PERM Tracker
Live DOL data · Automatic deadlines
Skip to main content

Updated

PERM law firm, #372 of 5,571 by cases

Wildes & Weinberg, PC

Biggest client
Crestron Electronics, Inc. · 7% of its cases
Main job
Financial and Investment Analysts · 9% of its cases
Filed from
New York · The address on its filings

Is Wildes & Weinberg, PC handling your case?

  • When it'll likely be decided
  • An email when DOL moves it

It's on your ETA-9089 receipt. It goes into the page's address, so you can bookmark the result.

Don't have the number? Find it among this firm's filings.

This rate is level with the field

Over 113 decided cases, this rate can't be told apart from the field in either direction.

Why

The 95% interval runs up to a 12.2% denial rate, which still covers the 3.20% the field as a whole records.

Cases

117

#372 of 5,571

Certified

106

7 denied

Approval

93.8%

field 96.8%

Median wage

$105,666

offered, per year

Median days

467

2 faster than the field

The practice

Who they file for, what the jobs are and where the work sits, from the employer, occupation and worksite on their own applications.

Who they file for

  1. Crestron Electronics, Inc. 8 filings
  2. Trexquant Investment LP 7 filings
  3. Numerix LLC 6 filings
  4. Edmunds.com, Inc. 4 filings
  5. Atentus LLC 3 filings
  6. Baumer of America, Inc. 3 filings
How this is counted

The employers named on the most applications from this firm. 31 of 117 filings, 26% of the total.

What the jobs are

Financial and Investment Analysts

SOC 13-2051.00 · 11 filings, 9% of everything they file

How this is counted

These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 42 of 117 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.

Where the jobs are

  • New York 47
  • New Jersey 19
  • Connecticut 10
  • California 9
  • Florida 9
  • Oklahoma 4
How this is counted

The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 6 states cover 98 of 117 filings.

Newspapers it advertised in

  1. The New York Times

    26 cases

  2. The Star-Ledger

    10 cases

  3. Stamford Advocate

    6 cases

  4. Los Angeles Times

    4 cases

  5. Chicago Tribune

    3 cases

  6. Miami Herald

    3 cases
How this is counted

The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.

Additional steps it used

  1. Job search websites

    79 cases

  2. Radio or TV ads

    75 cases

  3. Local or ethnic newspapers

    39 cases

  4. The employer's website

    31 cases

  5. Employee referral programs

    13 cases
How this is counted

The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.

How long before filing it began

  1. Under 30 days

    0.0%

  2. 30 to 59 days

    0.0%

  3. 60 to 89 days

    48%

  4. 90 to 119 days

    18%

  5. 120 to 149 days

    15%

  6. 150 to 180 days

    18%

  7. Over 180 days

    1.1%
How this is counted

Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.

Where every PERM employer recruits

Every program

Beyond PERM: its other work for clients

DOL names the law firm or agent on each H-1B labor condition application, prevailing wage request and H-2A, H-2B and CW-1 application it publishes. These are the ones that name Wildes & Weinberg, PC, under 4 spellings of its name.

H-1B LCAs

1,243 LCAs filed for clients, 94% certified

Decided from October 2019 to June 2026.

The employers it filed the most for

  1. Crestron Electronics, Inc. 73
  2. NUMERIX LLC 70
  3. Trexquant Investment LP 68
  4. NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED 58
  5. Agency Within LLC 42
  6. FRIEDMAN LLP 41
  7. LACTALIS AMERICAN GROUP, INC. 39
  8. Yeshiva University 36

Prevailing wage requests

189 wage requests

Decided from October 2023 to June 2026.

The employers it filed the most for

  1. Crestron Electronics, Inc. 14
  2. Trexquant Investment LP 10
  3. Numerix LLC 9
  4. DARCARS of Rockville, Inc. 7
  5. Edmunds.com, Inc. 5
  6. Arthur Kill Operating Services LLC 5
  7. TR Apparel LLC 4
  8. RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC 4

Against other firms

Where it sits among 5,571 firms. The full ranking sorts every column.

Position in the field 1,124 firms with 30+ decided

Approval rate

93.8%ahead of 17%

0% 100%

Median days to decision

467 daysahead of 52%

361d 1059d
Each bar counts firms at that value. More
Each bar counts firms at that value. Firms with fewer than 30 decided cases are left out of the population rather than plotted, because a rate over a handful of cases lands wherever the handful landed. The line marks this one. Approval rates pile up against 100%, so read the ties in the label rather than the position of the line.
DOL PERM disclosure files

Against the firms ranked nearest

The 120 firms ranked nearest filed between 101 and 143 cases.

Their median wait
472 days
This one
467 days

This one sits 5 days ahead of them.

Why no approval rate

A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.

Where this sits in the ranking

Ranked 372 of 5,571 by volume: 371 filed at least as many cases, and 5,199 filed no more.

Just above
Fraser Stryker PC LLO 117 cases
Just below
Law Offices of Nadadur S. Kumar 117 cases

Other New York firms at this volume

Practices filing from New York at a similar rate, taken from the ranks nearest this one. More

Practices filing from New York at a similar rate, taken from the ranks nearest this one. State is the address on the filing, so a national firm appears under whichever office signed the form.

For the firm

Work at Wildes & Weinberg, PC? Claim this page

Add the firm's website, a short description, languages, offices and what it handles. Once we've read it, it shows on this page apart from DOL's figures, marked as the firm's own words. A verified firm also gets a badge for its own site that links here.

What the firm handles

Free. An address at a domain DOL's own filings list for this firm is confirmed by the link alone; any other address is checked by a person first. What you send shows here as the firm's own words once we've read it, and we can take it down.

Already claimed it?

Running the practice?

The free tracker carries the deadlines on every case, from the wage request to the I-140.

Notes on these numbers

What this rank counts, and what it doesn't

DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one firm can appear under several. 1 other spelling of this name was folded into this page and its cases are counted here. Nothing else in the file starts the same way.

What these numbers don't say

5 notes
The wage is the job, not the payer
Their filings are led by Financial and Investment Analysts, 11 of 117. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles their clients file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
Nothing here is waiting
All 117 of the cases on this page carry a decision date, because every row in DOL's disclosure files does, so a case still in the queue is in none of these counts. The live tracker that does see pending cases records the employer on each one and not the firm, so a firm's current queue cannot be broken out at all. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
The approval rate barely separates firms
This firm is at 93.8%. Across every firm with enough decided cases to carry a rate the median is above 99%, and hundreds have no denials at all. Placing near the top of that axis mostly means being level with the rest of it.
None of this measures the advice
It measures filings that DOL approved or denied. Whether the case was worth filing, what it cost, and how the firm handled an audit aren’t in these files.
A median over 113 decided cases
DOL works one national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so this says when the firm's cases were filed at least as much as anything about the firm. Where the queue stands today is on the processing times page.

The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built

Filings newer than DOL's last published file can't be attributed to this firm until DOL publishes them. The live list on the case search page carries them by employer.

Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load

LCA disclosures: DOL quarterly LCA disclosure files (www.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

Wage determinations: DOL quarterly PW disclosure files (www.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

What each source includes

Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.

Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.

LCA disclosures: Certified and denied H-1B labor condition applications only, with the wage offered.

Wage determinations: Decided prevailing wage requests only, with the wage DOL determined. Pending requests are absent.

Cite this page