Updated
PERM sponsor, #260 of 70,985 by filings
Persistent Systems Inc.
Persistent Systems Inc. sponsors green cards: it filed 31 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on September 29, 2026. Persistent Systems Inc. has 29 PERM cases waiting with DOL.
- Main job
- Computer Systems Analysts · 46% of its filings
- Main worksite
- Santa Clara, CA · 96% of its filings
- Industry
- Computer Systems Design Services · NAICS 541512
Waiting on a case with Persistent Systems Inc.?
- When it'll likely be decided
- An email when DOL moves it
Filings
145
#260 of 70,985
Certified
128
12 denied
Approval
91.4%
field 96.8%
Median wage
$133,432
offered, per year
Median days
491
25 slower than the field
Right now
DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.
Waiting on a decision
29
of 173 tracked cases. The other 144 have been decided.
The oldest one still waiting was filed March 10, 2025, 19 months ago.
Where those 29 are standing
- ANALYST REVIEW
- 2897%
A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.
- RECONSIDERATION APPEALS
- 13%
The employer has asked the same officer who denied the case to look at it again, within 30 days of the denial. The request can only use documents DOL already had, so new evidence can't be added to fix what the denial was based on.
None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.
Follow Persistent Systems Inc.
An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.
What DOL has done to its cases as a group
Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.
Its newest filings
Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.
- G-100-26272-268928 Solution Architect filed 2026-09-29 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26271-265886 Associate Vice President - Sales filed 2026-09-28 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26271-266024 Software Quality Assurance Engineer filed 2026-09-28 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26267-259844 Software Developer filed 2026-09-24 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26267-259951 Software Developer filed 2026-09-24 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26267-260009 Software Developer filed 2026-09-24 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26265-253062 Research Analyst-Operations filed 2026-09-22 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26264-248330 Software Quality Assurance Engineer filed 2026-09-21 · ANALYST REVIEW
The 8 newest. Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
How long it takes
How long their cases are taking
- 302 days
Every employer
median of 29,263 decisions in the same 90 days
Only 4 of their cases were decided in the last 90 days, too few for a median of their own. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.
Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 80,773 cases, and would be decided around March 16, 2027 (between February 24, 2027 and April 25, 2027). Estimate another date
Every program
Across DOL's programs
The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.
- PERM (green card)
- 145 published
- 29 pending
- $133,432 median, n=145
- Prevailing wage requests
- 183 published
- 32 pending
- $161,179 median, n=177
- H-1B labor condition applications
- 3,142 published
- 5 pending
- $93,800 median, n=3,137
Its median H-1B wage is $93,800 across 3,137 LCAs, 29.7% lower than its median PERM wage of $133,432 across 145 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.
Of its 29 pending PERM cases, 1 (3.5%) sit outside DOL's normal queue: 1 under appeal. Where that sits among every employer.
Every case across these programs is in the search.
How these are counted
Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name, read under the 6 spellings DOL's files use for it; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.
Its newest wage requests and LCAs
Filed by Persistent Systems Inc., newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.
Wage requests
- P-100-26289-306920 IT Project Manager 2026-10-16 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26289-306898 IT Project Manager 2026-10-16 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26286-297816 Computer Programmer 2026-10-13 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26282-291897 Senior Architect 2026-10-09 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26279-284101 Solution Architect 2026-10-06 · IN PROCESS
H-1B LCAs
- I-200-26289-304680 Computer Programmer II 2026-10-16 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26288-301907 Computer Programmer II 2026-10-15 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26288-301900 Software Developer II 2026-10-15 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26286-296136 Computer Programmer II 2026-10-13 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26286-296119 Computer Programmer II 2026-10-13 · IN PROCESS
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
What its H-1B LCAs were for
From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 3,142 LCAs filed by Persistent Systems Inc., 3,003 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.
New hires and transfers
1,017 positions for new employment, 613 moving here from another employer.
- New employment 7a 1,017 · 34%
- Change of employer 7e 613 · 20%
- Continuing 7b 220 · 7%
- Change in previous employment 7c 238 · 8%
- Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
- Amended petition 7f 915 · 30%
Shares of the 3,003 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.
What each box on the form means
- New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
- Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
- Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
- Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
- Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
- Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.
Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.
Wage level it chose
- Level I 4 · 1%
- Level II 2,803 · 99%
- Level III 35 · 1%
- Level IV 2 · 1%
Shares of the 2,844 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 159 of 3,003 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.
