Updated
PERM sponsor, #158 of 70,985 by filings
ARUP Laboratories
ARUP Laboratories sponsors green cards: it filed 18 PERM cases in the last 12 months, the newest on September 2, 2026. ARUP Laboratories has 18 PERM cases waiting with DOL.
- Main job
- Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technologists · 60% of its filings
- Main worksite
- Salt Lake City, UT · 99% of its filings
- Industry
- Medical Laboratories · NAICS 621511
Waiting on a case with ARUP Laboratories?
- When it'll likely be decided
- An email when DOL moves it
Filings
236
#158 of 70,985
Certified
223
0 denied
Approval
100.0%
field 96.8%
Median wage
$69,472
offered, per year
Median days
424
42 faster than the field
Right now
DOL's live record of its cases, read every day, and what it has done to them as a group.
Waiting on a decision
18
of 205 tracked cases. The other 187 have been decided.
The oldest one still waiting was filed April 6, 2026, 6 months ago.
Where those 18 are standing
- ANALYST REVIEW
- 18100%
A Department of Labor analyst has the application. This is the main queue, and it is where most pending PERM cases sit.
None of this changes one case's wait: DOL works one national line. Where DOL is working now is the figure that does.
Follow ARUP Laboratories
An email when DOL moves its cases as a group: five or more on or off hold in a day, or a batch decided well above its usual pace.
What DOL has done to its cases as a group
Nothing employer-wide since this site's record began on August 27, 2026.
Its newest filings
Filed since DOL's last quarterly file, so the wage and law firm aren't published yet.
- G-100-26245-211384 Bioinformatics Engineer filed 2026-09-02 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26245-212430 Medical Laboratory Scientist III (NYQ) filed 2026-09-02 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26245-212488 Medical Laboratory Scientist III NYQ filed 2026-09-02 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26244-209333 Medical Laboratory Scientist III (NYQ) filed 2026-09-01 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26243-205376 Medical Laboratory Scientist III NYQ filed 2026-08-31 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26243-205493 Medical Laboratory Scientist III (NYQ) filed 2026-08-31 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26215-142463 Certified Technologist III NYQ filed 2026-08-03 · ANALYST REVIEW
- G-100-26204-119953 Medical Laboratory Scientist II NYQ filed 2026-07-23 · ANALYST REVIEW
The 8 newest. Every filing by this employer is in the case search, live and published together.
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
How long it takes
How long their cases are taking
- 302 days
Every employer
median of 28,615 decisions in the same 90 days
None of their cases were decided in the last 90 days, too few for a median of their own. Filing to decision, over decisions we watched DOL make; withdrawals left out.
Filed today: a new case joins the same line as anyone's, behind 80,983 cases, and would be decided around March 15, 2027 (between February 23, 2027 and April 24, 2027). Estimate another date
Every program
Across DOL's programs
The wage request, the PERM and the H-1B labor condition application, one line each.
- PERM (green card)
- 236 published
- 18 pending
- $69,472 median, n=236
- Prevailing wage requests
- 113 published
- 1 pending
- $36,546 median, n=101
- H-1B labor condition applications
- 659 published
- 4 pending
- $67,808 median, n=659
Its median H-1B wage is $67,808 across 659 LCAs, 2.4% lower than its median PERM wage of $69,472 across 236 cases. Different forms, different years and different jobs sit behind the two medians, so this is a gap in what was filed, not a finding.
Every case across these programs is in the search.
How these are counted
Medians are of the published rows with a usable wage, annualised from whatever unit the filing quoted, and withheld under 10 wages. DOL publishes no employer number, so filings are matched by the employer's legal name; another employer with the same legal name would be counted here too. The PERM is the green-card step; the wage request comes months before it, and the LCA is the separate form for an H-1B. DOL publishes each in its own file, and its live record shows what is still open.
Its newest wage requests and LCAs
Filed by ARUP Laboratories, newest first. Decided ones carry the wage from DOL's quarterly files.
