Updated
PERM sponsor, #402 of 70,985 by filings
Align Technology, Inc.
Align Technology, Inc. sponsors green cards: it filed 15 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on October 7, 2026. Align Technology, Inc. has 7 PERM cases waiting with DOL.
- Main job
- Software Developers · 34% of its filings
- Main worksite
- Morrisville, NC · 55% of its filings
- Industry
- Dental Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing · NAICS 339114
Waiting on a case with Align Technology, Inc.?
- When it'll likely be decided
- An email when DOL moves it
This rate is level with the field
Over 85 decided filings, this rate can't be told apart from the field in either direction.
Why
The 95% interval runs up to a 6.4% denial rate, which still covers the 3.20% the field as a whole records.
Filings
91
#402 of 70,985
Certified
84
1 denied
Approval
98.8%
field 96.8%
Median wage
$156,000
offered, per year
Median days
466
at the field median
Right now
DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.
Waiting on a decision
7
of 109 tracked cases. The other 102 have been decided.
The oldest one still waiting was filed January 21, 2026, 8 months ago.
Where those 7 are standing
- ANALYST REVIEW
- 7100%
A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.
None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.
Follow Align Technology, Inc.
An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.
What DOL has done to its cases as a group
Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.
Its newest filings
Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.
- G-100-26280-286498 Sr. Manager, iOS Apps filed 2026-10-07 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26201-110978 Project Manager filed 2026-07-20 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26099-776694 Sr. Business Systems Analyst filed 2026-04-09 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26099-776153 SAP Systems Engineer - Technical filed 2026-04-09 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26030-607540 Associate Data Management Developer filed 2026-01-30 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26021-576252 Data Reporting Analyst filed 2026-01-21 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26021-575900 Sr. Software Development Engineer in Test filed 2026-01-21 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-25344-472958 Mechanical Design Engineer filed 2025-12-10 · CERTIFIED
The 8 newest. Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
How long it takes
How long their cases are taking
- 303 days
Align Technology, Inc.
median of 6 decisions in the last 90 days
- 302 days
Every employer
median of 30,289 decisions in the same 90 days
About the same as everyone: DOL works one national line in filing order. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.
Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 80,222 cases, and would be decided around March 18, 2027 (between February 26, 2027 and April 27, 2027). Estimate another date
Every program
Across DOL's programs
The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.
- PERM (green card)
- 91 published
- 7 pending
- $156,000 median, n=91
- Prevailing wage requests
- 131 published
- 4 pending
- $132,080 median, n=119
- H-1B labor condition applications
- 387 published
- 1 pending
- $149,726 median, n=387
Its median H-1B wage is $149,726 across 387 LCAs, 4.0% lower than its median PERM wage of $156,000 across 91 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.
Every case across these programs is in the search.
How these are counted
Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name, read under the 2 spellings DOL's files use for it; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.
Its newest wage requests and LCAs
Filed by Align Technology, Inc., newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.
Wage requests
- P-100-26232-182363 Expert Systems Analyst, SAP Order to Ship 2026-08-20 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26215-143044 Sr. Software Quality Engineer I 2026-08-03 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26191-092941 Sr. Program Manager 2026-07-10 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26191-092073 Compensation Intelligence Analyst 2026-07-10 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
- P-100-26190-089735 Senior Test Software Development Engineer (SDET) 2026-07-09 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
H-1B LCAs
- I-200-26293-311177 Sr. Product & Engineering Analyst, Product Innovation 2026-10-20 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26282-290966 Financial Analyst, Americas 2026-10-09 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-26275-277311 Sr. Analyst – SAP OTC 2026-10-02 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-26272-268595 Sr. Mgr. Customer Identity & Integration Platform 2026-09-29 · CERTIFIED
- I-200-26252-224077 Sr. Manager, Technical Commercial Applications 2026-09-09 · CERTIFIED
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
What its H-1B LCAs were for
From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 387 LCAs filed by Align Technology, Inc., 383 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.
New hires and transfers
109 positions for new employment, 92 moving here from another employer.
- New employment 7a 109 · 28%
- Change of employer 7e 92 · 24%
- Continuing 7b 126 · 33%
- Change in previous employment 7c 15 · 4%
- Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
- Amended petition 7f 41 · 11%
Shares of the 383 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.
What each box on the form means
- New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
- Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
- Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
- Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
- Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
- Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.
Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.