What it declared on Section H
- H-1B-dependent
- Yes
- Found a willful violator
- No
As answered on its newest LCA, filed June 23, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 2,206 of 2,972 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 3,135. Both are the employer's own answers.
What the two answers mean
H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.
Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.
Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR
Visas these LCAs support: H-1B 3,135 · E-3 (Australia) 7. E-3 and H-1B1 use the same LCA as the H-1B.
Against other sponsors
Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.
How it compares with other sponsors
Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.
PERM approval rate
91.4% of 140 decided PERM cases
Higher than 6% of the 1,343 sponsors with 30 or more decided cases.
PERM filings in the last 12 months
31 filed in the last 12 months
Higher than 97% of the 13,965 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.
H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months
759 certified in the last 24 months
At the top of the 27,903 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.
Share of H-1B positions that were transfers
33% of 915 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 85% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.
Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV
3.3% of 780 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 13% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.
USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years
98.7% of 1,276 USCIS decisions
Higher than 51% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.
Also on its record
- Its newest LCA that answered declared it H-1B dependent (decided 2026-06-30).
Approval rate
91.4%ahead of 6%
Median days to decision
491 daysahead of 13%
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Against the sponsors ranked nearest
The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 116 and 190 filings.
- Their median wait
- 468 days
- This one
- 491 days
This one sits 23 days behind them.
Why no approval rate
A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.
Where this sits in the ranking
Ranked 260 of 70,985 by volume: 259 filed at least as many filings, and 70,725 filed no more.
- Just above
- AWAD Holdings, Inc. 146 filings
- Just below
- RASSY LOGISTICS, LLC 145 filings
Sponsors filing at the same rate
Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.
Sponsors hiring for the same work
The employers filing the most PERM cases for Computer Systems Analysts, the occupation this sponsor files for most.
- #9 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED 2,319 filings · none denied
- #51 LTIMindtree Limited 621 filings · none denied
- #19 Salesforce, Inc. 1,373 filings · 3 denied
- #1 Microsoft Corporation 6,875 filings · 45 denied
- #72 HCL America, Inc. 478 filings · 9 denied
- #21 Ernst & Young U.S. LLP 1,267 filings · 8 denied
What they file, and where
A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.
What the jobs are
SOC 15-1211.00 · 67 filings, 46% of everything they file · 91.0% approved
- Software Developers 15-1252.0021
- Project Management Specialists 13-1082.0019
- Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers 15-1253.008
- Computer Programmers 15-1251.005
- Network and Computer Systems Administrators 15-1244.005
How this is counted
These are the 6 occupations with the most filings, 125 of 145 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.
The industry they declared
Computer Systems Design Services
NAICS 541512 · 133 filings
- Computer Systems Design and Related Services 541517
- Custom Computer Programming Services 5415115
How this is counted
The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.
Where the jobs are
- California 139
How this is counted
The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. This state covers 139 of 145 filings.
Where the work is
- Santa Clara, CA 139
How this is counted
The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. This city covers 139 of 145 filings.
Who files for them
- Legal Solutions Group 58 filings · 77.4% approved
- CHUGH LLP 47 filings · 100.0% approved
- Jethmalani & Nallaseth PLLC 23 filings
- Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP 8 filings
- Kidambi & Associates, P.C. 6 filings
- Dua-Hobbs Associates 3 filings
How this is counted
The law firm named on the application. 145 of 145 filings, 100% of the total.
Newspapers it advertised in
- 102 cases
The Mercury News
- 26 cases
San Francisco Chronicle
How this is counted
The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.
Additional steps it used
- 128 cases
The employer's website
- 122 cases
Employee referral programs
- 102 cases
Local or ethnic newspapers
- 27 cases
Job search websites
- 6 cases
Radio or TV ads
How this is counted
The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.
How long before filing it began
- 0.0%
Under 30 days
- 0.0%
30 to 59 days
- 19%
60 to 89 days
- 32%
90 to 119 days
- 27%
120 to 149 days
- 22%
150 to 180 days
- 0.8%
Over 180 days
How this is counted
Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.
History
Year by year since 2010
465 PERM decisions from FY2010 to FY2026, busiest in FY2026 with 79.
- certified
- denied
- withdrawn
Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.
