PERM Tracker
Live DOL data · Automatic deadlines
Skip to main content

Updated

PERM sponsor, #64,577 of 70,985 by filings

Applexus Technologies LLC

Waiting on a case with Applexus Technologies LLC?

  • When it'll likely be decided
  • An email when DOL moves it

It's on your ETA-9089 receipt. It goes into the page's address, so you can bookmark the result.

Don't have the number? Find it among their filings.

Or follow this employer by email

Too few cases for a rate

1 decided filing: too few for an approval rate.

Why

Across every PERM case DOL decided in this window, 3.20% were denied. At that rate a file this size comes back clean most of the time whatever the sponsor did, so a percentage would be a fact about how few cases there are. Telling a clean record apart from the field takes about 117 decided cases.

Filings

1

#64,577 of 70,985

Certified

1

0 denied

Approval

Not shown

withheld: 1 decided

Median wage

$140,000

offered, per year

Median days

401

middle of 1 decided

Right now

DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.

Follow Applexus Technologies LLC

An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.

Fewer than five of its PERM cases are pending as of October 21, 2026, and the census that draws this bar starts at five.

What DOL has done to its cases as a group

Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.

You confirm by email first. One click turns it off.

How long it takes

How long their cases are taking

  1. Every employer

    median of 30,678 decisions in the same 90 days

    301 days

None of their cases were decided in the last 90 days, too few for a median of their own. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.

Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 79,922 cases, and would be decided around March 18, 2027 (between February 26, 2027 and April 27, 2027). Estimate another date

Every program

Across DOL's programs

The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.

PERM (green card)
1 published
no live read
1 wage, under the floor
Prevailing wage requests
1 published
3 pending
1 wage, under the floor
H-1B labor condition applications
91 published
0 pending
$145,000 median, n=91

Every case across these programs is in the search.

How these are counted

Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name, read under the 2 spellings DOL's files use for it; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.

Its newest wage requests and LCAs

Filed by Applexus Technologies LLC, newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.

Wage requests

All wage requests by this employer

H-1B LCAs

All H-1B LCAs by this employer

Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.

What its H-1B LCAs were for

From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 91 LCAs filed by Applexus Technologies LLC, 87 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.

New hires and transfers

0 positions for new employment, 38 moving here from another employer.

  • New employment 7a 0 · 0%
  • Change of employer 7e 38 · 44%
  • Continuing 7b 14 · 16%
  • Change in previous employment 7c 4 · 5%
  • Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
  • Amended petition 7f 31 · 36%

Shares of the 87 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.

What each box on the form means
  • New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
  • Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
  • Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
  • Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
  • Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
  • Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.

Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.

Wage level it chose

  • Level I 6 · 7%
  • Level II 26 · 32%
  • Level III 36 · 44%
  • Level IV 14 · 17%

Shares of the 82 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 5 of 87 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.

What it declared on Section H

H-1B-dependent
Yes
Found a willful violator
No

As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 2, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 76 of 79 LCAs, and a willful violator on 1 of 89. Both are the employer's own answers.

What the two answers mean

H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.

Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.

Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR

Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 89 · E-3 (Australia) 2. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.

Against other sponsors

Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.

Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.

  • H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months

    25 certified in the last 24 months

    Higher than 86% of the 27,902 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.

  • Share of H-1B positions that were transfers

    46% of 28 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 95% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.

  • Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV

    43% of 28 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026

    Higher than 59% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.

  • USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years

    95.7% of 23 USCIS decisions

    Higher than 18% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.

Also on its record

  • Its newest LCA that answered declared it H-1B dependent (decided 2026-06-09).
  • It declared itself a willful violator on 1 LCA.
Position in the field 1,343 sponsors with 30+ decided

Approval rate

not shownunder 30 decided

0% 100%

Median days to decision

401 daysmiddle of 1 decided, too few to rank

5d 1152d
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. Sponsors with fewer than 30 decided cases are left out of the population rather than plotted, because a rate over a handful of cases lands wherever the handful landed. This sponsor has 1 decided cases, so its median days is marked but left unranked, and no approval rate is drawn at all.
DOL PERM disclosure files

Against the sponsors ranked nearest

The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed 1 filings each.

Their median wait
401 days
This one
401 days

Exactly where this one sits.

Why no approval rate

A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.

