 1 | 0 |
Decided in FY2016 to FY2023
The 25 most recent of 216. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.
| Case | Decided | Outcome | Job | Offered wage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-19050-74497 | 2019-09-30 | certified | Associate Director - Software Engineering, CA | $184,710 |
| A-18312-39095 | 2019-09-20 | certified | EG-Sr Software Engineer, CA | $110,000 |
| A-19175-22345 | 2019-08-16 | certified | Member of Technical Staff, NJ | $109,710 |
| A-18173-89977 | 2019-08-15 | certified | Lead Accountant, TX | $98,613 |
| A-18225-07107 | 2019-07-26 | certified | Principal Member of Tech Staff, NJ | $138,861 |
| A-18312-39028 | 2019-07-25 | certified | EG – Principal Architect, CA | $149,500 |
| A-18173-89792 | 2019-07-17 | certified | Professional System Engineer, GA | $121,139 |
| A-19116-98142 | 2019-07-02 | certified | Senior Member of Technical Staff, CA | $154,878 |
The other 17
| A-18226-07519 | 2019-07-01 | certified | EG-Senior Software Engineer II, CA | $130,000 |
| A-18219-05295 | 2019-06-24 | certified | EG - Principal Software Engineer, CA | $140,000 |
| A-18347-52286 | 2019-06-07 | certified | Associate Director-Technology, WA | $191,033 |
| A-18338-48103 | 2019-05-13 | certified | Senior Software Engineer, CA | $106,747 |
| A-17289-99267 | 2019-04-23 | certified | Senior Member of Technical Staff, WA | $120,000 |
| A-18226-07394 | 2019-04-19 | certified | Senior-Big Data Software Engineer, TX | $130,000 |
| A-17334-15811 | 2019-03-29 | certified | Principal Member of Technical Staff, WA | $136,000 |
| A-18339-48508 | 2019-03-25 | certified | Area Manager MTS (Associate Director Technology), TX | $183,227 |
| A-17285-98000 | 2019-03-22 | certified | Senior Member of Technical Staff, CA | $117,471 |
| A-18030-37396 | 2019-03-19 | certified | EG-SR Software Engineer, CA | $142,710 |
| A-18130-73804 | 2019-03-12 | certified | Area Manager- Member of Technical Staff, WA | $138,438 |
| A-18089-57919 | 2019-03-12 | certified | Professional Data Scientist, GA | $109,738 |
| A-18140-77469 | 2019-03-11 | certified | Director Product Management, CA | $175,000 |
| A-18031-37969 | 2019-02-04 | certified | Senior Specialist - App/Prod Support, CO | $101,906 |
| A-17285-97949 | 2019-01-31 | certified | Senior Member of Technical Staff, TX | $93,099 |
| A-18008-28715 | 2019-01-30 | certified | Sr Specialist-Database Administration, TX | $130,000 |
| A-17333-15377 | 2019-01-25 | certified | Senior App/Prod Support, MI | $125,000 |
Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023
From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.
Country of citizenship
- India 164
- China 12
- Canada 11
- Mexico 8
- Nepal 3
- South Korea 3
Worker's education
- Master's 132
- Bachelor's 71
- Doctorate 12
- Other 1
Visa held when filed
- H-1B 196
- TN 10
- PAROLEE 3
- F-1 2
- L-1 1
- NOT IN USA 1
Schools
- CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH 6
- ANNA UNIVERSITY 5
- JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 5
- THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON 5
- BHARATHIAR UNIVERSITY 4
- BHARATHIDASAN UNIVERSITY 4
Fields of study
- COMPUTER SCIENCE 44
- ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 35
- COMPUTER ENGINEERING 22
- ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 21
- COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS 12
- BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 8
Notes on these numbers
What this rank counts, and what it doesn't
DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. 1 other spelling of this name was folded into this page and its cases are counted here. Nothing else in the file starts the same way.
What these numbers don't say
5 notes
- The wage is the job, not the payer
- Their filings are led by Software Developers, 211 of 489. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
- Volume doesn’t change the wait
- DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 489 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
- The name is a legal entity
- DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 70. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
- A median over 487 decided cases
- The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
- Two sources, and they do not add up
- The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is TX. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built
Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load
Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 19, 2026 · daily
What each source includes
Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.
Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.
Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.