Wage requests
- P-100-26274-274205 Medical Laboratory Scientist II 2026-10-01 · IN PROCESS
- P-100-26156-986553 Medical Laboratory Scientist III (NYQ) 2026-06-05 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
- P-100-26128-888426 Medical Laboratory Scientist III (NYQ) 2026-05-08 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
- P-100-26113-827920 Medical Laboratory Scientist II 2026-04-23 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
- P-100-26107-804360 Medical Laboratory Scientist III (NYQ) 2026-04-17 · DETERMINATION ISSUED
H-1B LCAs
- I-200-26288-303344 Medical Laboratory Scientist III (NYQ) 2026-10-15 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26288-303319 Medical Laboratory Scientist, Specialist I 2026-10-15 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26288-303228 Technologist II, Certified 2026-10-15 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26288-303110 Medical Laboratory Scientist II (NYQ) 2026-10-15 · IN PROCESS
- I-200-26254-229502 Medical Laboratory Scientist III (NYQ) 2026-09-11 · CERTIFIED
Source: DOL's own case-status service, flag.dol.gov, where any of these numbers can be looked up. A filing shows there soon after it's made, months before DOL's quarterly files.
What its H-1B LCAs were for
From DOL's quarterly LCA files: 659 LCAs filed by ARUP Laboratories, 634 of them certified with the worker breakdown on Form ETA-9035.
New hires and transfers
288 positions for new employment, 12 moving here from another employer.
- New employment 7a 288 · 45%
- Change of employer 7e 12 · 2%
- Continuing 7b 307 · 48%
- Change in previous employment 7c 0 · 0%
- Concurrent employment 7d 0 · 0%
- Amended petition 7f 28 · 4%
Shares of the 634 worker positions requested. These are positions on certified LCAs, not people hired: DOL certifies an LCA before any petition, and many are never used.
What each box on the form means
- New employment (7a). Starting with a new employer.
- Change of employer (7e). Moving here from another employer, keeping the visa classification already held.
- Continuing (7b). Staying with the same employer.
- Change in previous employment (7c). Same employer, no material change to the job duties.
- Concurrent employment (7d). Adding this employer while keeping another.
- Amended petition (7f). Same employer, with a material change to the job duties.
Form ETA-9035, Section B, Item 7, in DOL's words from its LCA record layout. One LCA can tick several boxes.
Wage level it chose
- Level I 2 · 1%
- Level II 242 · 38%
- Level III 390 · 62%
- Level IV 0 · 0%
Shares of the 634 certified LCAs that named an OES level. The form asks for the level only when the employer set the wage from the OES survey itself; 0 of 634 used another source, such as a DOL wage determination or another survey. Level I is entry, Level IV fully competent.
What it declared on Section H
- H-1B-dependent
- No
- Found a willful violator
- No
As answered on its newest LCA, filed April 23, 2026. Declared H-1B-dependent on 0 of 638 LCAs, and a willful violator on 0 of 659. Both are the employer's own answers.
What the two answers mean
H-1B-dependent (20 CFR 655.736(a)): 25 or fewer full-time-equivalent employees in the US and more than 7 H-1B workers; 26 to 50 and more than 12; or 51 or more, with H-1B workers equal to at least 15% of them.
Willful violator (655.736(f)): DOL or the Justice Department found a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact in the five years before the LCA was filed.
Either one adds two promises to the employer's LCAs: not to displace US workers, and to recruit US workers before hiring H-1B workers (655.738, 655.739). They don't apply to an LCA used only for exempt workers, paid at least $60,000 a year or holding a related master's degree (655.737). The rule on eCFR
Against other sponsors
Where it sits among 70,985 sponsors. The full ranking sorts every column.
How it compares with other sponsors
Each figure ranked only among sponsors with enough cases for it to mean something. No single score: they measure different things.