Wage level it chose
- Level I 13 · 5%
- Level II 62 · 25%
- Level III 104 · 42%
- Level IV 69 · 28%
Shares of the 248 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 135 of 383 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.
What it declared on Section H
- H-1B-dependent
- No
- Found a willful violator
- No
As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 5, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 357 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 381. Both are the employer's own answers.
What the two answers mean
H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.
Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.
Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR
Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 381 · E-3 (Australia) 4 · H-1B1 (Singapore) 2. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.
Against other sponsors
Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.
How it compares with other sponsors
Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.
PERM approval rate
98.8% of 85 decided PERM cases
Higher than 25% of the 1,343 sponsors with 30 or more decided cases.
PERM filings in the last 12 months
15 filed in the last 12 months
Higher than 94% of the 13,997 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.
H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months
115 certified in the last 24 months
Higher than 97% of the 27,902 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.
Share of H-1B positions that were transfers
14% of 133 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 48% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.
Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV
73% of 95 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 87% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.
USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years
95.3% of 127 USCIS decisions
Higher than 16% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.
Approval rate
98.8%ahead of 25%
Median days to decision
466 daysahead of 48%
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Against the sponsors ranked nearest
The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 80 and 107 filings.
- Their median wait
- 470 days
- This one
- 466 days
This one sits 4 days ahead of them.
Why no approval rate
A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.
Where this sits in the ranking
Ranked 402 of 70,985 by volume: 401 filed at least as many filings, and 70,583 filed no more.
- Just above
- Zscaler, Inc. 91 filings
- Just below
- Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation 91 filings
Sponsors filing at the same rate
Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.
- #401 Zscaler, Inc. 91 filings · none denied
- #403 Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation 91 filings · none denied
- #400 Paycom Payroll, LLC 92 filings · none denied
- #404 Wolters Kluwer United States, Inc. 91 filings · none denied
- #399 Oak View Farms LLC 92 filings · none denied
- #405 BROADRIDGE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 91 filings · none denied
Sponsors hiring for the same work
The employers filing the most PERM cases for Software Developers, the occupation this sponsor files for most.
What they file, and where
A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.
What the jobs are
SOC 15-1252.00 · 31 filings, 34% of everything they file · 100.0% approved
- Computer Systems Analysts 15-1211.0013
- Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers 15-1253.0010
- Business Intelligence Analysts 15-2051.016
- Computer and Information Systems Managers 11-3021.004
- Data Scientists 15-2051.003
How this is counted
These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 67 of 91 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.
The industry they declared
Dental Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
NAICS 339114 · 83 filings
- Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing 339118
How this is counted
The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.
Where the jobs are
- North Carolina 50
- California 38
- Arizona 3
How this is counted
The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 3 states cover 91 of 91 filings.
Where the work is
- Morrisville, NC 50
- San Jose, CA 38
- Tempe, AZ 3
How this is counted
The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 3 cities cover 91 of 91 filings.
Who files for them
- Naya Law Group PC (dba Finnan, Fleischut & Assoc.) 59 filings · 98.1% approved
- Naya Law Group, PC 25 filings
- Naya Law Group PC dba Finnan, Fleischut Associates 7 filings
How this is counted
The law firm named on the application. 91 of 91 filings, 100% of the total.
Newspapers it advertised in
- 46 cases
The News & Observer
- 33 cases
The Mercury News- Bay Area News Grp
- 3 cases
The Arizona Republic
- 2 cases
The Mercury News
How this is counted
The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.
Additional steps it used
- 84 cases
Job search websites
- 84 cases
Local or ethnic newspapers
- 84 cases
Trade or professional organizations
How this is counted
The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.
How long before filing it began
- 0.0%
Under 30 days
- 0.0%
30 to 59 days
- 12%
60 to 89 days
- 40%
90 to 119 days
- 23%
120 to 149 days
- 25%
150 to 180 days
- 0.0%
Over 180 days
How this is counted
Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.
History
Year by year since 2009
202 PERM decisions from FY2009 to FY2026, busiest in FY2025 with 48.
- certified
- denied
- withdrawn
Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.