Where this sits in the ranking

Ranked 64,577 of 70,985 by volume: 64,576 filed at least as many filings, and 6,408 filed no more.

Just above
Solomo Inc 1 filings
Just below
Chesterfield County Government 1 filings

Sponsors filing at the same rate

Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.

History

Year by year since 2010

74 PERM decisions from FY2010 to FY2024, busiest in FY2016 with 22.

  • certified
  • denied
  • withdrawn

Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2024 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.

Every year as a table
Fiscal year Certified Denied Withdrawn
FY2010 4 0 0
FY2011 0 0 0
FY2012 5 0 0
FY2013 1 0 0
FY2014 7 0 0
FY2015 16 0 0
FY2016 22 0 0
FY2017 9 0 0
FY2018 3 0 0
FY2019 5 0 0
FY2020 0 0 0
FY2021 0 0 0
FY2022 1 0 0
FY2023 0 0 0
FY2024 1 0 0

Decided in FY2016 to FY2023

The 25 most recent of 40. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.

Case Decided Outcome Job Offered wage
A-21322-75077 2022-08-17 certified Software Application Developer, WA $119,350
A-18338-47948 2019-04-17 certified Software Applications Developer, WA $117,988
A-18338-47841 2019-04-04 certified Software Applications Developer, WA $117,988
A-18347-51956 2019-03-28 certified Software Applications Developer, WA $112,549
A-18338-47826 2019-03-26 certified Software Applications Developer, WA $117,988
A-18337-47277 2019-03-26 certified Software Applications Developer, WA $112,549
A-17212-70230 2018-01-31 certified SOFTWARE DEVELOPER, WA $122,533
A-17214-71134 2017-12-12 certified SOFTWARE DEVELOPER, WA $122,533
The other 17
A-17048-04565 2017-10-23 certified PROGRAMMER ANALYST, WA $106,101
A-17097-22153 2017-09-20 certified SOFTWARE DEVELOPER, WA $122,533
A-17117-31119 2017-09-20 certified SOFTWARE DEVELOPER, WA $122,533
A-17097-22166 2017-07-05 certified SOFTWARE ENGINEER, WA $122,533
A-17097-22188 2017-06-27 certified SOFTWARE DEVELOPER, WA $122,533
A-17048-04343 2017-04-19 certified PROGRAMMER ANALYST, WA $106,101
A-16281-59912 2017-01-04 certified BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST, WA $118,706
A-16286-61084 2016-12-22 certified BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST, WA $118,706
A-16264-54413 2016-12-13 certified BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST, WA $118,706
A-16221-40051 2016-11-08 certified BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST, WA $118,706
A-16179-26370 2016-09-27 certified BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST, WA $118,706
A-16176-25601 2016-09-19 certified BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST, WA $118,706
A-16008-58821 2016-05-24 certified SOFTWARE ENGINEER, WA $128,773
A-16008-58877 2016-05-20 certified SOFTWARE ENGINEER, WA $128,773
A-15352-52658 2016-04-29 certified SOFTWARE ENGINEER, WA $128,773
A-15276-24787 2016-03-21 certified SOFTWARE ENGINEER, WA $128,773
A-15274-24233 2016-03-21 certified SOFTWARE ENGINEER, WA $128,773

Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023

From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.

Country of citizenship

  • India 39
  • Singapore 1

Worker's education

  • Bachelor's 27
  • Master's 13

Visa held when filed

  • H-1B 39
  • L-1 1

Schools

  • ANNA UNIVERSITY 4
  • MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY 4
  • COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 3
  • JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 3
  • UNIVERSITY OF KERALA 3
  • BANGALORE UNIVERSITY 2

Fields of study

  • TECHNOLOGY 13
  • ENGINEERING 9
  • SCIENCE 6
  • BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 4
  • COMPUTER APPLICATIONS 2
  • INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2

Notes on these numbers

What these numbers don't say

5 notes
The wage is the job, not the payer
The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
Volume doesn’t change the wait
DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 1 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
The name is a legal entity
DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 64,577. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
A median over 1 decided cases
That’s a middle of a handful, and it moves entirely with which months those few cases were filed in.
Two sources, and they do not add up
The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.

The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built

Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load

What each source includes

Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.

Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.

Cite this page