PERM approval rate
100.0% of 223 decided PERM cases
Higher than 67% of the 1,343 sponsors with 30 or more decided cases.
PERM filings in the last 12 months
18 filed in the last 12 months
Higher than 95% of the 13,942 sponsors that filed in the last 12 months.
H-1B LCAs certified in the last 24 months
194 certified in the last 24 months
Higher than 98% of the 27,916 sponsors with a certified LCA in the last 24 months.
Share of H-1B positions that were transfers
2.3% of 220 certified H-1B positions, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 10% of the 5,558 sponsors with 20 or more certified positions.
Share of H-1B LCAs at wage level III or IV
88% of 220 certified LCAs with a level, LCAs decided Jun 2024 to Jun 2026
Higher than 97% of the 5,177 sponsors with 20 or more leveled LCAs.
USCIS H-1B approval rate, last 3 fiscal years
96.8% of 221 USCIS decisions
Higher than 29% of the 5,810 sponsors with 20 or more USCIS decisions.
Approval rate
100.0%ahead of 34%, level with 891 more
Median days to decision
424 daysahead of 80%
Each bar counts sponsors at that value. More
Against the sponsors ranked nearest
The 120 sponsors ranked nearest filed between 181 and 373 filings.
- Their median wait
- 462 days
- This one
- 424 days
This one sits 38 days ahead of them.
Why no approval rate
A band is a slice of the volume ranking rather than a population picked for having enough decided cases, so a band rate would be solid at the top of the list and noise at the bottom, under one heading.
Where this sits in the ranking
Ranked 158 of 70,985 by volume: 157 filed at least as many filings, and 70,827 filed no more.
- Just above
- SWEET VIRGINIA CARE, LLC 237 filings
- Just below
- American Airlines, Inc. 234 filings
Sponsors filing at the same rate
Ranked either side of this one: they file about as many PERM cases.
- #157 SWEET VIRGINIA CARE, LLC 237 filings · 9 denied
- #159 American Airlines, Inc. 234 filings · none denied
- #156 Fiserv Solutions, LLC 240 filings · 1 denied
- #160 Mastech Digital Technologies, Inc. 234 filings · none denied
- #155 Harrison Poultry Inc 243 filings · none denied
- #161 Dallas Independent School District 234 filings · 32 denied
Sponsors hiring for the same work
The employers filing the most PERM cases for Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technologists, the occupation this sponsor files for most.
- #3 Management Health Systems, LLC 2,849 filings · none denied
- #27 Conexus MedStaff LLC 1,091 filings · 3 denied
- #60 Health Carousel, LLC 552 filings · none denied
- #228 Comtrix Solutions, Inc. 172 filings · none denied
- #291 Cosmic Healthcare, LLC 127 filings · none denied
- #33 Management Health Systems, LLC DBA MedPro 869 filings · none denied
What they file, and where
A rank says how much. It says nothing about what the work is, which is the part a job offer from this sponsor turns on.
What the jobs are
Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technologists
SOC 29-2011.00 · 141 filings, 60% of everything they file · 100.0% approved
- Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technologists 29-201166
- Cytogenetic Technologists 29-2011.018
- Bioinformatics Scientists 19-1029.011
- Cytotechnologists 29-2011.021
How this is counted
These are the 5 occupations with the most filings, 217 of 236 cases between them. The occupation on a PERM is the SOC code on the form, which is the job as DOL classifies it rather than the job title on the offer. DOL still accepts two SOC vintages, so one job can appear twice under two codes; the code is printed for exactly that reason.
The industry they declared
Medical Laboratories
NAICS 621511 · 236 filings
How this is counted
The NAICS code the employer entered on the form, with the Census Bureau's title for it. DOL publishes the code alone, and an employer can file under more than one.
Where the jobs are
- Utah 236
How this is counted
The worksite state on the application, which is where the job is and not where the company is headquartered. Volume by state across everyone is on the state map. This state covers 236 of 236 filings.