Every year as a table
| Fiscal year | Certified | Denied | Withdrawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2009 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2010 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2011 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2012 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2013 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2014 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2015 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2016 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2017 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2018 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2019 | 13 | 1 | 0 |
| FY2020 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2021 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2022 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2023 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| FY2024 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| FY2025 | 43 | 1 | 4 |
| FY2026 | 33 | 0 | 0 |
Decided in FY2016 to FY2023
The 25 most recent of 73. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.
| Case | Decided | Outcome | Job | Offered wage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-22297-44508 | 2023-09-21 | certified | Senior iOS Developer, NC | $141,003 |
| A-22307-51374 | 2023-05-23 | withdrawn | Software Development Engineer in Test, CA | $143,069 |
| A-23027-94045 | 2023-02-14 | withdrawn | Manager, Global Invisalign Experience, CA | $202,103 |
| A-22091-34491 | 2022-12-20 | withdrawn | R&D Engineer III, Simulation, CA | $110,000 |
| A-21313-70553 | 2022-11-03 | certified | 3D Software Research Engineer, CA | $130,000 |
| A-21313-70595 | 2022-10-06 | certified | R&D Engineer III, Emerging Technology, CA | $148,000 |
| A-21105-74668 | 2021-12-13 | certified | Senior Analyst, SAP OTC, CA | $145,000 |
| A-20311-18130 | 2021-11-03 | certified | Sr. SFDC Software Engineer, NC | $126,030 |
The other 17
| A-21022-44892 | 2021-10-07 | certified | Technical Manager, Professional Web and Mobile Applications, CA | $138,800 |
| A-20319-21221 | 2021-05-25 | certified | Sr. Financial Analyst, CA | $139,050 |
| A-20241-93419 | 2021-05-20 | certified | Sr. C++ Software Engineer, CA | $166,000 |
| A-20126-50789 | 2021-05-18 | certified | Sr. Systems Integration Automation Engineer, CA | $126,500 |
| A-20241-93443 | 2021-05-12 | certified | Regulatory Engineering Manager, CA | $125,000 |
| A-20126-50796 | 2021-03-17 | certified | Sr. Software Developer, Java Applications, CA | $154,670 |
| A-20157-62537 | 2021-02-22 | certified | Integration Application Engineer, NC | $98,500 |
| A-20126-50794 | 2021-02-04 | certified | IT Product Analyst, CA | $139,249 |
| A-20127-51204 | 2021-01-29 | certified | Manager, Mobile Applications, NC | $138,330 |
| A-20127-51118 | 2021-01-29 | certified | IAM and Integration Application Manager, NC | $130,000 |
| A-20106-43480 | 2021-01-29 | certified | Sr. Systems Integration Automation Engineer, CA | $126,500 |
| A-20057-23629 | 2020-06-29 | certified | Sr. Salesforce Analyst, NC | $110,500 |
| A-20027-11950 | 2020-06-08 | certified | Sr. 3D Research Engineer, CA | $154,670 |
| A-20027-11921 | 2020-05-26 | certified | Machine Learning Research Scientist, NC | $100,000 |
| A-20014-06616 | 2020-05-21 | certified | iOS Developer, Mobile Solutions, NC | $98,450 |
| A-19353-98079 | 2020-05-01 | certified | SQA Engineer, NC | $90,000 |
| A-19312-80950 | 2020-04-06 | certified | Integration Application Engineer, NC | $98,450 |
Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023
From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.
Country of citizenship
- India 45
- Russia 18
- Canada 3
- China 3
- Kazakhstan 1
- Mexico 1
Worker's education
- Master's 39
- Bachelor's 29
- Doctorate 3
- Other 2
Visa held when filed
- H-1B 54
- L-1 17
- H-4 1
- TN 1
Schools
- MOSCOW INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY 5
- BANGALORE UNIVERSITY 4
- ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY 3
- ANNA UNIVERSITY 3
- JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 3
- RUSSIAN STATE SOCIAL UNIVERSITY 2
Fields of study
- COMPUTER SCIENCE 8
- ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 6
- MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 5
- APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE 4
- APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS 3
- COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS 3
Notes on these numbers
What this rank counts, and what it doesn't
DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The entry below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #402 counts this page's cases only.
3 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.
What these numbers don't say
5 notes
- The wage is the job, not the payer
- Their filings are led by Software Developers, 31 of 91. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
- Volume doesn’t change the wait
- DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 91 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
- The name is a legal entity
- DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 402. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
- A median over 85 decided cases
- The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
- Two sources, and they do not add up
- The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is NC. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built
Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load
Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 21, 2026 · daily
What each source includes
Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.
Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.
Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.