Every year as a table
| Fiscal year | Certified | Denied | Withdrawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2010 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2011 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2012 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2013 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2014 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2015 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2016 | 50 | 0 | 2 |
| FY2017 | 34 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2018 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2019 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2020 | 29 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2021 | 37 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2022 | 49 | 0 | 11 |
| FY2023 | 29 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2024 | 23 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2025 | 38 | 0 | 5 |
| FY2026 | 67 | 12 | 0 |
Decided in FY2016 to FY2023
The 25 most recent of 290. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.
| Case | Decided | Outcome | Job | Offered wage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-22201-91323 | 2023-09-05 | certified | IT LEAD, CA | $116,043 |
| A-22215-99154 | 2023-08-18 | certified | Client Partner, CA | $168,834 |
| A-22203-92907 | 2023-07-28 | certified | Solution Architect II, CA | $116,043 |
| A-22229-07043 | 2023-07-26 | certified | Solution Architect, CA | $116,043 |
| A-22208-95350 | 2023-07-06 | certified | Solution Architect II, CA | $116,043 |
| A-22234-09317 | 2023-07-05 | certified | Solution Architect II, CA | $168,834 |
| A-22230-07883 | 2023-07-03 | certified | Sales Engineer II, CA | $171,350 |
| A-22193-86635 | 2023-07-03 | certified | Engineering Lead, CA | $89,648 |
The other 17
| A-22144-59807 | 2023-07-03 | certified | Senior Architect, CA | $168,834 |
| A-22165-71413 | 2023-06-01 | certified | Engineering Lead, CA | $74,194 |
| A-22070-23340 | 2023-05-19 | certified | Sales Engineer, CA | $157,851 |
| A-22144-59749 | 2023-04-25 | certified | Architect, CA | $116,043 |
| A-22152-64666 | 2023-04-25 | certified | Solution Architect II, CA | $110,094 |
| A-22161-69548 | 2023-04-20 | certified | SOFTWARE ARCHITECT, CA | $116,043 |
| A-22083-29971 | 2023-04-18 | certified | CLIENT PARTNER, CA | $171,350 |
| A-22150-62946 | 2023-04-18 | certified | SOFTWARE ARCHITECT, CA | $125,000 |
| A-22154-66067 | 2023-03-31 | certified | Solution Architect, CA | $116,043 |
| A-22157-66846 | 2023-03-24 | certified | Solution Architect, CA | $116,043 |
| A-22167-73389 | 2023-03-23 | certified | Solution Architect, CA | $116,043 |
| A-22067-21035 | 2023-02-21 | certified | Engineering Lead, CA | $130,894 |
| A-22066-20399 | 2023-02-09 | certified | COMPUTER PROGRAMMER, CA | $93,850 |
| A-22062-18682 | 2023-01-25 | certified | Solution Architect, CA | $110,094 |
| A-22081-28761 | 2023-01-23 | certified | SENIOR ARCHITECT, CA | $157,851 |
| A-22070-23259 | 2023-01-09 | certified | Senior Computer Programmer Analyst, CA | $157,851 |
| A-22063-19065 | 2023-01-09 | certified | Senior Computer Programmer Analyst, CA | $157,851 |
Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023
From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.
Country of citizenship
- India 285
- Mexico 2
- Indonesia 1
- Nigeria 1
- Pakistan 1
Worker's education
- Bachelor's 206
- Master's 79
- Doctorate 2
- None 2
- Other 1
Visa held when filed
- H-1B 278
- L-1 3
- NOT IN USA 2
- TN 2
- F-1 1
- H-4 1
Schools
- UNIVERSITY OF PUNE 50
- JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 13
- RASHTRASANT TUKADOJI MAHARAJ NAGPUR UNIVERSITY 13
- VISVESWARAIAH TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, BELGAUM 8
- GOA UNIVERSITY 7
- NAGPUR UNIVERSITY 7
Fields of study
- COMPUTER ENGINEERING 27
- COMPUTER SCIENCE 26
- BACHELOR OF SCIENCE DEGREE IN COMPUTER ENGINEERING 20
- BACHELOR OF SCIENCE DEGREE IN ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 12
- COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING 12
- ENGINEERING 10
Notes on these numbers
What this rank counts, and what it doesn't
DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The entry below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #260 counts this page's cases only.
2 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.
What these numbers don't say
5 notes
- The wage is the job, not the payer
- Their filings are led by Computer Systems Analysts, 67 of 145. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
- Volume doesn’t change the wait
- DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 145 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
- The name is a legal entity
- DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 260. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
- A median over 140 decided cases
- The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
- Two sources, and they do not add up
- The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is CA. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built
Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load
Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 19, 2026 · daily
What each source includes
Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.
Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.
Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.