Where the work is
- Salt Lake City, UT 234
- South Jordan, UT 2
How this is counted
The worksite city on the application, which is where the job is. These 2 cities cover 236 of 236 filings.
Who files for them
- University of Utah Office of General Counsel 236 filings · 100.0% approved
How this is counted
The law firm named on the application. 236 of 236 filings, 100% of the total.
Newspapers it advertised in
- 169 cases
The Salt Lake Tribune
- 1 cases
The Salt Lake Tribue
How this is counted
The newspaper or professional journal named for each case's two print ads, one count per paper per case, however the filer spelled it.
Additional steps it used
- 169 cases
Campus placement offices
- 169 cases
Job search websites
- 169 cases
Local or ethnic newspapers
- 169 cases
Radio or TV ads
- 2 cases
On-campus recruiting
How this is counted
The steps a professional job needs beyond the job order and the ads, by the number of cases that name each.
How long before filing it began
- 0.0%
Under 30 days
- 0.0%
30 to 59 days
- 75%
60 to 89 days
- 19%
90 to 119 days
- 3.6%
120 to 149 days
- 3.0%
150 to 180 days
- 0.0%
Over 180 days
How this is counted
Days from the first recruitment step to the filing. 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(e) puts the job order and ads 30 to 180 days before filing.
History
Year by year since 2009
288 PERM decisions from FY2009 to FY2026, busiest in FY2025 with 91.
- certified
- denied
- withdrawn
Fiscal years, October to September. A year filed under another name is missing, not zero. FY2026 is partial: DOL's newest file runs through June 2026.
Every year as a table
| Fiscal year | Certified | Denied | Withdrawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2009 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2010 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2011 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2012 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2013 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2014 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
| FY2015 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2016 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| FY2017 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| FY2018 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2019 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2021 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2022 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2023 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| FY2024 | 79 | 0 | 7 |
| FY2025 | 86 | 0 | 5 |
| FY2026 | 58 | 0 | 1 |
Decided in FY2016 to FY2023
The 25 most recent of 32. Case numbers from these years start with A-; look one up for DOL's full record.
| Case | Decided | Outcome | Job | Offered wage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-22222-03570 | 2023-06-14 | certified | Medical Laboratory Scientist Lead, UT | $73,988 |
| A-22182-82543 | 2023-05-10 | certified | Medical Laboratory Scientist III (NYQ), UT | $64,896 |
| A-22182-82535 | 2023-05-10 | certified | Medical Laboratory Scientist III (NYQ), UT | $64,563 |
| A-22182-82551 | 2023-04-18 | certified | Medical Laboratory Scientist III (NYQ), UT | $64,605 |
| A-22124-50284 | 2023-02-21 | certified | Medical Laboratory Scientist III (NYQ), UT | $70,034 |
| A-23003-81450 | 2023-02-10 | withdrawn | Medical Laboratory Scientist Specialist I, UT | $70,970 |
| A-22335-65917 | 2023-02-07 | withdrawn | Medical Laboratory Scientist II, UT | $65,562 |
| A-22124-50245 | 2023-01-26 | certified | Medical Laboratory Scientist Lead, UT | $79,290 |
The other 17
| A-22124-50271 | 2023-01-24 | certified | Medical Laboratory Scientist III (NYQ), UT | $64,272 |
| A-21316-72344 | 2022-07-05 | certified | Medical Laboratory Scientist, Specialist I, UT | $66,810 |
| A-21197-18592 | 2022-04-04 | certified | Medical Laboratory Scientist III (NYQ), UT | $63,752 |
| A-21063-58396 | 2021-10-19 | certified | Medical Laboratory Scientist II, UT | $61,443 |
| A-21088-67590 | 2021-10-13 | certified | Medical Laboratory Scientist, Specialist I, UT | $64,438 |
| A-20246-95184 | 2021-04-26 | certified | Medical Laboratory Scientist II, UT | $58,136 |
| A-20246-95108 | 2021-04-26 | certified | Medical Laboratory Scientist III (NYQ), UT | $58,760 |
