All firms · #1,082 of 5,678 by volume
PALMER REY PLLC
33 PERM cases in DOL's current disclosure window, 29 certified and 1 denied. Filed from Michigan. Firm name as filed.
This rate is level with the field
Computed over 30 decided cases. The 95% interval runs up to a 16.7% denial rate, which still covers the 3.20% the field as a whole records, so this record can't be told apart from the field in either direction.
Cases
33
#1,082 of 5,678
Certified
29
1 denied
Approval
96.7%
field 96.8%
Median wage
—
not on file
Median days
453
16 faster than the field
Approval rate
96.7%ahead of 30%
Median days to decision
453 daysahead of 75%
The practice, in their own filings
Who they file for, what the jobs are, and where the work sits. All of it is the employer, occupation and worksite named on their own applications.
Who they file for
- JET BRIDGE LLC 4 filings
- A. J. Boggs & Company 2 filings
- GMT LOGISTIC INC. 2 filings
- MOE & LUBZ LLC 2 filings
- MUNRO ASSOCIATES, INC. 2 filings
- SCORPION IRRIGATION LLC 2 filings
The employers named on the most applications from this firm. 14 of 33 filings, 42% of the total.
What the jobs are
SOC 15-1252.00 · 7 filings, 21% of everything they file
- Nannies 39-9011.013
- Computer Systems Analysts 15-1211.002
- General and Operations Managers 11-1021.002
- Heavy and Tractor-Trailer Truck Drivers 53-3032.002
- PARALEGAL 23-20112
These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 18 of 33 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.
Where the jobs are
- Michigan 26
- California 5
- Kansas 1
- Missouri 1
The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. These 4 states cover 33 of 33 filings.
Against the firms ranked nearest
The 120 firms ranked nearest this one filed between 30 and 36 cases. Their median wait is 470 days, and this one sits 17 days ahead of that. No approval rate is given for the band. A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.
Where this sits in the ranking
Ranked 1,082 of 5,678 by volume: 1,081 filed at least as many cases, and 4,596 filed no more.
- Just above
- Yang & Associates LLP 33 cases
- Just below
- Law Offices of Hsyung & Associates 33 cases
Other Michigan firms at this volume
Practices filing from Michigan at a similar rate, taken from the ranks nearest this one. State is the address on the filing, so a national firm appears under whichever office signed the form.
- #1,119 · MI Rona M. Lum, P.C. 31 cases · none denied
- #1,185 · MI Hilf & Hilf PLC 29 cases · none denied
- #973 · MI VisaLawyer PLLC 39 cases · none denied
- #1,258 · MI Butzel Long 26 cases · none denied
- #904 · MI Warner Norcross + Judd LLP 44 cases · none denied
- #1,280 · MI AKHTAR AND CHAVEZ, PLC 25 cases · 2 denied
What this rank counts, and what it doesn't
DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one firm can appear under several. The 2 entries below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same firm; some are a different one. Rank #1,082 counts this page's cases only.
55 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.
What these numbers don't say
- The wage is the job, not the payer
- The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles their clients file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
- Nothing here is waiting
- Every row in DOL's disclosure files carries a decision date, so a case still in the queue is in none of these counts. The live tracker that does see pending cases records the employer on each one and not the firm, so a firm's current queue cannot be broken out at all. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
- The approval rate barely separates firms
- Across every firm with enough decided cases to carry a rate the median is above 99%, and hundreds have no denials at all. Placing near the top of that axis mostly means being level with the rest of it.
- None of this measures the advice
- It measures filings that DOL approved or denied. Whether the case was worth filing, what it cost, and how the firm handled an audit aren’t in these files.
- A median over 30 decided cases
- DOL works one national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so this says when the firm's cases were filed at least as much as anything about the firm. Where the queue stands today is on the processing times page.
The window these figures cover
DOL's FY2026 Q3 and FY2025 Q4 and New Form FY2024 Q4 and FY2024 Q4 PERM disclosure files, unioned and de-duplicated by case number: 373,939 cases. Every case in them carries a decision, so nothing here counts what’s still pending. How each figure is built, and what it can and can't answer, is set out in the methodology.
They're handling your case?
The decision estimator reads your filing month against where DOL is now.
Running the practice?
The full ranking sorts every column, and the free tracker carries the deadlines on every case.
Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Employers and firms: Derived from the disclosure corpus · data through Aug 26, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly ingest