PERM Tracker
Live DOL data · Automatic deadlines
Skip to main content

Updated

PERM law firm, #2,294 of 5,571 by cases

CARLTON FIELDS, P.A.

Biggest client
Amadeus Concepts LLC · 25% of its cases
Main job
Computer and Information Systems Managers · 25% of its cases
Filed from
Florida · The address on its filings

Is CARLTON FIELDS, P.A. handling your case?

  • When it'll likely be decided
  • An email when DOL moves it

It's on your ETA-9089 receipt. It goes into the page's address, so you can bookmark the result.

Don't have the number? Find it among this firm's filings.

Too few cases for a rate

7 decided cases: too few for an approval rate.

Why

Across every PERM case DOL decided in this window, 3.20% were denied. At that rate a file this size comes back clean most of the time whatever the firm did, so a percentage would be a fact about how few cases there are. Telling a clean record apart from the field takes about 117 decided cases.

Cases

8

#2,294 of 5,571

Certified

6

1 denied

Approval

Not shown

withheld: 7 decided

Median wage

$102,357

offered, per year

Median days

493

middle of 7 decided

The practice

Who they file for, what the jobs are and where the work sits, from the employer, occupation and worksite on their own applications.

Who they file for

  1. Amadeus Concepts LLC 2 filings
  2. University of New Haven 2 filings
  3. Charles R. Weber Company Inc. 1 filings
  4. Friedland Capital LLC 1 filings
  5. Italian Culinary Adventures 1 filings
  6. Sacred Heart University 1 filings
How this is counted

What the jobs are

Computer and Information Systems Managers

SOC 11-3021.00 · 2 filings, 25% of everything they file

How this is counted

Where the jobs are

  • Connecticut 3
  • Florida 3
  • California 1
  • Texas 1
How this is counted

Newspapers it advertised in

  1. Miami Herald

    3 cases
  2. New Haven Register

    2 cases
  3. Houston Chronicle

    1 cases
  4. Los Angeles Times

    1 cases
How this is counted

Additional steps it used

  1. Job search websites

    5 cases
  2. Local or ethnic newspapers

    5 cases
  3. Radio or TV ads

    5 cases
How this is counted

How long before filing it began

  1. Under 30 days

    0.0%
  2. 30 to 59 days

    0.0%
  3. 60 to 89 days

    0.0%
  4. 90 to 119 days

    0.0%
  5. 120 to 149 days

    14%
  6. 150 to 180 days

    86%
  7. Over 180 days

    0.0%
How this is counted

Where every PERM employer recruits

Every program

Beyond PERM: its other work for clients

DOL names the law firm or agent on each H-1B labor condition application, prevailing wage request and H-2A, H-2B and CW-1 application it publishes. These are the ones that name CARLTON FIELDS, P.A., under 3 spellings of its name.

H-1B LCAs

80 LCAs filed for clients, 93% certified

Decided from December 2019 to June 2026.

The employers it filed the most for

  1. University of New Haven 31
  2. Sacred Heart University 15
  3. Sacred Heart Univeristy 5
  4. Carlton Fields, P.A. 5
  5. Suffield Academy 3
  6. Carlton Fields, LLP 3
  7. Wooster School Corporation 2
  8. Unified Tech USA, LLC 2

Prevailing wage requests

10 wage requests

Decided from February 2024 to May 2026.

The employers it filed the most for

  1. Vista Clinical Diagnostics, LLC 1
  2. Unified Tech Caribbean Export Services, LLC 1
  3. Steiner-Atlantic, LLC 1
  4. Sacred Heart University 1
  5. Idesignbuild Consultants Co. 1
  6. Friedland Capital LLC 1
  7. Charles R. Weber Company Inc. 1
  8. Caribconex LLC 1

Against other firms

Where it sits among 5,571 firms. The full ranking sorts every column.

Position in the field 1,124 firms with 30+ decided

Approval rate

not shownunder 30 decided

0% 100%

Median days to decision

493 daysmiddle of 7 decided, too few to rank

361d 1059d
Each bar counts firms at that value. More
Each bar counts firms at that value. Firms with fewer than 30 decided cases are left out of the population rather than plotted, because a rate over a handful of cases lands wherever the handful landed. This firm has 7 decided cases, so its median days is marked but left unranked, and no approval rate is drawn at all.
DOL PERM disclosure files

Against the firms ranked nearest

The 120 firms ranked nearest filed between 7 and 8 cases.

Their median wait
474 days
This one
493 days

This one sits 19 days behind them.

Why no approval rate

Where this sits in the ranking

Ranked 2,294 of 5,571 by volume: 2,293 filed at least as many cases, and 3,277 filed no more.

Other Florida firms at this volume

Practices filing from Florida at a similar rate, taken from the ranks nearest this one. More

Practices filing from Florida at a similar rate, taken from the ranks nearest this one. State is the address on the filing, so a national firm appears under whichever office signed the form.

For the firm

Work at CARLTON FIELDS, P.A.? Claim this page

Add the firm's website, a short description, languages, offices and what it handles. Once we've read it, it shows on this page apart from DOL's figures, marked as the firm's own words. A verified firm also gets a badge for its own site that links here.

What the firm handles

Free. An address at a domain DOL's own filings list for this firm is confirmed by the link alone; any other address is checked by a person first. What you send shows here as the firm's own words once we've read it, and we can take it down.

Already claimed it?

Running the practice?

The free tracker carries the deadlines on every case, from the wage request to the I-140.

Notes on these numbers

What this rank counts, and what it doesn't

DOL prints the name that went on the form, so one firm can appear under several. 1 other spelling of this name was folded into this page and its cases are counted here. Nothing else in the file starts the same way.

What these numbers don't say

5 notes
The wage is the job, not the payer
Their filings are led by Computer and Information Systems Managers, 2 of 8. The median offered wage moves almost entirely with what roles their clients file. A software developer and a poultry cutter are different numbers wherever they are filed, so this figure is not plotted against the field and no percentile is given for it: that comparison would rank occupation mix and call it pay. Wages by occupation are on the wages page.
Nothing here is waiting
All 8 of the cases on this page carry a decision date, because every row in DOL's disclosure files does, so a case still in the queue is in none of these counts. The live tracker that does see pending cases records the employer on each one and not the firm, so a firm's current queue cannot be broken out at all. Where the queue stands overall is on the processing times page.
The approval rate barely separates firms
Across every firm with enough decided cases to carry a rate the median is above 99%, and hundreds have no denials at all. Placing near the top of that axis mostly means being level with the rest of it.
None of this measures the advice
It measures filings that DOL approved or denied. Whether the case was worth filing, what it cost, and how the firm handled an audit aren’t in these files.
A median over 7 decided cases
That’s a middle of a handful, and it moves with which months those few cases were filed in rather than with the firm. Where the queue stands today is on the processing times page.

The window these figures cover: DOL's PERM disclosure files for fiscal years 2024 to 2026, through the third quarter of 2026, 373,939 decided cases. Nothing pending is counted here. How each figure is built

Filings newer than DOL's last published file can't be attributed to this firm until DOL publishes them. The live list on the case search page carries them by employer.

Case data: DOL quarterly disclosure files (flag.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

Employers and firms: Derived from DOL's disclosure files · data through Jun 30, 2026 · rebuilt with each quarterly load

LCA disclosures: DOL quarterly LCA disclosure files (www.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

Wage determinations: DOL quarterly PW disclosure files (www.dol.gov) · data through Jun 30, 2026 · quarterly

What each source includes
Cite this page