| A-20231-89509 | 2021-04-20 | certified | Medical Laboratory Scientist II, UT | $56,909 |
| A-20227-88639 | 2021-04-16 | certified | Cytogenetic Technologist Specialist I, Certified (NYQ), UT | $76,544 |
| A-20077-31561 | 2020-10-28 | certified | Medical Laboratory Scientist II, UT | $61,526 |
| A-19136-06424 | 2019-07-02 | certified | Medical Technologist Senior, UT | $57,866 |
| A-18257-18501 | 2018-11-14 | certified | Medical Technologist Specialist, UT | $57,637 |
| A-17283-96628 | 2018-07-18 | certified | Medical Technologist, UT | $51,958 |
| A-17223-74855 | 2018-05-16 | certified | Medical Technologist Specialist, UT | $57,886 |
| A-17109-26635 | 2018-01-03 | certified | Medical Technologist Specialist, UT | $61,630 |
| A-17157-47158 | 2017-10-25 | certified | R and D Scientist, UT | $79,100 |
| A-17109-26940 | 2017-09-19 | certified | R and D Scientist, UT | $72,100 |
Who they sponsored, FY2016 to FY2023
From DOL's old form; the form in use since mid-2023 doesn't carry them. Top six of each.
Country of citizenship
- Philippines 14
- Nepal 6
- Mexico 3
- India 2
- Malaysia 2
- Albania 1
Worker's education
- Bachelor's 29
- Doctorate 1
- Master's 1
- Other 1
Visa held when filed
- H-1B 31
- TPS 1
Schools
- BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 5
- IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY 3
- STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO 3
- FAR EASTERN UNIVERSITY DR. NICANOR REYES MEDICAL FOUNDATION 2
- LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY 2
- MANILA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY 2
Fields of study
- MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 16
- CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENCE 4
- MEDICAL LABORATORY SCIENCE 4
- MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY SCIENCE 2
- MICROBIOLOGY 2
- BIOCHEMISTRY AND CHEMISTRY 1
Notes on these numbers
What this rank counts, and what it doesn't
DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one sponsor can appear under several. The entry below start the same way and were not merged, because the difference between them is more than a mistyped letter. Some may be the same sponsor; some are a different one. Rank #158 counts this page's cases only.
27 filings sit on those pages rather than this one. The methodology has the rule that decides which spellings merge.
What these numbers don't say
5 notes
- The wage is the job, not the payer
- Their filings are led by Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technologists, 141 of 236. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles they file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
- Volume doesn’t change the wait
- DOL works a single national queue, oldest first, whoever filed the case, so these 236 filings bought no priority: a company with four thousand waits exactly as long as one with three.
- The name is a legal entity
- DOL prints whatever went on the form, and here that name ranks 158. A group that files through several subsidiaries appears as several rows, and one that files everything through a parent appears once, so a rank is a rank among printed names rather than among companies.
- A median over 223 decided cases
- The queue is national and first in, first out, so this figure follows when the cases were filed as much as it follows the sponsor.
- Two sources, and they do not add up
- The filing counts come from DOL's disclosure files, where every row already carries a decision date, so nothing pending is in them. The queue figures come from a live per-case tracker with its own coverage and its own as-of date. Subtracting one from the other gives a number that means nothing. The worksite on most of these is UT. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built
Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly
Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load
Per-case statuses: flag.dol.gov/recaptcha/caseStatus (DOL, direct) · data through Oct 18, 2026 · daily
What each source includes
Case data: Decided PERM cases only. A case still waiting isn't in here, so counts and durations describe finished cases.
Employers and firms: Employers, law firms and occupations ranked from decided cases only.
Per-case statuses: Every PERM case DOL indexes, pending included. No wage, law firm or worksite: DOL reveals those only when a case is published.